Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:41:15 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.transport        back       
Re: Who is liable for the damage?   
On 29 Oct, 10:11, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> Al C-F  wrote:
> > Steve Firth wrote:
> > > mileburner  wrote:
>
> > >> Or have the goalposts now moved?
>
> > > No, he's still claiming that half a dozen mutually incompatible
> > > statements are "true". So his goalposts are in exactly the same place.
> > > One on the moon the other in the land of fairies.
>
> > Having been roundly humiliated, he is now claiming to have
> > been trolling all along.
>
> Oh yes, I saw that. As we keep telling Toomy, the art of trolling is to
> make someone else look stupid.
>
> > Daft bugger.
>
> He is that, I particularly liked the claim that the driver turned into
> the path of the cyclist leaving only a narrow gap that a cycle could fit
> through (I assume that was the meaning of "there was still sufficient
> room for the cyclist to pass along the main road in front of her") and
> later claims that the car was waiting perfectly positioned on the
> correct side of the white line.
>
> Then to follow it up with an "I was only trolling" excuse, priceless.
> Even Toomy would struggle to be that clueless.

I told you what happened as it was told to me, subsequent
investigations as respones to questions led minor details to be
altered on seeking clarification. However the whole thing blew up out
of all proportion due to the rabid anti car stance of certain posters,
at this point I started treating it as a game, so tough shit, you have
all been trolled well and truly and you brought on yourselves, hope it
was enjoyable.
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT)   author:   NM

Re: Who is liable for the damage?   
On 30 Oct, 09:40, Keitht <KeithT> wrote:
> NM wrote:
> > On 30 Oct, 02:01, Derek Geldard  wrote:
> >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:53:11 -0700 (PDT), NM 
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> On 29 Oct, 23:01, Al C-F
> >>>  wrote:
> >>>> NM wrote:
> >>>>> On 29 Oct, 18:03, Happi Monday  wrote:
> >>>>>> NM wrote:
> >>>>>>> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
> >>>>>>> one useful hand at the moment.
> >>>>>> That was the cyclist's fault.
> >>>>> No it was my fault.
> >>>> Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
> >>>> in control.
> >>> I was.
> >>>> The Germans have a word for it.
> >>> What word would that be
> >> "Es"
>
> >> Derek
>
> > I thought it was German not Spanish.
>
> " . . . makes a man want to speak Spanish
> Como se llama (si), bonita (si), mi casa (si, Shakira Shakira), su casa
> Shakira, Shakira"
>
> --
> Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle

claro que si, hombre, no passa nada.
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:41:15 -0700 (PDT)   author:   NM

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us