****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****


I got a new job. It's pretty good.

I don't think it will make any difference to certain evil, prejudiced, 
hateful bigots somehow though. :-/

Worst Anniversary Ever.


8===================================D - - -


This week's match odds-me-do (7/11/09) (15:00 GMT unless otherwise stated):


                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY


Wolfs v Arse   (17:30 GMT)     9    5.2    1.4
Manc v Burnley    1.33    5.1    12
Spurs v Sundercunts    1.6    4.2    6.8
Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
Accrington v Salisbury    1.6      4    5.8
Hereford v Sutton Utd     1.49    3.7    7.5
Stockport v Tooting & Mitcham    1.32    5.8    11
Paulton v Norwich (12:45 GMT)    14    6.6    1.22




Deadline for teh betcunting:   12:44 GMT, 7/11/09

=~=================================


Last Wheek's Profits/Losses and This Wheek's Balances'n'shit:




Demo            159 ->  185 ->  186
TMAK            92  ->  84  ->  85
Roo             57  ->  70  ->  71
Joe             65  ->  69  ->  70
BTN             59  ->  67  ->  68
Aubrey Straw    63  ->  58  ->  59
Mikey           60  ->  58  ->  59
Os              58  ->  55  ->  56
Goalie          50  ->  49  ->  50
Chopsy          53  ->  45  ->  46
Sid             31  ->  45  ->  46
Martin          40  ->  43  ->  44
Kevin           43  ->  41  ->  42
CJM             30  ->  15  ->  16
Conlan          11  ->  9   ->  10
Cornelius       10  ->  6   ->  7
kullrad         1    FROZEN IN TIME






--
HTH, HAND, HoHY

"viva las BETCUNTS!!sex1!1!"  - Elvis P. Cuntcock...


http://uksf.org.uk/betcunt/'n'shit

Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:

> 
>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY

> Stockport v Tooting & Mitcham    1.32    5.8    11

BET: 1 Youk on the DRAW.

Sorry County.

C

Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:
> ****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****
> 
> 
> I got a new job. It's pretty good.
That really is good news. Glad to hear it.

> I don't think it will make any difference to certain evil, prejudiced, 
> hateful bigots somehow though. :-/
> 
I somehow doubt that much would.

> Spurs v Sundercunts    1.6    4.2    6.8
BET: 5 youks on teh Spurs to WIN (Home win)

> Martin          40  ->  43  ->  44

M

-- 
Martin:  Poster, large, helpful, SBL administrator.  Award-winning 
homebrewer and spreadshit maestro.  Last remaining Huddersfield fan on 
the planet.

* Sir Benjamin Nunn [2009-11-04 12:46] [uk.sport.football]:

> I got a new job. It's pretty good.

I hope it is ace.

> I don't think it will make any difference to certain evil, prejudiced, 
> hateful bigots somehow though. :-/

What about the nice, non-prejudiced, loving bigots?

> Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2

8Y on the home win, please.

> Sid             31  ->  45  ->  46


Sid
-- 
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
remove the espam bits to mail

"Chopsy"  wrote in message 
news:4af1d101$0$2539$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
> Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:
>
>>
>>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
>
>> Stockport v Tooting & Mitcham    1.32    5.8    11
>
> BET: 1 Youk on the DRAW.
>
> Sorry County.


I'd love it if we could get Stockport back down here for a replay.

That would really bring out the glory-hunter in me!

BTN

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
news:7le0fnF3d887gU1@mid.individual.net...

> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5


BET: Three (3) Youks on in-form Pompey please, Wrong Fan.

BTN

Sir Benjamin Nunn  wrote:
> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
> Conlan          11  ->  9   ->  10

Time to kill off the Pompey revival and the Blackcockburn collapse.
I'll have
BET: 5 youks on the Pompey

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> Sir Benjamin Nunn  wrote:
> 
>>Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
>>Conlan          11  ->  9   ->  10
> 
> 
> Time to kill off the Pompey revival and the Blackcockburn collapse.
> I'll have
> BET: 5 youks on the Pompey

It's very decent of you not to put the kibosh on one of my weekend draw 
bets.

Thank you.

If you ever need 2.39 cms of pleasure at your disposal.....

nigel  wrote:
> If you ever need 2.39 cms of pleasure at your disposal.....


