On 2 Nov 2009 14:22:27 GMT, Simon Brooke
<stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com> wrote:

>Now who's being disingenuous? If you and Guy had left her alone, she'd 
>have got bored months ago, and gone of to pursue her hysterical vendettas 
>somewhere else. But, no, not you - the inveterate last-word-havers.

I suspect this may have been true in the first weeks, but after it
settled in I don't think being ignored made any odds - as with Nuxx,
being ignored only really prompts more and more outrageous behaviour
in the hope of getting a rise from someone.

I've not counted what proportion of its posts get any response at all,
but it's been pretty close to zero percent from me for some time.  The
meta-debate is still hard for me to ignore, though.
 
Guy
-- 
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:44:53 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
 wrote:

>On 2 Nov 2009 14:22:27 GMT, Simon Brooke
><stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>Now who's being disingenuous? If you and Guy had left her alone, she'd 
>>have got bored months ago, and gone of to pursue her hysterical vendettas 
>>somewhere else. But, no, not you - the inveterate last-word-havers.
>
>I suspect this may have been true in the first weeks, but after it
>settled in I don't think being ignored made any odds - as with Nuxx,
>being ignored only really prompts more and more outrageous behaviour
>in the hope of getting a rise from someone.
>
>I've not counted what proportion of its posts get any response at all,
>but it's been pretty close to zero percent from me for some time.  The
>meta-debate is still hard for me to ignore, though.
> 
>Guy


Hello, hello Guy - now what about these silly moped figures you were
going to provide.

Any chance?

--    
As a pedestrian, you're more likely to be hit and injured by a moped than by a cyclist. (Guy Chapman)
Absolute rubbish - please produce evidence  (Judith Smith)