On 30 Sep, 16:15, g...@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:48:41 -0700 (PDT), Toom Tabard
>
>
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> >On 29 Sep, 10:42, g...@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:20:45 -0700 (PDT), Toom Tabard
>
> >>  wrote:
> >> >On 28 Sep, 19:54, g...@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:53:57 -0700 (PDT), Toom Tabard
>
> >> >>  wrote:
> >> >> >On 25 Sep, 14:39, g...@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
> >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:07:49 -0700 (PDT), Toom Tabard
> >> >> >> >On 25 Sep, 10:54, g...@gmail.com (Graz) wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >You are the one saying these limits aren't in the policy and you only
> >> >> >> >find out when you check - however you've yet to show even one policy
> >> >> >> >or name one company which doesn't clearly specify geographical limits.
> >> >> >> >We're waiting....is there a problem?
>
> >> >> >> Keep waiting. =A0I'll tell you if there's a problem.-
>
> >> >> >We're still waiting for your example of a standard motor policy with
> >> >> >no specified geographical limits. Can you point us to one.
>
> >> >> No specified geographical limits for what?
>
> >> >You were the one who raised the issue. So absolutely no evidence for
> >> >you claim then - but we knew that.
>
> >> Remind me - which issue?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >Check back on thread - you can provide no evidence, therefore, as in
> >court, you lose.
>
> That's not much of a cross-examination.  You lose.- Hide quoted text -
>
 No, because if you have no evidence to support a ludicrous claim,
then you lose sunbeam.

Toom