|
|
|
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:59:15 +0000,
group: uk.transport
back
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
mileburner wrote:
> Or have the goalposts now moved?
No, he's still claiming that half a dozen mutually incompatible
statements are "true". So his goalposts are in exactly the same place.
One on the moon the other in the land of fairies.
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:59:15 +0000
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
Steve Firth wrote:
> mileburner wrote:
>
>> Or have the goalposts now moved?
>
> No, he's still claiming that half a dozen mutually incompatible
> statements are "true". So his goalposts are in exactly the same place.
> One on the moon the other in the land of fairies.
Having been roundly humiliated, he is now claiming to have
been trolling all along.
Daft bugger.
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:43:01 +0000
author: Al C-F
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
Al C-F wrote:
> Steve Firth wrote:
> > mileburner wrote:
> >
> >> Or have the goalposts now moved?
> >
> > No, he's still claiming that half a dozen mutually incompatible
> > statements are "true". So his goalposts are in exactly the same place.
> > One on the moon the other in the land of fairies.
>
> Having been roundly humiliated, he is now claiming to have
> been trolling all along.
Oh yes, I saw that. As we keep telling Toomy, the art of trolling is to
make someone else look stupid.
> Daft bugger.
He is that, I particularly liked the claim that the driver turned into
the path of the cyclist leaving only a narrow gap that a cycle could fit
through (I assume that was the meaning of "there was still sufficient
room for the cyclist to pass along the main road in front of her") and
later claims that the car was waiting perfectly positioned on the
correct side of the white line.
Then to follow it up with an "I was only trolling" excuse, priceless.
Even Toomy would struggle to be that clueless.
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:11:11 +0000
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
NM wrote:
> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
> one useful hand at the moment.
That was the cyclist's fault.
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:03:43 +0000
author: Happi Monday
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
NM wrote:
> QUESTION MARK, HERE BUT CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that
> leaves me with only one useful hand at the moment.
Well that's your sex life ruined as well.
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:08:42 +0000
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
NM wrote:
> Thanks, but you are wrong yet again I was knocked off my motorcycle
> early this morning and am suffering a dislocated elbow, now re-set and
> in a cast, still bloody painful, I have spent most of the day in
> hospital, the morphine hasn't worn off yet hence the one fingered
> attack on the keyboard. (Cue knowfuckalls to make silly comments).
I'm very sorry to hear about your accident, which sounds extremely
painful. I'm glad it wasn't more serious.
I am very surprised though to hear that you are a motorcyclist. All the
motorcyclists I meet on the roads seem to share a sense of solidarity
with pedal cyclists, whereas you seem very unsympathetic and hostile to
them.
Daniele
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:18:44 +0000
author: (D.M. Procida)
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
NM wrote:
> On 29 Oct, 18:03, Happi Monday wrote:
>> NM wrote:
>>> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
>>> one useful hand at the moment.
>> That was the cyclist's fault.
>
> No it was my fault.
Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
in control.
The Germans have a word for it.
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:01:58 +0000
author: Al C-F
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
Al C-F wrote:
> >>> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
> >>> one useful hand at the moment.
> >> That was the cyclist's fault.
> >
> > No it was my fault.
> Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
> in control.
>
> The Germans have a word for it.
That's rather unpleasant.
It's one thing to be irritated by someone on Usenet, but it's something
else to be pleased that they've been injured.
Daniele
date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:47:56 +0000
author: (D.M. Procida)
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:53:11 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:
>On 29 Oct, 23:01, Al C-F
> wrote:
>> NM wrote:
>> > On 29 Oct, 18:03, Happi Monday wrote:
>> >> NM wrote:
>> >>> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
>> >>> one useful hand at the moment.
>> >> That was the cyclist's fault.
>>
>> > No it was my fault.
>>
>> Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
>> in control.
>
>I was.
>
>>
>> The Germans have a word for it.
>
>What word would that be
>
"Es"
Derek
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:01:45 +0000
author: Derek Geldard
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
NM wrote:
> On 30 Oct, 02:01, Derek Geldard wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:53:11 -0700 (PDT), NM
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 29 Oct, 23:01, Al C-F
>>> wrote:
>>>> NM wrote:
>>>>> On 29 Oct, 18:03, Happi Monday wrote:
>>>>>> NM wrote:
>>>>>>> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
>>>>>>> one useful hand at the moment.
>>>>>> That was the cyclist's fault.
>>>>> No it was my fault.
>>>> Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
>>>> in control.
>>> I was.
>>>> The Germans have a word for it.
>>> What word would that be
>> "Es"
>>
>> Derek
>
> I thought it was German not Spanish.
" . . . makes a man want to speak Spanish
Como se llama (si), bonita (si), mi casa (si, Shakira Shakira), su casa
Shakira, Shakira"
--
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:40:57 +0000
author: Keitht KeithT
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
D.M. Procida wrote:
> Al C-F wrote:
>
>>>>> CAN'T TYPE IT due to an accident this morning that leaves me with only
>>>>> one useful hand at the moment.
>>>> That was the cyclist's fault.
>>> No it was my fault.
>> Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
>> in control.
>>
>> The Germans have a word for it.
>
> That's rather unpleasant.
>
> It's one thing to be irritated by someone on Usenet, but it's something
> else to be pleased that they've been injured.
>
NM's prang makes an interesting development on the argument
though, doesn't it? And so timely.
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:12:00 +0000
author: Al C-F
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
NM wrote:
> > The Germans have a word for it.
>
> What word would that be
Betäubungsmittelverschreibungsverordnung
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:25:11 +0000
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: Who is liable for the damage?
Al C-F wrote:
> >> Pity you weren't riding in a manner that allowed you to stay
> >> in control.
> >>
> >> The Germans have a word for it.
> >
> > That's rather unpleasant.
> >
> > It's one thing to be irritated by someone on Usenet, but it's something
> > else to be pleased that they've been injured.
>
> NM's prang makes an interesting development on the argument
> though, doesn't it? And so timely.
If someone else's getting hurt in an accident is what floats your boat
or simply appears to you as a lucky opportunity to make an ironic point
at their expense, I think you're probably going to find yourself in a
minority, hopefully of one.
Daniele
date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:16:08 +0000
author: (D.M. Procida)
|
|
|