... then I should phone up Poleson twice?

wrote in news:7lh1kfF3e5007U1
@mid.individual.net:

>> If you ever need 2.39 cms of pleasure at your disposal.....
> 
> 
> ... then I should phone up Poleson twice?
> 

Everyone should phone up Poleson twice Vicky, everyone.

-- 
Cheers, Os

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in
news:7le0fnF3d887gU1@mid.individual.net: 

> ****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****

> 
> 8===================================D - - -
> 
> 
> This week's match odds-me-do (7/11/09) (15:00 GMT unless otherwise
> stated): 
> 
> 
>                         HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
> 

What a horrible pile of shit

> Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2

BET: 2 Youks on teh DRAW please Captain Awesome.


-- 
Cheers, Os

"Osbourne Ruddock"  wrote in message 
news:Xns9CBBAA5494944strikeboyhotmailcom@130.133.1.4...
>  wrote in news:7lh1kfF3e5007U1
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>>> If you ever need 2.39 cms of pleasure at your disposal.....
>>
>>
>> ... then I should phone up Poleson twice?
>>
>
> Everyone should phone up Poleson twice Vicky, everyone.


I phoned up Poleson twice once.

BTN

Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:

>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
>
>Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2

BET:  I'll venture 6 Youks on a home win for Vile, please.

Sir Benjamin Nunn  wrote:
> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
> 
> Kevin           43  ->  41  ->  42

BET: 2 on the draw

On Nov 4, 6:46 pm, "Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote:

> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5

5 youks on the home win please.

--
Cornelius

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
news:7le0fnF3d887gU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> Manc v Burnley    1.33    5.1    12

In the hope that my betting luck might rub off onto the Mancs...

BET: 12 Youks on the HOME WIN.

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
> Sir Benjamin Nunn  wrote:
> 
>>Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
>>
>>Kevin           43  ->  41  ->  42
> 
> 
> BET: 2 on the draw

Heh!

Best of luck, daddy.

Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:

> 
> 
> I phoned up Poleson twice once.
> 
> BTN

I won't bother to ask up where you inserted the phones into Poleson.

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> nigel  wrote:
> 
>>If you ever need 2.39 cms of pleasure at your disposal.....
> 
> 
> 
> ... then I should phone up Poleson twice?

Stereo phone calls - you might be onto something there.

On 4 Nov, 18:46, "Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote:

> Spurs v Sundercunts    1.6    4.2    6.8

BET: 16 on Spurs to win please Jazz Mogul (HOME).

> TMAK            92  ->  84  ->  85

Cornelius  wrote:
>> Blackcockburn v Pompey ? ?2.02 ? ?3.6 ? ?4.5
> 5 youks on the home win please.

Did you wait to see what me and my dad put on first and figure it was a
bit of a banker?  ;-)

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> Cornelius  wrote:
> 
>>>Blackcockburn v Pompey ? ?2.02 ? ?3.6 ? ?4.5
>>
>>5 youks on the home win please.
> 
> 
> Did you wait to see what me and my dad put on first and figure it was a
> bit of a banker?  ;-)
> 

That raises the question of whether partcipants as a whole are 
frienemies, ie competing with each other to win and yet trying to get 
the net balance at the end of the season to represent a profit. If so, 
competitors choosing to bet on mutually exclusive outcomes is as bad an 
idea as buying eight lottery tickets to cover 48 of the 49 ball numbers.

nigel  wrote:
>> Did you wait to see what me and my dad put on first and figure it was a
>> bit of a banker?  ;-)
> 
> That raises the question of whether partcipants as a whole are 
> frienemies, ie competing with each other to win and yet trying to get 
> the net balance at the end of the season to represent a profit. If so, 
> competitors choosing to bet on mutually exclusive outcomes is as bad an 
> idea as buying eight lottery tickets to cover 48 of the 49 ball numbers.

I suspect you'd find that most people don't actually look at anyone
else's bet 90% of the time before making their own.

wrote in message 
news:7liuvjF3d6eagU1@mid.individual.net...
> I suspect you'd find that most people don't actually look at anyone
> else's bet 90% of the time before making their own.

I always look at everyone's bet before placing my own.  I promptly forget 
them again, of course, and make my own betcunt on a basis of superstition 
and guesswork, but the point is I do look at them.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan

Joe Horowitz wrote:

>  wrote in message 
> news:7liuvjF3d6eagU1@mid.individual.net...
> 
>>I suspect you'd find that most people don't actually look at anyone
>>else's bet 90% of the time before making their own.
> 
> 
> I always look at everyone's bet before placing my own.  I promptly forget 
> them again, of course, and make my own betcunt on a basis of superstition 
> and guesswork, but the point is I do look at them.

