In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:01:11 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>
>>In article , Pat Gardiner
>> writes
>>>On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:22:34 +0100, Malcolm
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>snip<
>>>>>
>>>>You deliberately linked Karadic to British vets. Your belated wriggling
>>>>cannot change that.
>>>
>>>Everyone reading has the chance to read what I actually said and see
>>>if that is correct.
>>>
>>>...and I invite them to do just that.
>>>
>>On the day Karadic was extradited, you posted a message with the
>>deliberately lying heading: "Britain's bent government vets face
>>extradition", and your first substantive sentence, after a mention of
>>the BBC, read: "The former Bosnian Serb leader Karadzic is in the
>>Netherlands waiting his trial for genocide."
>>
>>No wonder you're wriggling and trying to pretend that's not the link
>>people were meant to make. Of course they were. If not, why the heading
>>and why start with Karadic? You're an utter disgrace.
>>
>>>I hope your realise that you are bringing Scottish Doctorates into
>>>disrepute.
>>>
>>More stupidity. There's no such thing as a "Scottish Doctorate".
>
>As I say, people can look back and see whether your constant attacks
>on me, over most of the last decade have any basis in fact.
>
>They can get to the original posting and don't have to rely on the
>interpretation of a man who:
>
>1.  snips selcetively and unfairly

A lie. Indeed, a whinging lie.

>2.  removes all his postings automatically after a few days

Saves cluttering up the internet. You should do the same.

>3.  refuses to give any details of his doctorate.
>
I have never once refused. I've have merely pointed out that anyone with 
a clue as to how to use search engines could find it with a handful of 
clicks.

You clearly don't have sufficient clue and so resort to lying about me - 
yet again.

Do try lying less often, Pat. It might (but it's probably too late) do 
wonders for your credibility.

>I don't know why you don't creep away quietly ;o)
>
>You know it makes sense.
>
More stupidity.

You've tried and failed to wriggle away from the most disgraceful post 
you've ever made.

-- 
Malcolm

On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:14:47 +0100, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , Pat Gardiner 
> writes
>>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:14:50 +0100, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Otherwise, it is very clear that you have realised that your wittering
>>>on about my PhD has merely made you look a fool and you are now trying
>>>to divert attention from your foolishness with more of your silly
>>>nonsense, this time about a non-existent "scam".
>>
>>You obviously have to deny it.
>
>What *exactly* am I supposed to be denying? Something weird and 
>ridiculous in your mind,  no doubt. Something you have dreamt up which 
>doesn't exist in reality, just in your fevered imagination.
>
>>You are probably able to get away with
>>it, if there is no known instances of previous attempts of
>>deliberately attempting to provoke libelous accusations (and following
>>through further - the details of which I'm not giving.)
>>
>Oh, you really are a very, very, silly little man, aren't you? Even by 
>your standards that is a ridiculous and stupid suggestion especially as 
>you have already libelled me a number of times, as you have UK vets and 
>other posters here. Indeed, I dare say that the above claim about me is 
>a libel in itself.
>
>Nothing is straightforward for you, is it? Everything has to be a "scam" 
>or a conspiracy theory or someone out to "get" you.
>
>>However, you are still jumping up and on on thin ice
>>
>Utter crap, Pat. That's all you are writing. Utter crap.
>
>>My advice remains - hop it!
>>
>And my advice is to sort yourself out.

I'm onto you Doctor Ogilvie.

You have a real doctorate and for some reason try, by your bizarre
behavior, stalking and harassment to giad the unwary into openly
accusing you of being a fake in order to allow you to threaten legal
action against them.

Presumably you hoped for an out-of-court settlement with a
confidentiality clause.

Well, that won't work anymore, if it ever did, will it?

-- 
Regards
Pat Gardiner
Release the results of testing British pigs for MRSA and C.Diff now!
www.go-self-sufficient.com  and http://animal-epidemics.blogspot.com/

In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>
>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:14:47 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>>
>>And my advice is to sort yourself out.
>
>I'm onto you Doctor Ogilvie.
>
ROFL!!!

>You have a real doctorate

Well done. You've got there at last. And about time, too. As a matter of 
interest, how many mouse clicks did it take you? The record is 6 :-))

So now you can put at rest all those doubts you expressed about it, led 
by the nose, as you were, by your friend "Pete". He is the only person 
to try to claim that I didn't have a PhD. You took your lead from him 
More fool you when the evidence was so readily available.

> and for some reason try, by your bizarre
>behavior, stalking and harassment

I have stalked no-one and harassed no-one. To claim otherwise is to 
libel me :-)

>to giad the unwary into openly
>accusing you of being a fake in order to allow you to threaten legal
>action against them.
>
Balderdash. Your penchant for conspiracy theories is hereby demonstrated 
clearly for all to see.

If you believe what you've just posted, you're an even bigger fool than 
I thought you were.

>Presumably you hoped for an out-of-court settlement with a
>confidentiality clause.
>
More complete and utter balderdash. Get real, Pat, and leave the 
conspiracy theories behind you. You dug yourself a hole by believing 
"Pete" and now all I can see are your desperate attempts to climb out of 
it.

>Well, that won't work anymore, if it ever did, will it?
>
There is indeed little chance of a complete invention of your weird mind 
ever working. The proof is in your endless posts.

My advice is still to sort yourself out.

-- 
Malcolm

Pat Gardiner wrote:
> 
> I'm onto you Doctor Ogilvie.
> 
> You have a real doctorate

Congratulations, you have made it at last.  Now perhaps you will 
apologies to Malcolm for continually implying that he did not have a 
doctorate.


> and for some reason try, by your bizarre behavior, stalking and harassment to giad the unwary into openly
> accusing you of being a fake in order to allow you to threaten legal
> action against them.
> 
> Presumably you hoped for an out-of-court settlement with a
> confidentiality clause.
> 
> Well, that won't work anymore, if it ever did, will it?

Another defamatory post from a man who *claims* to know about defamation 
and the law.  It is no wonder you have such difficulty convincing folk 
about your past and your present obsession.

-- 
Old Codger
e-mail use reply to field

What matters in politics is not what happens, but what you can make 
people believe has happened. [Janet Daley 27/8/2003]