On Aug 30, 10:53 pm, The Real Doctor 
wrote:
> On 30 Aug, 17:08, Webmanager_CritEst  wrote:
>
> > "You - and he and
> > she - can hardly be surprised that that does not make him Guest Number
> > One at all the local childrens' parties."
>
> > Why not?
>
> > What are the implications in your (and others) beliefs?
>
> That someone who has a criminal conviction involving indecent pictures
> of children may not be someone most or many parents would want playing
> with their children. Is that very surprising?
>
> Ian

Yes, I appreciate the opinion, I am asking you why that should be the
case?

WM