Only cunts would look at other people's bets and use the information to 
decide how to bet themselves.

Which I admit to doing once last year.

"nigel"  wrote in message 
news:W6CdncG1DbvkEWnXnZ2dnUVZ7tli4p2d@brightview.co.uk...
> Joe Horowitz wrote:
>> I always look at everyone's bet before placing my own.  I promptly forget 
>> them again, of course, and make my own betcunt on a basis of superstition 
>> and guesswork, but the point is I do look at them.
>
> Only cunts would look at other people's bets and use the information to 
> decide how to bet themselves.

What?  I've never heard you talk such shitetalk.

> Which I admit to doing once last year.

I did it lots of times towards the end of last year, and I'll do it lots of 
times towards the end of this year.  I'm pretty sure the entire point of the 
competition is to finish with the most Youks, so other people's betcunts 
become increasingly significant towards the end.  In the final week, they're 
everything.

Until week 30, though, I ignore them.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan

Joe Horowitz <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote:
> I did it lots of times towards the end of last year, and I'll do it lots of 
> times towards the end of this year.  I'm pretty sure the entire point of the 
> competition is to finish with the most Youks, so other people's betcunts 
> become increasingly significant towards the end.  In the final week, they're 
> everything.

I think I attribute more laziness to the world than it deserves.
Needs to try harder at not trying so hard.

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message
news:7le0fnF3d887gU1@mid.individual.net...
> ****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****
> I got a new job. It's pretty good.

Fantastic news.  Congratulations.

>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
> Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
> Joe             65  ->  69  ->  70

BET:  2 on teh Vile (home) please, Little Bo Peep.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
news:7le0fnF3d887gU1@mid.individual.net...
> I got a new job. It's pretty good.

That's fantastic news.  Congratulations, Ben.  You must be joyfully
appreciating the beauty of life and its untold riches.

> I don't think it will make any difference to certain evil, prejudiced, hateful bigots somehow 
> though. :-/
>
> Worst Anniversary Ever.

Oh.

> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
> Mikey           60  ->  58  ->  59

BET: 2 Youks on a Portsmouth win, please, Psycho Sid.


-- 
Mike

http://theheroicartoflosing.wordpress.com/

"Joe Horowitz" <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote in message 
news:ja0Jm.82676$KU2.40803@newsfe26.ams2...
> "nigel"  wrote in message 
> news:W6CdncG1DbvkEWnXnZ2dnUVZ7tli4p2d@brightview.co.uk...
>> Only cunts would look at other people's bets and use the information to decide how to bet 
>> themselves.
>
> What?  I've never heard you talk such shitetalk.

Oh, I have.  Lots of times.

>> Which I admit to doing once last year.
>
> I did it lots of times towards the end of last year, and I'll do it lots of times towards the end 
> of this year.  I'm pretty sure the entire point of the competition is to finish with the most 
> Youks, so other people's betcunts become increasingly significant towards the end.  In the final 
> week, they're everything.
>
> Until week 30, though, I ignore them.

Agree with most of this webpipe.  Other people's betcunts do
become more significant as the season draws to a close.  However,
that's not to say there aren't advantages to be found by studying other
betcunts throughout the season.

The perfect example is Ben.  Coventry are almost always listed in
the weekly odds.  Now, I know pretty much nothing about Coventry.
But Ben does.  And he bets on Coventry all the time, without ever
letting his heart rule his head in the way that most of us would.
Thus, replicating Ben's Coventry-based betcunts has been a decent
youk-winning strategy since the very first year of the SBL.


-- 
Mike

http://theheroicartoflosing.wordpress.com/

In message , Sir Benjamin Nunn 
 writes
>Hereford v Sutton Utd     1.49    3.7    7.5

Y 1 on the AWAY win please.

>Goalie          50  ->  49  ->  50

-- 
Goalie of the Century

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:46:12 -0000, "Sir Benjamin Nunn"
 wrote:

>****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****
>
>This week's match odds-me-do (7/11/09) (15:00 GMT unless otherwise stated):
>
>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
>Wolfs v Arse   (17:30 GMT)     9    5.2    1.4
>
>Deadline for teh betcunting:   12:44 GMT, 7/11/09
>
>Last Wheek's Profits/Losses and This Wheek's Balances'n'shit:
>
>Demo            159 ->  185 ->  186

BET: 80 youks on the Gunners to win.


