Hi Viatologists,

The Worldwide Transportation Library has updated its FAQ section:

http://wwtl.info/#faq.html

"(2.15) Some of your highway photographs are accompanied by a distance
chart.  Neat!  But why don't all highway photographs have one?

It's a work in progress!  We are currently updating several highway
photographs a week with distance charts.  When this project completes
in 2011, all highway photographs will be accompanied by a distance
chart prescribing distances between relative major cities and
junctions."

Cheers,

Carl Rogers
"Environment first, transportology second"
********
Worldwide Transportation Library (WWTL):
http://wwtl.info
http://m.wwtl.info [Mobile]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Complete coverage of international roads and railways.
Since 2000, we have offered several photographs, videos and
Virtual 360 captures -- to each viatologist & transportologist.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
********

Carl Rogers  wrote:

> "(2.15) Some of your highway photographs are accompanied by a distance
> chart.  Neat!  But why don't all highway photographs have one?

Because the site has been created by a fuckwit!

On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:24:20 -0800, Carl Rogers hollered:

> Hi Viatologists,
> 
> The Worldwide Transportation Library has updated its FAQ section:
> 
> http://wwtl.info/#faq.html
> 
> "(2.15) Some of your highway photographs are accompanied by a distance
> chart.  Neat!  But why don't all highway photographs have one?

I find it hard to believe that enough people ask questions of the site 
for it to need an FAQ..

Mike P

"Carl Rogers"  wrote in message 
news:57eb98d3-da5a-43c9-8f01-c734e922fdd6@z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
| Hi Viat <bitch slap>

Here's a FAQ for you:

Why do you keep spamming your stupid bullshit into newsgroups where 
you are most definitely unwelcome if not outright hated, you goddamn 
looser?

RC

"Reality Check"  wrote in message 
news:CslHm.117576$Jp1.89257@en-nntp-02.dc1.easynews.com...
>
> "Carl Rogers"  wrote in message
> news:57eb98d3-da5a-43c9-8f01-c734e922fdd6@z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> | Hi Viat <bitch slap>
>
> Here's a FAQ for you:
>
> Why do you keep spamming your stupid bullshit into newsgroups where
> you are most definitely unwelcome if not outright hated, you goddamn
> looser?
>

Let me try to help out here.

I'll post this again (since I posted it to only rec.autos.driving the first 
time) as helpful for Outlook Express/Windows Mail users. Replying to that 
spammer just results in more incremetal status reports of that site/spamming 
this newsgroup, and the spammer is now using two different e-mail 
identities.

1. From the Tools menu, select Message Rules, then select News...
2. Click New...
3. Section 1--Mark the checkboxes for Where the message is on specified
newsgroup and Where the From line contains people
4. Click the hyperlinked (underlined) word: specified
5. Select rec.autos.driving from the list of subscribed newsgroups, then
click OK. (Repeat steps 4 and 5 but select another subscribed group, to add
additional groups being spammed to the list.)
6. Click the hyperlinked word phrase: contains people
7a. In the text field, enter: postmaster@wwtl.info, click Add, then click 
OK.
7b. In the text field, enter: calrog@gmail.com, click Add, then click OK.
8. Section 2--Mark the checkbox for Delete It.
9. Section 3--The Rule Description area should now read as follows:

Apply this rule after the message arrives
Where the message is on rec.autos.driving newsgroup
    and Where the From line contains 'postmaster@wwtl.info' or 
'calrog@gmail.com'
Delete it

10. Give the rule a descriptive name--I used "Delete: WWTL spam posts on
rec.autos.driving" (without quotes).
11. Click OK to save the rule--all future WWTL related spam posts should no
longer be downloaded by the newsreader client.

Note: this is only effective if no one also replies to any of the spam
posts, otherwise, the spam post replies are still present as replies to the
non-existent deleted posts. The spammer's posts definitely won't be seen for
any Windows Mail/Outlook Express user that uses this or a similar rule,
that's for sure.

(I will also confirm that the only messages I am seeing are the replies to 
that spammer. None of the headers or message bodies from the original post 
by the spammer are being seen. If everyone blocks the posts, instead of 
replying to them, eventually the spammer will just have single posts with no 
replies at all, while the rest of the more meaningful posts get actual 
discussion, and they'll likely just give up spamming when no one also visits 
their site.)

Ultimately, it's up to the individual reader whether they ignore or reply to 
that spammer.

