Smile. Trick or Treat

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9owk50Iz3w&feature=player_embedded

"Barbara"  wrote in message 
news:lqbme5hsbcs1tj2c9e4p8up0m255567krb@4ax.com...
> Smile. Trick or Treat
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9owk50Iz3w&feature=player_embedded
>

Anyone saying trick or treat at my door will get hosed down with a power 
washer
this year.  I can't stand motability cars full of rude children from bad 
backgrounds
doing whole areas.

Roger  wrote
>
>"Barbara"  wrote in message 
>news:lqbme5hsbcs1tj2c9e4p8up0m255567krb@4ax.com...
>> Smile. Trick or Treat
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9owk50Iz3w&feature=player_embedded
>>
>Anyone saying trick or treat at my door will get hosed down with a power 
>washer
>this year.  I can't stand motability cars full of rude children from bad 
>backgrounds
>doing whole areas.
>
I'm so glad I rigged a trap door above my cesspit.
-- 
Roger Hunt

On Oct 30, 9:45 pm, Roger Hunt  wrote:
> Roger  wrote
>
> >"Barbara"  wrote in message
> >news:lqbme5hsbcs1tj2c9e4p8up0m255567krb@4ax.com...
> >> Smile. Trick or Treat
>
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9owk50Iz3w&feature=player_embedded
>
> >Anyone saying trick or treat at my door will get hosed down with a power
> >washer
> >this year.  I can't stand motability cars full of rude children from bad
> >backgrounds
> >doing whole areas.
>
> I'm so glad I rigged a trap door above my cesspit.
> --
> Roger Hunt

Shame on you, I would give the little dears some chocolate.

http://www.chemistdirect.co.uk/ex-lax_v_1795.html


PeterG

PeterG  wrote
>On Oct 30, 9:45 pm, Roger Hunt  wrote:
>> Roger  wrote
>> >"Barbara"  wrote in message
>> >news:lqbme5hsbcs1tj2c9e4p8up0m255567krb@4ax.com...
>> >> Smile. Trick or Treat
>>
>> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9owk50Iz3w&feature=player_embedded
>>
>> >Anyone saying trick or treat at my door will get hosed down with a power
>> >washer
>> >this year.  I can't stand motability cars full of rude children from bad
>> >backgrounds
>> >doing whole areas.
>>
>> I'm so glad I rigged a trap door above my cesspit.
>
>Shame on you, I would give the little dears some chocolate.
>
>http://www.chemistdirect.co.uk/ex-lax_v_1795.html
>
The price is outrajus! That's it. I've had enough of peddling cocaine -
not enough money in it. I'm going into dealing Ex-Lax.
-- 
Roger Hunt

On 30 Oct, 23:42, PeterG  wrote:
> On Oct 30, 9:45 pm, Roger Hunt  wrote:
> > I'm so glad I rigged a trap door above my cesspit.
> Shame on you, I would give the little dears some chocolate.
> http://www.chemistdirect.co.uk/ex-lax_v_1795.html

Ordinary chocolate is bad enough for them:

http://www.charismamag.com/index.php/prophetic-insight/23723-the-danger-of-celebrating-halloween
"most of the candy sold during this season has been dedicated and
prayed over by witches. ...I do not buy candy during the Halloween
season. Curses are sent through the tricks and treats of the innocent
whether they get it by going door to door or by purchasing it from the
local grocery store. The demons cannot tell the difference."

The article was originally posted on www.cbn.com and has been widely
satirised.  CBN have pulled it, but it is still found by their search
engine.  One satarist has pointed out that there is positive
discrimination for empolying witches to work in food factories because
they always wear a hat, and can sweep up afterwards.

Kimberly Daniels is a well-publicised fruitcake with several
successful books to her name.

Roger wrote:
> "Barbara"  wrote in message 
> news:lqbme5hsbcs1tj2c9e4p8up0m255567krb@4ax.com...
>> Smile. Trick or Treat
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9owk50Iz3w&feature=player_embedded
>>
> 
> Anyone saying trick or treat at my door will get hosed down with a power 
> washer this year.  I can't stand motability cars full of rude children from bad 
> backgrounds doing whole areas.

What have you got against Motability cars?

"Roger"  gargled a mouthful of St Estephe
and gave us:

< some stuff.>

What?   WHAT? A stranger.....from the outside! OOOOOOOh......

I should like to point out that "Roger"  the Twenty De Nospam from
planet  ntl world is in no way the same as this Roger.

Welcome , pull up a Blue Circle and mind your cardy on
that.......never mind I expect it was old?


You'll have had your tea by noo ?

Roger (this one)

Dashitty dash space  and.........SIG!

-- 





\\
 <|:-) Helga? When sooner or later its over...& I don't want to miss you tonight... 
//

roger. whinwhistle <despam@?.net> wrote
>"Roger"  gargled a mouthful of St Estephe
>and gave us:
>
>< some stuff.>
>
>What?   WHAT? A stranger.....from the outside! OOOOOOOh......
>
>I should like to point out that "Roger"  the Twenty De Nospam from
>planet  ntl world is in no way the same as this Roger.
>
>Welcome , pull up a Blue Circle and mind your cardy on
>that.......never mind I expect it was old?
>
>You'll have had your tea by noo ?
>
>Roger (this one)
>
>Dashitty dash space  and.........SIG!
>
Yes indeedy - the hoards of spamless Rogers are quietly assembling
before lunching the November Revulsion sorry Revolution.
Ah-hahahaha ...
-- 
Roger Hunt

The message <IBjn1UAOqx+KFwy4@nospam.demon.co.uk>
from Roger Hunt  contains these words:

> spamless 

Talking of which, I've been getting SMS spam lately. Not "blatant" spam
as such, but odd messages that just sound too silly to be real. And not
from anyone I know, of course.