-- 
Demosthenes
'I can't really recall much beyond that. My time in Youksef seems very transient, 
it's like a dream, or a wonderful land like Narnia. Except with glans everywhere.'

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
>> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
>> Conlan          11  ->  9   ->  10
> 
> Time to kill off the Pompey revival and the Blackcockburn collapse.
> I'll have
> BET: 5 youks on the Pompey

Cock.

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
> vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
> 
>>>Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
>>>Conlan          11  ->  9   ->  10
>>
>>Time to kill off the Pompey revival and the Blackcockburn collapse.
>>I'll have
>>BET: 5 youks on the Pompey
> 
> 
> Cock.

Hey, I lost real money on this fixture. Okay, not being a millionaire 
like Ben it was only pence, but they were real pence.

(Sorry, daddy, I think I jinxed your betcunt)

Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:
> 
> "Chopsy"  wrote in message 
> news:4af1d101$0$2539$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>> Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
>>
>>> Stockport v Tooting & Mitcham    1.32    5.8    11
>>
>> BET: 1 Youk on the DRAW.
>>
>> Sorry County.
> 
> 
> I'd love it if we could get Stockport back down here for a replay.
> 
> That would really bring out the glory-hunter in me!

Well, maybe next year.

C

nigel  wrote:
> Hey, I lost real money on this fixture. Okay, not being a millionaire 
> like Ben it was only pence, but they were real pence.

Me too.  :-<

Although very tempted to give it to CJM for his obvious "taking
one for the team", I think Sid must get the sexy award of the week.
And I think we all ought to apologise to Pompey, you know, just on
principle ...

1-4 Wolfs v Arse   (17:30 GMT)     9    5.2    1.4
3-3 Manc v Burnley    1.33    5.1    12
2-0 Spurs v Sundercunts    1.6    4.2    6.8
3-1 Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
5-1 Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
2-0 Hereford v Sutton Utd     1.49    3.7    7.5
5-0 Stockport v Tooting & Mitcham    1.32    5.8    11

Demo            186 ->  218 ->  219
TMAK            85  ->  95  ->  96
Joe             70  ->  72  ->  73
Roo             71
BTN             68  ->  65  ->  66
Aubrey Straw    59  ->  64  ->  65
Sid             46  ->  60  ->  61
Mikey           59  ->  57  ->  58
Os              56  ->  54  ->  55
Goalie          50  ->  49  ->  50
Martin          44  ->  46  ->  47
Chopsy          46  ->  45  ->  46
Kevin           42  ->  40  ->  41
Cornelius       7   ->  12  ->  13
Conlan          10  ->  5   ->  6
CJM             16  ->  4   ->  5
kullrad         1

> Stockport v Tooting & Mitcham    1.32    5.8    11
BET: 1 Youk on the DRAW.
Chopsy          53  ->  45  ->  46
LOSE.  46 - 1 = 45

> Spurs v Sundercunts    1.6    4.2    6.8
BET: 5 youks on teh Spurs to WIN (Home win)
Martin          40  ->  43  ->  44
WIN.  39 + (4 x 1.6) = 46

> Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
8Y on the home win, please.
Sid             31  ->  45  ->  46
WIN.  23 + (8 x 1.75) = 60

> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
BET: Three (3) Youks on in-form Pompey please, Wrong Fan.
BTN             59  ->  67  ->  68
LOSE.  68 - 3 = 65

> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
BET: 5 youks on the Pompey
Conlan          11  ->  9   ->  10
LOSE.  10 - 5 = 5

> Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
BET: 2 Youks on teh DRAW please Captain Awesome.
Os              58  ->  55  ->  56
LOSE.  56 - 2 = 54

>Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
BET:  I'll venture 6 Youks on a home win for Vile, please.
Aubrey Straw    63  ->  58  ->  59
WIN.  53 + (6 x 1.75) = 64

> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
> Kevin           43  ->  41  ->  42
BET: 2 on the draw
LOSE.   42 - 2 = 40

> Blackcockburn v Pompey =A0 =A02.02 =A0 =A03.6 =A0 =A04.5
5 youks on the home win please.
Cornelius       10  ->  6   ->  7
WIN.  2 + (5 x 2.02) = 12

