The Money Means Nothing says the Profit Al Gore

Says the Gorical Al Gore who is set to become the first AGW billionaire

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6496196/Al-Gore-profiting-from-climate-change-agenda.html

How that man wants to save the planet and UKMO think he's a hero.


Oh how easily the sheep are led.

date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:21:37 -0000 author: Lawrence Jenkins

Re: The Money Means Nothing says the Profit Al Gore

On Nov 3, 11:21 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins"  wrote:
> Says the Gorical Al Gore who is set to become the first AGW billionaire
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6496196/Al...
>
> How that man wants to save the planet and UKMO think he's a hero.
>
> Oh how easily the sheep are led.

I see your source is the Telegraph, that well known paragon of
balanced, unbiased views ;-)

Nick

date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:57:16 -0800 (PST) author: Nick

Re: The Money Means Nothing says the Profit Al Gore

"Nick"  wrote in message 
news:ff4c49fd-d404-4cd6-971a-69b1b8e1e807@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 3, 11:21 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins"  wrote:
> Says the Gorical Al Gore who is set to become the first AGW billionaire
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6496196/Al...
>
> How that man wants to save the planet and UKMO think he's a hero.
>
> Oh how easily the sheep are led.

I see your source is the Telegraph, that well known paragon of
balanced, unbiased views ;-)

Nick

Well Nick is it true or not, or are you acceptable of millionaire as opposed 
to billionaire. Seems to me either way Al has made himself a fortune whislt 
saving the planet. The oil companies make a fortune which they tend to 
inevst the bulk off in supplying us with heat. light and internet

date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:32:12 -0000 author: Lawrence Jenkins

Re: The Money Means Nothing says the Profit Al Gore

On 4 Nov, 01:32, "Lawrence Jenkins"  wrote:
> "Nick"  wrote in message
>
> news:ff4c49fd-d404-4cd6-971a-69b1b8e1e807@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 3, 11:21 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins"  wrote:
>
> > Says the Gorical Al Gore who is set to become the first AGW billionaire
>
> >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6496196/Al...
>
> > How that man wants to save the planet and UKMO think he's a hero.
>
> > Oh how easily the sheep are led.
>
> I see your source is the Telegraph, that well known paragon of
> balanced, unbiased views ;-)
>
> Nick
>
> Well Nick is it true or not, or are you acceptable of millionaire as opposed
> to billionaire. Seems to me either way Al has made himself a fortune whislt
> saving the planet. The oil companies make a fortune which they tend to
> inevst the bulk off in supplying us with heat. light and internet

The source is of no import, the Gore man is a proven charlatan.  And
the Telegraph probably has more balanced views, than say, the
Guardian, which adopts a strangulation policy on commentators who
don't subscribe to the AGW religion.

CK

date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:33:58 -0800 (PST) author: Natsman

Re: The Money Means Nothing says the Profit Al Gore

On Nov 4, 7:33 am, Natsman  wrote:
> On 4 Nov, 01:32, "Lawrence Jenkins"  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Nick"  wrote in message
>
> >news:ff4c49fd-d404-4cd6-971a-69b1b8e1e807@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com..> > On Nov 3, 11:21 pm, "Lawrence Jenkins"  wrote:
>
> > > Says the Gorical Al Gore who is set to become the first AGW billionaire
>
> > >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6496196/Al.> > > How that man wants to save the planet and UKMO think he's a hero.
>
> > > Oh how easily the sheep are led.
>
> > I see your source is the Telegraph, that well known paragon of
> > balanced, unbiased views ;-)
>
> > Nick
>
> > Well Nick is it true or not, or are you acceptable of millionaire as opposed
> > to billionaire. Seems to me either way Al has made himself a fortune whislt
> > saving the planet. The oil companies make a fortune which they tend to
> > inevst the bulk off in supplying us with heat. light and internet
>
> The source is of no import, the Gore man is a proven charlatan.  And
> the Telegraph probably has more balanced views, than say, the
> Guardian, which adopts a strangulation policy on commentators who
> don't subscribe to the AGW religion.
>
> CK- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It is the chosen newspaper of the right wing and it's audience would
include people who would like to think the majority are wrong about
climate change. Thus it writes for them. To express its views as
"balanced" would be a strange tenet at best! It's a newspaper. It has
views and an editorial policy. It sides with minority science on
climate change issues. So what?

date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:44:51 -0800 (PST) author: Dawlish