In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:40:38 +0100, Malcolm
> wrote:
>
>>snip<
>>
>>All this wittering on about total irrelevancies would appear to indicate
>>that you have no evidence of any epidemic in 1999. Why couldn't you have
>>said so in the first place instead of repeatedly claiming that there was
>>an epidemic that year?
>
>Defra and some pig people will be reading and they know not only that
>I'm right, but are not quite sure how much I know and how I know. That
>suits me fine.

You cannot possibly know whether or not Defra or anyone else knows 
whether that you are right. So this is just yet another your claims 
without evidence.

On the other hand, have you considered that they might be 100% sure from 
you posts what you think you know and regard it as of absolutely no 
importance.

>>
>>BTW, I'm still waiting for you to withdraw your utterly disgraceful post
>>comparing the actions of Karadic with your alleged claims about UK vets.
>>That, more than anything you've ever posted, reveals the total extent to
>>which your self-confessed obsession has taken you over and destroyed
>>your sense of proportion.
>>
>>Shame on you for that post.
>
>Well that blatant misrepresentation will make them quiver at the
>knees, until  they will go back and realise it is only poor old
>Ogilvie trying to drum up some self-publicity.
>
>You are a sceaming tabloid headline with a completly  different story
>underneath.
>
More stupidity from you. You really can't take criticism or correction, 
can you, even when you are blatantly wrong and everyone knows this 
except you?

You made an utterly disgraceful comparison which merely serves to show 
exactly what kind of person you are and to what lengths your 
self-confessed obsession has driven you.

-- 
Malcolm

On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:59:11 +0100, Old Codger
 wrote:

>Pat Gardiner wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:44:50 +0100, Malcolm
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> All readers of this ng will doubtless take note of this behaviour of 
>>> yours.
>> 
>> I'm sure that the investigators into the origins of Britain;s constant
>> animal and human health crises will carefully follow this thread
>
>Irrelevant in relation to the post to which you are responding.  In any 
>event, in the most unlikely event that anyone in authority seriously 
>attempts to read this thread they will soon appreciate that your posts 
>are virtually meaningless.

I suppose I should talk to you publicly since all your former friends,
seem very sensibly, to be giving you a wide berth for obvious reasons.
>
>> and wonder why such an eminent academic should spend so many years
>> stalking, harassing and constantly misrepresenting someone complaining
>> about state veterinary corruption.
>
>What they will wonder, assuming they can be bothered to read much of 
>your rubbish in this thread, is why "such an eminent academic" is 
>wasting his time trying to correct someone who cannot even appreciate 
>that he might not know what he is talking about.

I can understand his English well enough, it his motives that baffle
me, although I suspect at last I'm getting very much closer to some.
>
>> I'm certainly curious.
>
>That is an encouraging sign.  Just convert that in to a learning experience.

Indeed.
>
>> Perhaps you would like to mention the University here and the URL of
>> your website?
>
>You are an incompetent buffoon Pat.  Malcolm has told you he has a 
>website.  The very simplest of Google searches finds it and, as Malcolm 
>has stated, the information you require is on the first page.  If you 
>can actually manage that most simple of searches, and it should be 
>within the capacity of even you, you will have to agree that the 
>awarding institution is amongst the most eminent.

I know he has a website. The point is that he can take the website
down, or alter it at any time, just as he does with his posts here.

I wanted him to confirm its existence here, where he can't tamper with
my quoting his post, with the information, that he says he got his
degree from Bristol and when.

The reasons are obvious. I'm now interested to see him do it.

I will then tell you what was going on. If he won't post, you will
live in additional ignorance.

Oddly enough although I checked it out earlier this evening, at 2315
it was unavailable. I expect he is performing his first routine
maintenance since December 2006, but I have saved a copy.

If anyone emails me privately, I can send them a copy.
>
>> I've noticed others asking you for the same information many times in
>> the past were always met with a hail of abuse.
>
>I do not recall "others asking you (Malcolm) for the same information 
>many times in the past".  Perhaps you are referring to Pete or Burkie 
>mimicking your posts.  If you are referring to someone else, please 
>state who.  However, I believe this is just another of your deliberate lies.

Now, don't be rude. I might well be the only one here prepared, on the
odd occasion, to talk to you. You might well need my help.
>
>> I will make sure the information is carefully preserved safe from
>> removal.
>
>Oh goody!

Indeed.

Now be a good boy, don't interupt a retired shipbroker when he is at
work.

-- 
Regards
Pat Gardiner
Release the results of testing British pigs for MRSA and C.Diff now!
www.go-self-sufficient.com  and http://animal-epidemics.blogspot.com/

In article , Pat Gardiner 
 writes
>On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:59:11 +0100, Old Codger
> wrote:
>
>>
>>You are an incompetent buffoon Pat.  Malcolm has told you he has a
>>website.  The very simplest of Google searches finds it and, as Malcolm
>>has stated, the information you require is on the first page.  If you
>>can actually manage that most simple of searches, and it should be
>>within the capacity of even you, you will have to agree that the
>>awarding institution is amongst the most eminent.
>
>I know he has a website. The point is that he can take the website
>down, or alter it at any time, just as he does with his posts here.
>
I never "take down" or "alter" my posts here. Another Pat lie.

>I wanted him to confirm its existence here, where he can't tamper with
>my quoting his post, with the information, that he says he got his
>degree from Bristol and when.
>
>The reasons are obvious.

ROFL!!!

You just get weirder and weirder.

> I'm now interested to see him do it.
>
>I will then tell you what was going on.

More ROFL!!!

>If he won't post, you will
>live in additional ignorance.
>
>Oddly enough although I checked it out earlier this evening, at 2315
>it was unavailable. I expect he is performing his first routine
>maintenance since December 2006, but I have saved a copy.
>
Bwahahahahaha!!!!!

I may not have altered the first page since December 2006 (which it 
clearly states at the foot of the page so well done for being able to 
read that) but there's another page (perhaps you didn't find it) which 
equally clearly states that it was updated in March 2008. You'd better 
go back and check. The website is available as I type this and, if it 
was unavailable earlier, I suggest the fault was at your end as Demon 
have not reported any problems with webpage access overnight.

>If anyone emails me privately, I can send them a copy.

ROFL!!!!!!!

You funny little man :-))))))

-- 
Malcolm

Pat Gardiner wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:59:11 +0100, Old Codger 
>  wrote:
> 
>> I do not recall "others asking you (Malcolm) for the same
>> information many times in the past".  Perhaps you are referring to
>> Pete or Burkie mimicking your posts.  If you are referring to
>> someone else, please state who.  However, I believe this is just
>> another of your deliberate lies.
> 
> Now, don't be rude.

Ah, I was right, you were deliberately lying.

> I might well be the only one here prepared, on the odd occasion, to talk to you.

Fantasy again Pat?

> You might well need my help.

I cannot imagine any circumstances in which I would "Need your help".

> Now be a good boy, don't interupt a retired shipbroker when he is at 
> work.

That really is a joke.

-- 
Old Codger
e-mail use reply to field

What matters in politics is not what happens, but what you can make
people believe has happened. [Janet Daley 27/8/2003]