To check a real website why not try www.malloc.co.uk

Filth cannot stop his "I'm considerably richer than you" pitch - he has 
photoshopped a can of custard to a picture of an "upmarket" car and to "his" 
yacht to prooove(sic) they're his

why not just ignore crap about viatology or whatever eh filth?
You're getting more like brian w - i.e only ever post personal insults and 
venom
bet mick p(?) AKA mini-me will do his usual attack dog bollox :)
"Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:1j8ihi7.46dati19s8a12N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
> Carl Rogers  wrote:
>
>> "(2.15) Some of your highway photographs are accompanied by a distance
>> chart.  Neat!  But why don't all highway photographs have one?
>
> Because the site has been created by a fuckwit!

thomas  wrote:

> To check a real website why not try www.malloc.co.uk

K3wL, a site that I don't spam to hundreds of groups and that is, as it
says, simply a playpen for mucking about on.

What was your point, other than a bizarre attempt to increase the numbe
rof hits on a site that even I only look at once in a blue moon?
 
> Filth cannot stop his "I'm considerably richer than you" pitch - he has
> photoshopped a can of custard to a picture of an "upmarket" car and to "his"
> yacht to prooove(sic) they're his

Context, Toomy, context. Something that flies right over your pointy
little head. You don't even seem to have read the text on that web site.
Maybe you need to get your carer to explain it to you. You probably also
need someone to adjust your headstick so that you can type properly.

You also possibly need someone to explain what "sic" means.

> why not just ignore crap about viatology or whatever eh filth?

Why don't you lose your obsession with me, eh Toomy you deranged
stalker?

> You're getting more like brian w - i.e only ever post personal insults and
> venom

You're getting more like a frothing mad basket case each day that
passes. Have you got to the stage of drinking your own urine yet, or are
you still collecting it in milk bottles that you store in the kitchen?

On 2 Nov, 07:19, "thomas"  wrote:
> To check a real website why not trywww.malloc.co.uk
>
> Filth cannot stop his "I'm considerably richer than you" pitch - he has
> photoshopped a can of custard to a picture of an "upmarket" car and to "his"
> yacht to prooove(sic) they're his
>
> why not just ignore crap about viatology or whatever eh filth?
> You're getting more like brian w - i.e only ever post personal insults and
> venom
> bet mick p(?) AKA mini-me will do his usual attack dog bollox

That'd be "attack dog bollox" rather than "weird pisshead internet
drooling retard stalker who can't get a single fact right bollox" I
suppose, or is that some poor attempt at irony on your part then.

How's this for an idea.? Stop posting drivel, I'll stop commenting on
it...

Mike P

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:07:15 +0000, Steve Firth wrote:

> You're getting more like a frothing mad basket case each day that
> passes. Have you got to the stage of drinking your own urine yet, or are
> you still collecting it in milk bottles that you store in the kitchen?

What a charming thing to read before breakfast. Thanks For The Mental 
Scar.



-- 
'Smoking is Healthier than Fascism'

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:19:25 +0000, thomas wrote:

> Filth cannot stop his "I'm considerably richer than you" pitch - he has
> photoshopped a can of custard to a picture of an "upmarket" car and to
> "his" yacht to prooove(sic) they're his

Look, pal, this is a Carl Rogers abuse thread, not a Steve Firth abuse 
thread, so take yr psychosis elsewhere, thank you.



-- 
'Smoking is Healthier than Fascism'

Otto Yamamoto  wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:19:25 +0000, thomas wrote:
> 
> > Filth cannot stop his "I'm considerably richer than you" pitch - he has
> > photoshopped a can of custard to a picture of an "upmarket" car and to
> > "his" yacht to prooove(sic) they're his
> 
> Look, pal, this is a Carl Rogers abuse thread, not a Steve Firth abuse
> thread, so take yr psychosis elsewhere, thank you.

One of the many funny things about Toomy - a man so stupid that he can't
even spell his own name correctly twice in a row - is his cluelessness.
The pictures he refers to were Photoshopped as part of a joke. Someone
in a driving group suggested that we should each provide photos of our
cars via a website. Someone else said that people would just post
fantasy car images and then suggested to ensure that the game was fair
that each picture should include a shot of a tin of custard powder to
"prove" the shot was genuine. I pointed out that this was silly since
Photoshop would allow anyone to provide an image with the custard powder
in view and then provided a couple of images to show that it was
possible. My website even indicates that this was the case.

Toomy can't seem to grasp this concept of "a joke" and the poor little
dead takes it all terribly seriously.


He's also known for the ludicrous tall tales he tells. He has claimed
that his work has been performed on BBC Radio 7 and that he receives a
huge income from that work. He claims to have been educated at the best
public (that private to you Americans) school in Wales (i.e. he's
claiming to be a well-heeled alumnus of an Ivy-covered school) yet,
despite this fortunate start in life, he can barely scrawl his own name.

Recently he claimed to own a V8 Diesel Engined Range Rover. Sadly for
Toomy he claimed to have bought it a year before it was offered for sale
to the public. He is a certified net-kook and if such a thing had
meaning today I'd submit him for kook of the month club.

Toomy and CalRog would get along fine - two underachieving fantasy
monkeys.

On 2 Nov, 12:49, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
 today I'd submit him for kook of the month club.
>
> Toomy and CalRog would get along fine - two underachieving fantasy
> monkeys.

Well as they say , it takes one to recoginse one.

I don't see the following questions on your FAQ:

Q: Why is the Javascript on your website so lame?  Is there a contest
for the lamest use of Javascript?

Q: Why do you wish to drive traffic away from your website by spamming the
fact that you have watermarked 3 photographs on it, every time you 
watermark 3 photos?  Is there also a contest for the website with the
fewest hits?

Q: Why don't you use a script using gimp or something to watermark all
photos in one shot, and just be done with it?

Q: Why do you wish to force a fucktardedly stupid word like "v**t*l*g*" on
us, rather than the commonly used "road fan", "Roads Scholar" or "roadgeek"?
Why do you pretend that "v**t*l*g*" is some sort of science?

Q: Why won't you answer any of these questions?

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:30:38 +0000, Michael Moroney said:

> I don't see the following questions on your FAQ:
> 
> Q: Why is the Javascript on your website so lame? 

Because Carl is a retard

> Q: Why do you wish to drive traffic away from your website by spamming
> the fact that you have watermarked 3 photographs on it, every time you
> watermark 3 photos?

Because Carl is a retard

> Q: Why don't you use a script using gimp or something to watermark all
> photos in one shot, and just be done with it?

Because Carl is a retard
> 
> Q: Why do you wish to force a fucktardedly stupid word like "v**t*l*g*"
> on us, rather than the commonly used "road fan", "Roads Scholar" or
> "roadgeek"? Why do you pretend that "v**t*l*g*" is some sort of science?

Because Carl is a retard
 
> Q: Why won't you answer any of these questions?


At the risk of repeating myself.. because Carl .. you get the idea.


--
Mr. Nasty

If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:19:25 +0000, thomas said:

>
> Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1j8ihi7.46dati19s8a12N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
>> Carl Rogers  wrote:
>>
>>> "(2.15) Some of your highway photographs are accompanied by a distance
>>> chart.  Neat!  But why don't all highway photographs have one?
>>
>> Because the site has been created by a fuckwit!

 To check a real website why not try www.malloc.co.uk
> 
> Filth cannot stop his "I'm considerably richer than you" pitch - he has
> photoshopped a can of custard to a picture of an "upmarket" car and to
> "his" yacht to prooove(sic) they're his
> 
> why not just ignore crap about viatology or whatever eh filth? You're
> getting more like brian w - i.e only ever post personal insults and
> venom
> bet mick p(?) AKA mini-me will do his usual attack dog bollox :) "Steve

Who are you Thomas? Are you trying to make us think you are clever? It's 
really not working you know!!

--
Mr. Nasty

If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:30:38 +0000, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Q: Why won't you answer any of these questions?

Oh, but he has. You forget his bold declaration that he will do what he 
wants when he wants. He didn't get to be the engine driver on this train, 
so he's going to shit in all the cars so as to ruin everyone else's ride.



-- 
'Smoking is Healthier than Fascism'

"Michael Moroney"  wrote in message 
news:hcnmie$lmg$1@pcls4.std.com...
|I don't see the following questions on your FAQ:

(with all due deference to Mr. Nasty)

| Q: Why is the Javascript on your website so lame?  Is there a 
contest
| for the lamest use of Javascript?

Part 1: Because Carl is an asshole.
Part 2: Carl is the world champion of that contest and has to defend 
his crown.

| Q: Why do you wish to drive traffic away from your website by 
spamming the
| fact that you have watermarked 3 photographs on it, every time you
| watermark 3 photos?  Is there also a contest for the website with 
the
| fewest hits?

