I mean apart from keitht, who is either *spectacularly* stupid, or very 
good at pretending to be spectacularly stupid (of course, he always 
makes out that it's the second one when he's caught out, but I have my 
doubts to say the least).

Does anyone genuinely think that Chapman didn't make the Lou Knee post 
where he called a poster a "piece of shit" (for daring to ask why some 
people hated motorists...Chapman doesn't like it when people talk about 
his car-hating)?  I'd like to think that even Chapman's most pathetic, 
non-independent-minded sycophant would have realised by now that he made 
that Lou Knee post, even if they're too scared of the odious fat 
fiftysomething to say so, but judging by how hopelessly incapable some 
of the morons are of seeing anything but good in Chapman, I'm by no 
means certain.  This thread will go some way towards determining just 
how much the rot has set in when it comes to Chapman's car-hating 
buddies (e.g. mile-"the law is the law, but only when it can be used 
against motorists, who I don't hate at all, honest"-burner) and their 
refusal to openly accept that their anti-motorist messiah is anything 
but perfect.

"Who cares?" = "I know Chapman made that post, and if one of my 
opponents had done it then I'd be making a fuss, but since my hero made 
it I'm going to downplay the importance."  Besides, anyone who really 
wanted the issue to go away once and for all would tell Chapman to stop 
lying and admit to making the post.  If it's so unimportant, why is he 
so reluctant to tell the truth about it?  (Can't answer that?  Oh dear.)  
Clearly he knows, along with his sucker-uppers, that that post puts him 
in a very bad light and shows him to be an utter hyporite on many 
levels.  That he and his followers therefore try to dismiss the matter 
shows their arrogance and their eagerness to suppress any fact which 
makes things awkward for them (another fact that they regularly try to 
suppress is that speed cameras kill people: it gets in the way of their 
anti-motorist agenda, so they just pretend it isn't so, and insult and 
try to censor anyone who dares to tell it like it is).

Chapman and his grovellers would be a lot less despised if they just 
came clean about the Lou Knee post and stopped this nonsense.  Surely 
Chapman realises that it's just this kind of thing that gets people's 
backs up so much: his point-blank refusal to admit to wrongdoing or take 
any blame no matter how obvious it is.  Doing that isn't "tough", it 
just makes you look like an arrogant fuckwit who won't admit when he's 
beaten, and no-one does that better than Chapman.  He should tell the 
truth about Lou Knee and then we can all move on.

Guy Chapman: Have you ever posted as Lou Knee?

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

> 
> Guy Chapman: Have you ever posted as Lou Knee?




Hi Judith, one of the eyes has fallen off of your sock puppet and it's 
looking silly.
-- 
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle

"Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote in message 
news:MPG.255a9e4666bbc9c989695@news.zen.co.uk...

(e.g. mile-"the law is the law, but only when it can be used
> against motorists, who I don't hate at all, honest"-burner)

Thank you Nuxxy for finally recognising me and holding me in the same high 
esteem as you do with your other cyberpals. Can I just correct you on this 
small point though. I have stated that "the law is the law" and that it 
should be applied to everyone and that (unpopular as it may be) also applies 
to pavement cyclists and RLJing cyclists and any other cyclist who rides in 
a dangerous and irresponsible manner.

Quite obviously drivers who break their speed limits should be convicted and 
I think you will find that most sane people will agree on this point. The 
point that does not seem to generate agreement is by how much they are 
allowed to break the limit before they get nicked. My own position is that 
the limit is an upper limit and should be respected so therefore if you 
break that limit you have commited a crime and that is where the line should 
be drawn.

BTW I have never posted as Lou Knee.

You can also call me on the phone in the middle of the night (if you wish) 
ranting and raving, the answerphone will take your call.

www.getalife.com might help you.

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:27:42 +0000, Keitht <KeithT> wrote:

>Hi Judith, one of the eyes has fallen off of your sock puppet and it's 
>looking silly.

It's Nuxx.  But he seems to have failed to notice that /lots/ of
people posted as Lou Knee.  The password was shared around.
 
Guy
-- 
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/urc
GPG public key at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public-key.txt

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:27:42 +0000, Keitht <KeithT> wrote:

>Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>
>> 
>> Guy Chapman: Have you ever posted as Lou Knee?
>
>
>
>
>Hi Judith, one of the eyes has fallen off of your sock puppet and it's 
>looking silly.


No sunshine- it is *you* is fucking silly.

--    
As a pedestrian, you're more likely to be hit and injured by a moped than by a cyclist. (Guy Chapman)
Absolute rubbish - please produce evidence  (Judith Smith)

Judith M Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:27:42 +0000, Keitht <KeithT> wrote:
> 
>> Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>>
>>> Guy Chapman: Have you ever posted as Lou Knee?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Judith, one of the eyes has fallen off of your sock puppet and it's 
>> looking silly.
> 
> 
> No sunshine- it is *you* is fucking silly.
> 

No sunshine - yup it's overcast today.

-- 
Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle

Judith M Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:27:42 +0000, Keitht <KeithT> wrote:
> 
>> Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
>>
>>> Guy Chapman: Have you ever posted as Lou Knee?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Judith, one of the eyes has fallen off of your sock puppet and it's 
>> looking silly.
> 
> 
> No sunshine- it is *you* is fucking silly.

And my dad's bigger than your dad.

    BugBear

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:26:52 -0000, "mileburner"
 wrote:

>
>"Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote in message 
>news:MPG.255a9e4666bbc9c989695@news.zen.co.uk...
>
>(e.g. mile-"the law is the law, but only when it can be used
>> against motorists, who I don't hate at all, honest"-burner)
>
>Thank you Nuxxy for finally recognising me and holding me in the same high 
>esteem as you do with your other cyberpals. Can I just correct you on this 
>small point though. I have stated that "the law is the law" and that it 
>should be applied to everyone and that (unpopular as it may be) also applies 
>to pavement cyclists and RLJing cyclists and any other cyclist who rides in 
>a dangerous and irresponsible manner.
>
>Quite obviously drivers who break their speed limits should be convicted and 
>I think you will find that most sane people will agree on this point. The 
>point that does not seem to generate agreement is by how much they are 
>allowed to break the limit before they get nicked. My own position is that 
>the limit is an upper limit and should be respected so therefore if you 
>break that limit you have commited a crime and that is where the line should 
>be drawn.
>
>BTW I have never posted as Lou Knee.


Jesus - you nearly gave me a heart attack.

I was reading your post  - for some reason thinking  it was made by
Chapman - I saw that and just couldn't believe it.

And then I realised the small error I had made.

He has never, ever denied making that original post.

I have no idea why.

He says he is a christian.

 
--          

I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets.
I would challenge judith to find the place where I said I encourage my children to wear helmets.
I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman)