Very disappointing performance
We have possibly our worst ever european night and what do we get from you?
nothing.
zip.
radio silence.
Worst performance ever by the sellik ng?
Rangers aren't the only ones who should be taking a look at themselves this
morning.
date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:02:24 +0100
author: Fish Supper
|
Re: Very disappointing performance
Fish Supper wrote:
> We have possibly our worst ever european night and what do we get from you?
>
> nothing.
>
> zip.
>
> radio silence.
>
> Worst performance ever by the sellik ng?
>
> Rangers aren't the only ones who should be taking a look at themselves
> this morning.
Possibly just afraid want to hype it up before the inevitable SNAFU
against Hamburg... Also, do we want to consider that we can't beat a
side that was so thoroughly humped at home by an unpronounceable pub team?
Stew
date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:17:44 +0100
author: Stewart Smith
|
Re: Very disappointing performance
"Stewart Smith" wrote in message
news:hbmqko$q2t$1@scotsman.ed.ac.uk...
> Fish Supper wrote:
>> We have possibly our worst ever european night and what do we get from
>> you?
>>
>> nothing.
>>
>> zip.
>>
>> radio silence.
>>
>> Worst performance ever by the sellik ng?
>>
>> Rangers aren't the only ones who should be taking a look at themselves
>> this morning.
>
> Possibly just afraid want to hype it up before the inevitable SNAFU
> against Hamburg... Also, do we want to consider that we can't beat a side
> that was so thoroughly humped at home by an unpronounceable pub team?
>
> Stew
hate to pick you up on your grammar there, Stewbhoy, but you should have
said "we can't beat a pub team that was so thoroughly humped at home by an
unpronounceable side?"
date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:40:55 +0100
author: Fish Supper
|
Re: Very disappointing performance
Fish Supper wrote:
>
> "Stewart Smith" wrote in message
> news:hbmqko$q2t$1@scotsman.ed.ac.uk...
>> Fish Supper wrote:
>>> We have possibly our worst ever european night and what do we get
>>> from you?
>>>
>>> nothing.
>>>
>>> zip.
>>>
>>> radio silence.
>>>
>>> Worst performance ever by the sellik ng?
>>>
>>> Rangers aren't the only ones who should be taking a look at
>>> themselves this morning.
>>
>> Possibly just afraid want to hype it up before the inevitable SNAFU
>> against Hamburg... Also, do we want to consider that we can't beat a
>> side that was so thoroughly humped at home by an unpronounceable pub
>> team?
>>
>> Stew
>
> hate to pick you up on your grammar there, Stewbhoy, but you should have
> said "we can't beat a pub team that was so thoroughly humped at home by
> an unpronounceable side?"
;) For a moment there I thought you were going to pick me up on the
brain freeze that apparently happened when writing the first sentence...
Anyway, I hope you don't get humped out of Europe completely. I'd
hate for Rangers to be concentrating on the league!
Stew
date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:54:24 +0100
author: Stewart Smith
|
Re: Very disappointing performance
"Fish Supper" wrote in
news:IqqdnYQEe6HEd0PXnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d@bt.com:
> We have possibly our worst ever european night and what do we get from
> you?
>
> nothing.
>
> zip.
>
> radio silence.
>
> Worst performance ever by the sellik ng?
>
> Rangers aren't the only ones who should be taking a look at themselves
> this morning.
Shocking eh? I go into hiding expecting the intolerable barrage of abuse
you'd expect in such circumstances only to remember it's not five years
ago. Seems the current denizens of the Celtic NG are more concerned with
getting others to tell them how to work their own computers than getting
ladled in to us.
Disappointing does not begin to cover it. It's fucking pathetic...
date: 31 Oct 2009 02:11:25 GMT
author: guitierrez
|
Re: Very disappointing performance
"guitierrez" wrote in message
news:Xns9CB516477272Fguit@130.133.1.4...
> "Fish Supper" wrote in
> news:IqqdnYQEe6HEd0PXnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> We have possibly our worst ever european night and what do we get from
>> you?
>>
>> nothing.
>>
>> zip.
>>
>> radio silence.
>>
>> Worst performance ever by the sellik ng?
>>
>> Rangers aren't the only ones who should be taking a look at themselves
>> this morning.
>
> Shocking eh? I go into hiding expecting the intolerable barrage of abuse
> you'd expect in such circumstances only to remember it's not five years
> ago. Seems the current denizens of the Celtic NG are more concerned with
> getting others to tell them how to work their own computers than getting
> ladled in to us.
> Disappointing does not begin to cover it. It's fucking pathetic...
it's a poor performance indeed, guiterrez - poor, very poor.
I like to think that if they were in our position, we'd be ladelling into
them in a gang-bang stylee.
The worrying thing for them is that even in our, ahhhemm reduced
circumstances, we are still in a better position to win the title than they
are. Really. I mean which one of them would you have playing for us?
date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:24:18 -0000
author: Fish Supper
|
Re: Very disappointing performance
"Fish Supper" wrote in
news:Q7adnUoMsvvGSHHXnZ2dnUVZ8omdnZ2d@bt.com:
> Really. I mean which one of them would you have playing for
> us?
Well there's none is there. I'm struggling to think of a Celtic team in my
lifetime when I wouldn't have at least one of their players. I sense
Mowbray may be in for a rather torrid New Year at the hands of the Celtic
support. Poor guy...
date: 2 Nov 2009 00:17:01 GMT
author: guitierrez
|