> Manc v Burnley    1.33    5.1    12
BET: 12 Youks on the HOME WIN.
CJM             30  ->  15  ->  16
LOSE.  16 - 12 = 4

> Spurs v Sundercunts =A0 =A01.6 =A0 =A04.2 =A0 =A06.8
BET: 16 on Spurs to win please Jazz Mogul (HOME).
TMAK            92  ->  84  ->  85
WIN.  69 + (16 x 1.6) = 95

> Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
BET:  2 on teh Vile (home) please, Little Bo Peep.
Joe             65  ->  69  ->  70
WIN.  68 + (2 x 1.75) = 72

> Blackcockburn v Pompey    2.02    3.6    4.5
BET: 2 Youks on a Portsmouth win, please, Psycho Sid.
Mikey           60  ->  58  ->  59
LOSE.  59 - 2 = 57

>Hereford v Sutton Utd     1.49    3.7    7.5
Y 1 on the AWAY win please.
Goalie          50  ->  49  ->  50
LOSE.  50 - 1 = 49

>Wolfs v Arse   (17:30 GMT)     9    5.2    1.4
BET: 80 youks on the Gunners to win.
Demo            159 ->  185 ->  186
WIN.  106 + (80 x 1.4) = 218

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> Cornelius       7   ->  12  ->  13

>>Blackcockburn v Pompey =A0 =A02.02 =A0 =A03.6 =A0 =A04.5
> 
> 5 youks on the home win please.
> Cornelius       10  ->  6   ->  7
> WIN.  2 + (5 x 2.02) = 12

I'm sure you're flattered that someone bothered to read your post, but 
as my reward for spotting the above I want to know how much you won off 
Ben at pocker.

nigel  wrote:
>> Cornelius       7   ->  12  ->  13
> 
>>>Blackcockburn v Pompey =A0 =A02.02 =A0 =A03.6 =A0 =A04.5
>> 
>> 5 youks on the home win please.
>> Cornelius       10  ->  6   ->  7
>> WIN.  2 + (5 x 2.02) = 12
> 
> I'm sure you're flattered that someone bothered to read your post, but 
> as my reward for spotting the above 

Hmm.  My brain may be fuzzy, but I can't see what you've spotted.

> I want to know how much you won off Ben at pocker.

Not played him yet, although preliminary arrangements are being made.
We've already established that he will be thoroughly annoyed and hate
all of my friends/co-players.  Hands up anyone who is surprised?

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> 
> Hmm.  My brain may be fuzzy, but I can't see what you've spotted.
> 

No, you're brain is fine - mine is fuzzy. Just ignore me.

> 
> Not played him yet, although preliminary arrangements are being made.
> We've already established that he will be thoroughly annoyed and hate
> all of my friends/co-players.

Nothing like a bit of needle to make things even more interesting :)

> Hands up anyone who is surprised?

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> 
>> Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
> 8Y on the home win, please.
> Sid             31  ->  45  ->  46
> WIN.  23 + (8 x 1.75) = 60
> 
Er, mistress? I know Sid is sexy'n'all, but that calculation makes no 
sense in any universe I've ever been a part of.

M

-- 
Martin:  Poster, large, helpful, SBL administrator.  Award-winning 
homebrewer and spreadshit maestro.  Last remaining Huddersfield fan on 
the planet.

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
> 
>> Spurs v Sundercunts    1.6    4.2    6.8
> BET: 5 youks on teh Spurs to WIN (Home win)
> Martin          40  ->  43  ->  44
> WIN.  39 + (4 x 1.6) = 46
>
Oh, and while I'm at it, where did the extra youk on my bet disappear to?

I much prefer:
WIN.  39 + (5 x 1.6) = 47

Ta,

M

-- 
Martin:  Poster, large, helpful, SBL administrator.  Award-winning 
homebrewer and spreadshit maestro.  Last remaining Huddersfield fan on 
the planet.

nigel  wrote:
>> Hmm.  My brain may be fuzzy, but I can't see what you've spotted.
> No, you're brain is fine - mine is fuzzy. Just ignore me.

o ...k.

>> Not played him yet, although preliminary arrangements are being made.
>> We've already established that he will be thoroughly annoyed and hate
>> all of my friends/co-players.
> Nothing like a bit of needle to make things even more interesting :)

Indeed

>> Hands up anyone who is surprised?

Was that you not putting your hand up?

