On Sep 28, 12:35 am, NOSPAM...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:09:32 -0700 (PDT), Webmanager_CritEst
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> >On Sep 27, 8:55 pm, johannes  wrote:
> >> Webmanager_CritEst wrote:
>
> >> > On Sep 27, 6:11 pm, Paul Hyett <p...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 at 05:10:07, Webmanager_CritEst
> >> > >  wrote in uk.legal :
>
> >> > > >'It's better that 10 guilty men go free than one innocent man be
> >> > > >wrongly convicted'
>
> >> > > >Judges should order more retrials over unsafe convictions, says
> >> > > >criminal review chief
>
> >> > > >By Robert Verkaik, Law Editor
> >> > > >Saturday, 27 September 2008
>
> >> > > >The country's top appeal judges are failing to correct miscarriages of
> >> > > >justice where they suspect the jury has come to a wrong verdict, the
> >> > > >head of the body charged with investigating wrongful convictions has
> >> > > >warned.
>
> >> > > ISTM he's missed the whole point of the jury system...
> >> > > --
> >> > > Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
>
> >> > It is the best we have at the moment.
>
> >> Obviously. Do we have more than one jury system at the moment?
>
> >Not to my knowledge, do we?
>
> >WM
>
> Check your posting(s) :-)

I have, do we?

WM