http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm

Shaun wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm



Brilliant news!  -  which goes to prove, once again, that a Jury is 
essential in these matters.

As for PC Ommibongo....er, Onnibomi...er   (hang on, I'll check the 
spelling) Onwugbonu, I take it that he *will* be facing a charge of 
attempting to pervert the course of justice?

Shaun wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm

His version was almost certainly true. You can't account for juries

On Nov 3, 8:25 pm, shaun.jameson.s...@ntlwolrd.com (Shaun) wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm

Said the jury spokesperson...

"We 'aint havin' no nigger putting down two of our boys".

WM

Nigel Oldfield wrote:
> On Nov 3, 8:25 pm, shaun.jameson.s...@ntlwolrd.com (Shaun) wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm
>
> Said the jury spokesperson...
>
> "We 'aint havin' no nigger putting down two of our boys".

Amazing isn't it? Time after time after time I get complaints that police 
officers are 'above the law' and never have to face juries (which is 
nonsense of course). But then, when they do, and are acquitted, all the 
police haters are still not satisfied and assume the jury is thick or 
biased.

The police just cannot win can they? I think the only thing you lot would be 
satisfied with would be a lynch mob.

Kev

On 3 Nov, 20:45, "Ret." <xxx> wrote:
> Nigel Oldfield wrote:
> > On Nov 3, 8:25 pm, shaun.jameson.s...@ntlwolrd.com (Shaun) wrote:
> >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm
>
> > Said the jury spokesperson...
>
> > "We 'aint havin' no nigger putting down two of our boys".
>
> Amazing isn't it? Time after time after time I get complaints that police
> officers are 'above the law' and never have to face juries (which is
> nonsense of course). But then, when they do, and are acquitted, all the
> police haters are still not satisfied and assume the jury is thick or
> biased.
>
> The police just cannot win can they? I think the only thing you lot would be
> satisfied with would be a lynch mob.
>

And 3 weeks ago uk.legal predicted the result:-

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.legal/browse_frm/thread/d730a133dfaa2eb9/9e3e78d3bfdc38b7?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&q=Onwugbonu#

On Nov 3, 8:45 pm, "Ret." <xxx> wrote:
> Nigel Oldfield wrote:
> > On Nov 3, 8:25 pm, shaun.jameson.s...@ntlwolrd.com (Shaun) wrote:
> >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm
>
> > Said the jury spokesperson...
>
> > "We 'aint havin' no nigger putting down two of our boys".
>
> Amazing isn't it? Time after time after time I get complaints that police
> officers are 'above the law' and never have to face juries (which is
> nonsense of course). But then, when they do, and are acquitted, all the
> police haters are still not satisfied and assume the jury is thick or
> biased.
>
> The police just cannot win can they? I think the only thing you lot would be
> satisfied with would be a lynch mob.
>
> Kev

Read the stories fully and then see if you are so sure (although I
hold out for little change in your position).

WM

On Nov 3, 8:33 pm, The gods have made us mad 
wrote:
> Shaun wrote:
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm
>
> Brilliant news!  -  which goes to prove, once again, that a Jury is
> essential in these matters.
>
> As for PC Ommibongo....er, Onnibomi...er   (hang on, I'll check the
> spelling) Onwugbonu, I take it that he *will* be facing a charge of
> attempting to pervert the course of justice?

There is no way of knowing whether Onwugbonu lied or not!

The fact that a jury finds a defendant not guilty is not in itself
proof that any witness lied.

6 officers plus the alleged victim were in the van. 5 of them were
charged the 6th. gave  evidence for the prosecution. It therefore
boils down to the word of one "independent" witness against 5 for whom
an acquittal was in their personal  interests.

The jury were apparently  unable to resolve this dilemma and hence
find guilt beyond reasonable doubt. As instructed, they found not
guilty.

The question of Onwugbonu's testimony remains open. To charge him with
an attempt to pervert the course it would have to be shown beyond
reasonable doubt that he lied. A second jury would be presented with
exactly the same dilemma with probably the same result.

That is why Onwugbonu is unlikely to be so charged.

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:25:57 +0000, Shaun wrote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm

mr umbongo like in da congo...

yeah, well you are welcome to fuck off back there...

Mel Rowing wrote:
> On Nov 3, 8:33 pm, The gods have made us mad 
> wrote:
>> Shaun wrote:
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8340634.stm
>> Brilliant news!  -  which goes to prove, once again, that a Jury is
>> essential in these matters.
>>
>> As for PC Ommibongo....er, Onnibomi...er   (hang on, I'll check the
>> spelling) Onwugbonu, I take it that he *will* be facing a charge of
>> attempting to pervert the course of justice?
> 
> There is no way of knowing whether Onwugbonu lied or not!
> 
> The fact that a jury finds a defendant not guilty is not in itself
> proof that any witness lied.
> 
> 6 officers plus the alleged victim were in the van. 5 of them were
> charged the 6th. gave  evidence for the prosecution. It therefore
> boils down to the word of one "independent" witness against 5 for whom
> an acquittal was in their personal  interests.


Doubtless, making the accusation was very *much* in Omnibomni's interest!