Mister M  wrote:
>>> Vile v Bolton    1.75    3.7    5.2
>> 8Y on the home win, please.
>> Sid             31  ->  45  ->  46
>> WIN.  23 + (8 x 1.75) = 60
> Er, mistress? I know Sid is sexy'n'all, but that calculation makes no 
> sense in any universe I've ever been a part of.

Er, yeah.  It kind of /does/ make sense in mine, bizarrely.
And it's what I thought Nigel may have been pointing at before
but he got the wrong post.  :-}  (hint: the 23 comes from 31-8)

WIN.  38 + (8 x 1.75) = 52

Better?

Mister M  wrote:
>>> Spurs v Sundercunts    1.6    4.2    6.8
>> BET: 5 youks on teh Spurs to WIN (Home win)
>> Martin          40  ->  43  ->  44
>> WIN.  39 + (4 x 1.6) = 46
>>
> Oh, and while I'm at it, where did the extra youk on my bet disappear to?
> 
> I much prefer:
> WIN.  39 + (5 x 1.6) = 47

Oh that's really weird.  Cos the actual calculation above is wrong
too, it should have been 45.  Ok, 47 it is then.  :-/

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> 
>>>Hands up anyone who is surprised?
> 
> 
> Was that you not putting your hand up?

I was typing the address you've reserved for the webcam into my favourites.

Does Ben know that everyone will be playing naked yet, so that it's 
guaranteed nobody has any cards up their sleeves?

"nigel"  wrote in message 
news:k6CdnRucDq0r0GbXnZ2dnUVZ7vVi4p2d@brightview.co.uk...
> vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
>
>>
>>>>Hands up anyone who is surprised?
>>
>>
>> Was that you not putting your hand up?
>
> I was typing the address you've reserved for the webcam into my 
> favourites.
>
> Does Ben know that everyone will be playing naked yet, so that it's 
> guaranteed nobody has any cards up their sleeves?

There's nothing in the rules to stop Ben putting the table up his arses, 
though.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan

wrote in message 
news:7m03fsF3gf9aiU1@mid.individual.net...
> Although very tempted to give it to CJM for his obvious "taking
> one for the team

I've been 'talking one' in this comp for quite a few weeks now, and quite 
frankly it now hurts when I sit down.

I thought I might at least be in line for an inaugural Reverse Midas Award 
(for serially condemning otherwise-comfortable teams to unexpected defeats) 
or some other consolation.

CJM  wrote:
> I thought I might at least be in line for an inaugural Reverse Midas Award 
> (for serially condemning otherwise-comfortable teams to unexpected defeats) 
> or some other consolation. 

Sorry, but the reverse-midas is currently mine for the season.
At least until my Spectacular Reversal Of Fortune date.  Which I predct
to be some time in June, unfortunately.

wrote in message 
news:7m2bqgF3g9tifU1@mid.individual.net...
> CJM  wrote:
>> I thought I might at least be in line for an inaugural Reverse Midas 
>> Award
>> (for serially condemning otherwise-comfortable teams to unexpected 
>> defeats)
>> or some other consolation.
>
> Sorry, but the reverse-midas is currently mine for the season.
> At least until my Spectacular Reversal Of Fortune date.  Which I predct
> to be some time in June, unfortunately.

Fair point.

I thought I might also qualify from the Barrymore Award (for the most 
spectacular fall from grace), but Kully has that one in the bag.

As with my footballing favourites, although it's early doors, it looks like 
it will be yet another season without any sort of silverware...  :(

*  [2009-11-11 09:27] [uk.sport.football]:
> Although very tempted to give it to CJM for his obvious "taking
> one for the team", I think Sid must get the sexy award of the week.
> And I think we all ought to apologise to Pompey, you know, just on
> principle ...

Yay, my first!


Sid
-- 
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
remove the espam bits to mail

Sid <sid@invalid_nerte.invalid.invalid_net.invalid> wrote:
>> Although very tempted to give it to CJM for his obvious "taking
>> one for the team", I think Sid must get the sexy award of the week.
>> And I think we all ought to apologise to Pompey, you know, just on
>> principle ...
> Yay, my first!

You'll always remember it.  At least until you forget.
Go on, give us a wiggle, you sexy beast!

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> Go on, give us a wiggle, you sexy beast!

The last sexy beast here became the only dog in the zoo, with a torn 
arse as well.