Re: Who is liable for the damage?
NM writes:
> functions, you are so convinced you are right.QUESTION MARK, HERE BUT
> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
> one useful hand at the moment.
So sorry to hear about your friction burns
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:39:11 +0000
author: unknown
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
On 30 Oct, 10:12, Al C-F
wrote:
> D.M. Procida wrote:
> > Al C-F wrote:
>
> >>>>> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
> >>>>> one useful hand at the moment.
> >>>> That was the cyclist's fault.
> >>> No it was my fault.
> >> Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
> >> in control.
>
> >> The Germans have a word for it.
>
> > That's rather unpleasant.
>
> > It's one thing to be irritated by someone on Usenet, but it's something
> > else to be pleased that they've been injured.
>
> NM's prang makes an interesting development on the argument
> though, doesn't it? And so timely.
There you go again, assuming seems to be part of the mindset of this
cycling group. Where did I say I was involved in any type of RTA.
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
author: NM
|