Irrespective of the outcome of the rial, Omnimbomni will almost 
certainly now take extended 'sick leave', during which he will engage 
the services of the Black Plod's Association to press the matter of the 
racially motivated shunning that has taken place since Omnibomni 
courageously stood up against corrupt and racist fellow officers.

Result?, a very handsome out of court financial settlement, and a 
delighted Mr Omnibomi ginning from ear to ear...

Money for old rope.

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/727.html

On Nov 3, 10:06 pm, Special Care 
wrote:
> http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/727.html

The obvious solution?

Just stop accepting vaccines; tell the doctors of "modern medicine" to
go back to hell where they came from, and recognise that the only
basis for the vaccination fraud is money.

We saw this in the 1980s.

Why is it taking so long for you brain-dead shites out there to see it
too?

How long does it take for you to see that poison is poison?

There is money to be made.

And there is money to be made from a SICK population.

There is no money to be made from a healthy population.

Fucking idiots.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------http://www.nntpnews.net/f178/high-tide-mark-present-civilisation-11946433/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-W6td_EHsY

Hans Ruesch throwed us a lifeline in the 1980s, a rope to grab on to
pull us out of the pit we're in.

NOBODY CARED IN THE EARLY 1990s WHEN MILLY SCHAER-MANZOLI, CHRISTIAN
BERNAARD, PETER SINGER.... DESTROYED HANS RUESCH FINANCIALLY WITH
THOSE FAKE COURT CASES.

How could such a man be opposed?

What motive could you have for opposing Hans Ruesch?

On Nov 3, 10:23 pm, Special Care 
wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-W6td_EHsY
>
> Hans Ruesch throwed us a lifeline in the 1980s, a rope to grab on to
> pull us out of the pit we're in.
>
> NOBODY CARED IN THE EARLY 1990s WHEN MILLY SCHAER-MANZOLI, CHRISTIAN
> BERNAARD, PETER SINGER.... DESTROYED HANS RUESCH FINANCIALLY WITH
> THOSE FAKE COURT CASES.
>
> How could such a man be opposed?
>
> What motive could you have for opposing Hans Ruesch?

==============================================

You might also try reading the following:
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/2d869c3519f27b51?&q=GILLⰃ䘬

On Nov 3, 10:23 pm, Special Care 
wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-W6td_EHsY
>
> Hans Ruesch throwed us a lifeline in the 1980s, a rope to grab on to
> pull us out of the pit we're in.
>
> NOBODY CARED IN THE EARLY 1990s WHEN MILLY SCHAER-MANZOLI, CHRISTIAN
> BERNAARD, PETER SINGER.... DESTROYED HANS RUESCH FINANCIALLY WITH
> THOSE FAKE COURT CASES.
>
> How could such a man be opposed?
>
> What motive could you have for opposing Hans Ruesch?

maybe he was a wanker?

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:06:51 -0800, Special Care wrote:

> http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/727.html

The healthiest people are those whom have never been vaccinated - assuming
they didn't come down with the plague/got killed in a car crash/whatever.

On Nov 4, 9:31 am, Tony <Tony.Chamb...@NoSpam.Thanks> wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:06:51 -0800, Special Care wrote:
> >http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/727.html
>
> The healthiest people are those whom have never been vaccinated - assuming
> they didn't come down with the plague/got killed in a car crash/whatever.

assuming they did not get infected with polio, smallpox or
tuberculosis you could well be right.

On Nov 4, 8:57 am, "Augustus O'Muircheartaigh"
 wrote:
> On Nov 3, 10:23 pm, Special Care 
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-W6td_EHsY

>
> > How could such a man be opposed?
>
> > What motive could you have for opposing Hans Ruesch?
>
> maybe he was a wanker?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------After I discovered Hans Ruesch's books in 1984, I decided never again
to ingest vivisection-based "medicines" or vaccines.

People often tell me I am well preserved for my age, despite using
alcohol as an emotional anesthetic.

Modern medicine has developed techniques for keeping people alive
longer..... but in what state?
Is it much of a life, with - for example - an artificial hip -
straight out of the vivisection laboratories - giving you hell and
requiring constant pain relief medication?

Are the laboratory animals getting their revenge?

The people who live into old age in good health, and die a peaceful
death... do so at a safe distance from the pharmacies of the
vivisection syndicate.
http://vivisectionfraud.com/fraudpt2.html

Augustus O'Muircheartaigh wrote:
> On Nov 3, 10:23 pm, Special Care 
> wrote:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-W6td_EHsY

>> NOBODY CARED IN THE EARLY 1990s WHEN MILLY SCHAER-MANZOLI, CHRISTIAN
>> BERNAARD, PETER SINGER.... DESTROYED HANS RUESCH FINANCIALLY WITH
>> THOSE FAKE COURT CASES.

I cared!

On 4 Nov, 10:13, "Augustus O'Muircheartaigh"
 wrote:
> On Nov 4, 9:31 am, Tony <Tony.Chamb...@NoSpam.Thanks> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:06:51 -0800, Special Care wrote:
> > >http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/727.html
>
> > The healthiest people are those whom have never been vaccinated - assuming
> > they didn't come down with the plague/got killed in a car crash/whatever.
>
> assuming they did not get infected with polio, smallpox or
> tuberculosis you could well be right.

He argues that healthy people are healthy? Cool, I can accept that.