Part 1: Because Carl is an asshole.
Part 2: Probablly is and Carl is gunning to become the universal 
champion of that contest.

| Q: Why don't you use a script using gimp or something to watermark 
all
| photos in one shot, and just be done with it?

Because Carl is an asshole and it would cut away from his time getting 
lame-ass PRWeb releases made.

| Q: Why do you wish to force a fucktardedly stupid word like 
"v**t*l*g*" on
| us, rather than the commonly used "road fan", "Roads Scholar" or 
"roadgeek"?
| Why do you pretend that "v**t*l*g*" is some sort of science?

Both parts: Because Carl is an asshole.

| Q: Why won't you answer any of these questions?

Because Carl is an asshole.

RC

Last time on rec.autos.driving, Otto Yamamoto 
said:

>On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:30:38 +0000, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>> Q: Why won't you answer any of these questions?
>
>Oh, but he has. You forget his bold declaration that he will do what he 
>wants when he wants. He didn't get to be the engine driver on this train, 
>so he's going to shit in all the cars so as to ruin everyone else's ride.

Now that right there is a first-class transportology analogy, Comrade
Yamamoto!

On Nov 2, 10:06 pm, Scott in SoCal  wrote:
> Last time on rec.autos.driving, Otto Yamamoto 
> said:
>
> >On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:30:38 퍍, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >> Q: Why won't you answer any of these questions?
>
> >Oh, but he has. You forget his bold declaration that he will do what he
> >wants when he wants. He didn't get to be the engine driver on this train> >so he's going to shit in all the cars so as to ruin everyone else's ride> Now that right there is a first-class transportology analogy, Comrade
> Yamamoto!

I have to give the Comrade props for this one.

On Nov 2, 4:30 pm, Otto Yamamoto  wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:30:38 퍍, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Q: Why won't you answer any of these questions?
>
> Oh, but he has. You forget his bold declaration that he will do what he
> wants when he wants. He didn't get to be the engine driver on this train,
> so he's going to shit in all the cars so as to ruin everyone else's ride.
>
> --
> 'Smoking is Healthier than Fascism'

Ha, I actually like this analogy a lot.

On 2 Nov, 10:07, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> thomas  wrote:
> > To check a real website why not trywww.malloc.co.uk
>
> K3wL, a site that I don't spam to hundreds of groups and that is, as it
> says, simply a playpen for mucking about on.
>
> What was your point, other than a bizarre attempt to increase the numbe
> rof hits on a site that even I only look at once in a blue moon?
>
> > Filth cannot stop his "I'm considerably richer than you" pitch - he has
> > photoshopped a can of custard to a picture of an "upmarket" car and to "his"
> > yacht to prooove(sic) they're his
>
> Context, Toomy, context. Something that flies right over your pointy
> little head. You don't even seem to have read the text on that web site.
> Maybe you need to get your carer to explain it to you. You probably also
> need someone to adjust your headstick so that you can type properly.
>
> You also possibly need someone to explain what "sic" means.
>
> > why not just ignore crap about viatology or whatever eh filth?
>
> Why don't you lose your obsession with me, eh Toomy you deranged
> stalker?
>
> > You're getting more like brian w - i.e only ever post personal insults and
> > venom
>
> You're getting more like a frothing mad basket case each day that
> passes. Have you got to the stage of drinking your own urine yet, or are
> you still collecting it in milk bottles that you store in the kitchen?

Is anyone else reminded of Father Jack off TV's "Father Ted" when
Tammy starts his demented, alcohol-induced ranting?  I can just
picture him sat there, dribbling, shouting for more "Drink".  Only in
Timmy's case, rather than "Feck arse girls", it would be "Feck boys'
arses".

BrianW  wrote:

> Is anyone else reminded of Father Jack off TV's "Father Ted" when
> Tammy starts his demented, alcohol-induced ranting?

Oh yes.

> I can just picture him sat there, dribbling, shouting for more "Drink".
> Only in Timmy's case, rather than "Feck arse girls", it would be "Feck
> boys' arses".

<grin>

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:07:53 -0800 (PST), BrianW
 wrote:

>Is anyone else reminded of Father Jack off TV's 

We don't even get "Jack off TV for beginners" here let alone Further.

Which package is it included with ?   ;-)

>"Father Ted" when
>Tammy starts his demented, alcohol-induced ranting?  I can just
>picture him sat there, dribbling, shouting for more "Drink".  Only in
>Timmy's case, rather than "Feck arse girls", it would be "Feck boys'
>arses".

Derek