Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
rec-sporting
camping
caravanning
caving
climbing
cycling
dancing
driving
fishing.coarse
fishing.game
fishing.sea
motorcaravans
motorcycles
motorcycles.classic
motorcycles.trailriding
motorsport.misc
motorsport.oval-racing
sailing
scouting
shooting.clays
shooting.game
shooting.target
walking
  
 
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:56:32 -0000,    group: uk.rec.cycling        back       
Happi Monday   
Seriously, why do you bother with this place?  The vast majority of 
people are here for one of three reasons:

- They cycle (e.g. Danny Colyer).
- They hate motorists and like to pretend to be "pro-cycling" as a front 
for their car-hating (e.g. Chapman, Spindrift).
- They wish to correct the dishonest agenda-drive crap spouted by the 
car-haters (e.g. JNugent, Sir Jeremy).

You don't appear to fit any of those usual categories: instead, your 
main aims seem to be to call people from all sides "prick"s and to 
complain about urcm and its advocates in various ways.

What brought you here?  What do you get out of being here?  Are you 
going to stay?  Why would you when you seem to hate it (and everyone 
here) so much?  And why is it "Happi" rather than "Happy"?  Can we have 
some answers please?
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:56:32 -0000   author:   The Reverend Tom Crispinson rists

Re: Happi Monday   
> 
> What brought you here?  What do you get out of being here?  


You answer that one first - then come out of hiding
Chicken to put your name on the line and chicken shit is all that you 
come out with.

-- 
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:34:50 +0000   author:   Keitht KeithT

Re: Happi Monday   
The Reverend Tom Crispinson wrote:
> Seriously, why do you bother with this place?  The vast majority of 
> people are here for one of three reasons:
> 
> - They cycle (e.g. Danny Colyer).
> - They hate motorists and like to pretend to be "pro-cycling" as a front 
> for their car-hating (e.g. Chapman, Spindrift).
> - They wish to correct the dishonest agenda-drive crap spouted by the 
> car-haters (e.g. JNugent, Sir Jeremy).
> 
> You don't appear to fit any of those usual categories: instead, your 
> main aims seem to be to call people from all sides "prick"s and to 
> complain about urcm and its advocates in various ways.
> 
> What brought you here?  What do you get out of being here?  Are you 
> going to stay?  Why would you when you seem to hate it (and everyone 
> here) so much?  And why is it "Happi" rather than "Happy"?  Can we have 
> some answers please?

I am a cyclist and a motorist. I hate "cagers" and I detest "psycholists".

I have an interest in cycling (not psycholing) and discussing cycling 
matters.

I have nothing against URCM, but I do hate the fact that the tossers 
that wanted it continue to hang around here - yes they have a right to 
be here, but it is hypocritical in the extreme.

Most of the other questions - I don't know that answers to.

Have a nice day.

Happi
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:58:09 +0000   author:   Happi Monday

Re: Happi Monday   
Happi Monday wrote:
> The Reverend Tom Crispinson wrote:
>> Seriously, why do you bother with this place?  The vast majority of 
>> people are here for one of three reasons:
>>
>> - They cycle (e.g. Danny Colyer).
>> - They hate motorists and like to pretend to be "pro-cycling" as a 
>> front for their car-hating (e.g. Chapman, Spindrift).
>> - They wish to correct the dishonest agenda-drive crap spouted by the 
>> car-haters (e.g. JNugent, Sir Jeremy).
>>
>> You don't appear to fit any of those usual categories: instead, your 
>> main aims seem to be to call people from all sides "prick"s and to 
>> complain about urcm and its advocates in various ways.
>>
>> What brought you here?  What do you get out of being here?  Are you 
>> going to stay?  Why would you when you seem to hate it (and everyone 
>> here) so much?  And why is it "Happi" rather than "Happy"?  Can we 
>> have some answers please?
> 
> I am a cyclist and a motorist. I hate "cagers" and I detest "psycholists".
> 
> I have an interest in cycling (not psycholing) and discussing cycling 
> matters.
> 
> I have nothing against URCM, but I do hate the fact that the tossers 
> that wanted it continue to hang around here - yes they have a right to 
> be here, but it is hypocritical in the extreme.
> 
> Most of the other questions - I don't know that answers to.
> 
> Have a nice day.
> 
> Happi

I don't see any hypocrisy - that one needs explaining rather than just 
exclaiming.
If those who don't really have much interest in cycling, only it seems 
complaining about cyclists, are O.K. to post here then it shirley is 
also O.K. for others to post here. If anything, the hypocrisy comes from 
that direction.
-- 
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:34:59 +0000   author:   Keitht KeithT

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us