|
|
|
date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:36:28 -0700 (PDT),
group: uk.rec.shooting.clays
back
Following pair
Can't find any clarification on this. I understood that a following
pair was scored like a simultaneous pair, ie, if one bird is a no bird
then pair again, nothing established, not as one plus one, or on
report, where say, first bird killed second to count.
CPSA website not much help
date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
author: Joe Bridgehouse
|
Re: Following pair
"Joe Bridgehouse" wrote in message
news:600cced7-2360-4319-9e8a-067980b7d680@w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> Can't find any clarification on this. I understood that a following
> pair was scored like a simultaneous pair, ie, if one bird is a no bird
> then pair again, nothing established, not as one plus one, or on
> report, where say, first bird killed second to count.
> CPSA website not much help
Joe
You are correct - same as sim birds - it is in new Clay Shooting mag today
dave
date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:09:24 +0100
author: Dave
|
Re: Following pair
On 18 Sep, 21:09, "Dave" wrote:
> "Joe Bridgehouse" wrote in message
>
> news:600cced7-2360-4319-9e8a-067980b7d680@w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Can't find any clarification on this. I understood that a following
> > pair was scored like a simultaneous pair, ie, if one bird is a no bird
> > then pair again, nothing established, not as one plus one, or on
> > report, where say, first bird killed second to count.
> > CPSA website not much help
>
> Joe
>
> You are correct - same as sim birds - it is in new Clay Shooting mag today
>
> dave
Thats how I marked it, I was reffing at a charity shoot. Its a bit of
an eye opener refereeing, the blatant attempts to cheat, one guy
threatened me cos he killed the first bird and the second was a no
bird, so I called pair again, nothing established, and he then missed
both birds so I called pair lost, EEEE Dave its good fun clayshooting.
Think I'll do the CPSA refs course, the power is awesome.
date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
author: Joe Bridgehouse
|
Re: Following pair
"Joe Bridgehouse" wrote in message
news:248dea0a-8306-4677-b21b-e32675b4a6c8@o35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> On 18 Sep, 21:09, "Dave" wrote:
>> "Joe Bridgehouse" wrote in message
>>
>> news:600cced7-2360-4319-9e8a-067980b7d680@w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > Can't find any clarification on this. I understood that a following
>> > pair was scored like a simultaneous pair, ie, if one bird is a no bird
>> > then pair again, nothing established, not as one plus one, or on
>> > report, where say, first bird killed second to count.
>> > CPSA website not much help
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> You are correct - same as sim birds - it is in new Clay Shooting mag
>> today
>>
>> dave
>
> Thats how I marked it, I was reffing at a charity shoot. Its a bit of
> an eye opener refereeing, the blatant attempts to cheat, one guy
> threatened me cos he killed the first bird and the second was a no
> bird, so I called pair again, nothing established, and he then missed
> both birds so I called pair lost, EEEE Dave its good fun clayshooting.
> Think I'll do the CPSA refs course, the power is awesome.
joe
I had three birds on trot no bird - hit first everytime - got a good pair
and missed first bird Grrrrrrrrrr!!
Dave
date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:13:18 +0100
author: Dave
|
|
|