In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:22:34 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>snip<
>>>
>>You deliberately linked Karadic to British vets. Your belated wriggling
>>cannot change that.
>
>Everyone reading has the chance to read what I actually said and see
>if that is correct.
>
>...and I invite them to do just that.
>
On the day Karadic was extradited, you posted a message with the 
deliberately lying heading: "Britain's bent government vets face 
extradition", and your first substantive sentence, after a mention of 
the BBC, read: "The former Bosnian Serb leader Karadzic is in the 
Netherlands waiting his trial for genocide."

No wonder you're wriggling and trying to pretend that's not the link 
people were meant to make. Of course they were. If not, why the heading 
and why start with Karadic? You're an utter disgrace.

>I hope your realise that you are bringing Scottish Doctorates into
>disrepute.
>
More stupidity. There's no such thing as a "Scottish Doctorate".

-- 
Malcolm

On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:14:50 +0100, Malcolm
 wrote:

>
>In article , Pat Gardiner 
> writes
>>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 08:18:59 +0100, Malcolm
>> wrote:
>>>In article , Pat Gardiner
>>> writes
>>>
>>>>If anyone emails me privately, I can send them a copy.
>>>
>>>ROFL!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>You funny little man :-))))))
>>
>>Unless I'm very much mistaken this is a modern variation of a scam not
>>unknown in ancient Rome.
>>
>You are, as so often, "very much mistaken". So completely mistaken that 
>it could only be you making the claim.
>
>Anything you don't understand or can't cope with has to become "a scam", 
>a conspiracy theory, or some other utter nonsense.
>
>>I would explain it in detail here, but for fear of it spreading
>>through the internet like another virus and becoming endemic in
>>somewhere further from the law than Britain.
>>
>Pathetic nonsense yet again. There is nothing to explain. If you think 
>there is, then you have made it up.
>
>>On your bike Ogilvie. You have been rumbled and if I spot you trying
>>it on with anyone else, they will get a private email, telling them
>>exactly how to turn the tables.
>>
>What on earth are you talking about now? It's clearly rubbish, whatever 
>it is. Just more blethering combined with your usual nasty little 
>threats.
>
>>Your stalking and abuse had a purpose. You are not so completely
>>stupid as you appear or you had picked it up from someone else and are
>>simply copying a get rich quick scheme.
>>
>More complete and utter balderdash from a master of it.
>
>>Now hop it. No easy money from me.
>>
>What????
>
>If you think I am trying to get money from you or anyone else, produce 
>your proof. As you won't be able to, withdraw the claim.
>
>Otherwise, it is very clear that you have realised that your wittering 
>on about my PhD has merely made you look a fool and you are now trying 
>to divert attention from your foolishness with more of your silly 
>nonsense, this time about a non-existent "scam".

You obviously have to deny it. You are probably able to get away with
it, if there is no known instances of previous attempts of
deliberately attempting to provoke libelous accusations (and following
through further - the details of which I'm not giving.)

However, you are still jumping up and on on thin ice

My advice remains - hop it!

-- 
Regards
Pat Gardiner
Release the results of testing British pigs for MRSA and C.Diff now!
www.go-self-sufficient.com  and http://animal-epidemics.blogspot.com/

In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:14:50 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>Otherwise, it is very clear that you have realised that your wittering
>>on about my PhD has merely made you look a fool and you are now trying
>>to divert attention from your foolishness with more of your silly
>>nonsense, this time about a non-existent "scam".
>
>You obviously have to deny it.

What *exactly* am I supposed to be denying? Something weird and 
ridiculous in your mind,  no doubt. Something you have dreamt up which 
doesn't exist in reality, just in your fevered imagination.

>You are probably able to get away with
>it, if there is no known instances of previous attempts of
>deliberately attempting to provoke libelous accusations (and following
>through further - the details of which I'm not giving.)
>
Oh, you really are a very, very, silly little man, aren't you? Even by 
your standards that is a ridiculous and stupid suggestion especially as 
you have already libelled me a number of times, as you have UK vets and 
other posters here. Indeed, I dare say that the above claim about me is 
a libel in itself.

Nothing is straightforward for you, is it? Everything has to be a "scam" 
or a conspiracy theory or someone out to "get" you.

>However, you are still jumping up and on on thin ice
>
Utter crap, Pat. That's all you are writing. Utter crap.

>My advice remains - hop it!
>
And my advice is to sort yourself out.

-- 
Malcolm