Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:43:11 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.transport        back       
Re: Who is liable for the damage?   
NM  writes:

> functions, you are so convinced you are right.QUESTION MARK, HERE BUT
> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
> one useful hand at the moment.

So sorry to hear about your friction burns
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:39:11 +0000   author:   unknown

Re: Who is liable for the damage?   
On 30 Oct, 10:12, Al C-F
 wrote:
> D.M. Procida wrote:
> > Al C-F  wrote:
>
> >>>>> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
> >>>>> one useful hand at the moment.
> >>>> That was the cyclist's fault.
> >>> No it was my fault.
> >> Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
> >> in control.
>
> >> The Germans have a word for it.
>
> > That's rather unpleasant.
>
> > It's one thing to be irritated by someone on Usenet, but it's something
> > else to be pleased that they've been injured.
>
> NM's prang makes an interesting development on the argument
> though, doesn't it? And so timely.

There you go again, assuming seems to be part of the mindset of this
cycling group. Where did I say I was involved in any type of RTA.
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:43:11 -0700 (PDT)   author:   NM

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us