-- 
Skipweasel
Not to be sniffed at.

Skipweasel  wrote
>The message <IBjn1UAOqx+KFwy4@nospam.demon.co.uk>
>from Roger Hunt  contains these words:
>
>> spamless 
>
>Talking of which, I've been getting SMS spam lately. Not "blatant" spam
>as such, but odd messages that just sound too silly to be real. 

As silly even as some messages here? Scary.
>And not
>from anyone I know, of course.
>
I receive very little, but a week ago Turnpike rejected a big lump 
of about 800 emails addressed to ~800 hotmail (or was it gmail?)
accounts but still somehow landing in my Demon mailbox, and purportedly
from ~800 other Demon accounts. Very oddly back-to-front.
-- 
Roger Hunt

In uk.rec.sheds,  (Roger Hunt) wrote in
<zSdZRLA3Wy+KFwFj@nospam.demon.co.uk>::

>Skipweasel  wrote
>>The message <IBjn1UAOqx+KFwy4@nospam.demon.co.uk>
>>from Roger Hunt  contains these words:
>>
>>> spamless 
>>
>>Talking of which, I've been getting SMS spam lately. Not "blatant" spam
>>as such, but odd messages that just sound too silly to be real. 
>
>As silly even as some messages here? Scary.
>>And not
>>from anyone I know, of course.
>>
>I receive very little, but a week ago Turnpike rejected a big lump 
>of about 800 emails addressed to ~800 hotmail (or was it gmail?)
>accounts but still somehow landing in my Demon mailbox, and purportedly
>from ~800 other Demon accounts. Very oddly back-to-front.

The "To" address does not (and often doesn't) match the "RCPT-TO"
address.  If you're with Demon, their mailserver offers the "*ENV"
extensions (or at least used to) so when you pull the emails, there
should be "X-ENV-TO" and "X-ENV-FROM" headers in the header block. Those
are what's used actually to route email around- it's just a like a real
letter; what it says on the envelope doesn't always match the content,
just as when your bank sends the wrong statement to a little old lady
somewhere.
-- 
Marc

Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go. (Oscar Wilde)

Znep  wrote
>In uk.rec.sheds,  (Roger Hunt) wrote in
><zSdZRLA3Wy+KFwFj@nospam.demon.co.uk>::
>>Skipweasel  wrote
>>>The message <IBjn1UAOqx+KFwy4@nospam.demon.co.uk>
>>>from Roger Hunt  contains these words:
>>>
>>>> spamless 
>>>
>>>Talking of which, I've been getting SMS spam lately. Not "blatant" spam
>>>as such, but odd messages that just sound too silly to be real. 
>>
>>As silly even as some messages here? Scary.
>>>And not
>>>from anyone I know, of course.
>>>
>>I receive very little, but a week ago Turnpike rejected a big lump 
>>of about 800 emails addressed to ~800 hotmail (or was it gmail?)
>>accounts but still somehow landing in my Demon mailbox, and purportedly
>>from ~800 other Demon accounts. Very oddly back-to-front.
>
>The "To" address does not (and often doesn't) match the "RCPT-TO"
>address.  If you're with Demon, their mailserver offers the "*ENV"
>extensions (or at least used to) so when you pull the emails, there
>should be "X-ENV-TO" and "X-ENV-FROM" headers in the header block. Those
>are what's used actually to route email around- it's just a like a real
>letter; what it says on the envelope doesn't always match the content,
>just as when your bank sends the wrong statement to a little old lady
>somewhere.

Thanks. I never look at the stuff - my Turnpike mailbox has a whitelist
of One - the rest is routed into the void.
-- 
Roger Hunt

In uk.rec.sheds,  (Roger Hunt) wrote in
<$jZKdKAkaz+KFwXi@nospam.demon.co.uk>::

>Znep  wrote
>>In uk.rec.sheds,  (Roger Hunt) wrote in
>><zSdZRLA3Wy+KFwFj@nospam.demon.co.uk>::
>>>Skipweasel  wrote
>>>>The message <IBjn1UAOqx+KFwy4@nospam.demon.co.uk>
>>>>from Roger Hunt  contains these words:
>>>>
>>>>> spamless 
>>>>
>>>>Talking of which, I've been getting SMS spam lately. Not "blatant" spam
>>>>as such, but odd messages that just sound too silly to be real. 
>>>
>>>As silly even as some messages here? Scary.
>>>>And not
>>>>from anyone I know, of course.
>>>>
>>>I receive very little, but a week ago Turnpike rejected a big lump 
>>>of about 800 emails addressed to ~800 hotmail (or was it gmail?)
>>>accounts but still somehow landing in my Demon mailbox, and purportedly
>>>from ~800 other Demon accounts. Very oddly back-to-front.
>>
>>The "To" address does not (and often doesn't) match the "RCPT-TO"
>>address.  If you're with Demon, their mailserver offers the "*ENV"
>>extensions (or at least used to) so when you pull the emails, there
>>should be "X-ENV-TO" and "X-ENV-FROM" headers in the header block. Those
>>are what's used actually to route email around- it's just a like a real
>>letter; what it says on the envelope doesn't always match the content,
>>just as when your bank sends the wrong statement to a little old lady
>>somewhere.
>
>Thanks. I never look at the stuff - my Turnpike mailbox has a whitelist
>of One - the rest is routed into the void.

I meant "does not HAVE TO", of course, with which amendment my sentence
actually makes some sense.
-- 
Marc

"Poodles are space aliens who think they've disguised
 themselves as dogs."  - Paghat the Ratgirl