****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****


Does uniqueness or eccentricity always necessitate a trade-off mit 
popularity?!?

Am I really /that/ much of a cunt?

FFS.


8===================================D - - -


This week's match odds-me-do (31/10/09) (15:00 GMT unless otherwise stated):


                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY



Arse v Spurs (12:45 GMT)    1.58    4.45    6
Man u v Blackcockburn (17:30 GMT)    1.17    8.2    26
Evercunts v Vilecunts    2.6    3.4    3
Fulcock v Livercock    4.5    3.5    1.95
Bolton v Chelsea   8.6     4.6    1.44
Pompey v Wigan    2.6    3.4    3.1
Sundercunts v Wham    1.98    3.5    4.2
Stoke v Wolves    1.98    3.5    4.2
Cov v Reading    2.6    3.35    3.5
Preston v Palace    2.1    3.5    4
Notts Co v Shrews    1.75    3.9    5.2




Deadline for teh betcunting:   12:44 GMT, 31/10/09

=~=================================


Last Wheek's Profits/Losses and This Wheek's Balances'n'shit:


lots of small penises

Demo            119 ->  158 ->  159
TMAK            93  ->  91  ->  92
Joe             62  ->  64  ->  65
Aubrey Straw    57  ->  62  ->  63
Mikey           61  ->  59  ->  60
BTN             63  ->  58  ->  59
Os              59  ->  57  ->  58
Roo             57    tiny penis
Chopsy          53    MICROCOCK
Goalie          50  ->  49  ->  50
Kevin           44  ->  42  ->  43
Martin          49  ->  39  ->  40
Sid             40  ->  30  ->  31
CJM             54  ->  29  ->  30
Conlan          13  ->  10  ->  11
Cornelius       19  ->  9   ->  10
kullrad         1    MICROCOCK





--
HTH, HAND, HoHY

"viva las BETCUNTS!!lame1!1!"  - Elvis P. Cuntcock...


http://uksf.org.uk/betcunt/'n'shit

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
news:7krpbuF3bia01U1@mid.individual.net...

> Cov v Reading    2.6    3.35    3.5


BET: Three (3) on lowly Reading please, Henbane Beltane.

BTN

* Sir Benjamin Nunn [2009-10-28 15:54] [uk.sport.football]:

> Bolton v Chelsea   8.6     4.6    1.44

Meh. I am last anyway. 

AMY on the away win, please.

> Sid             40  ->  30  ->  31



Sid
-- 
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
remove the espam bits to mail

In message , Sir Benjamin Nunn 
 writes

>Cov v Reading    2.6    3.35    3.5

BET Y 1 on the HOME win please.

>Goalie          50  ->  49  ->  50

-- 
Goalie of the Century

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:50:55 +0000 (UTC), Sid
<sid@invalid_nerte.invalid.invalid_net.invalid> wrote:

>* Sir Benjamin Nunn [2009-10-28 15:54] [uk.sport.football]:
>
>> Bolton v Chelsea   8.6     4.6    1.44
>
>Meh. I am last anyway. 
>
>AMY on the away win, please.
>
>> Sid             40  ->  30  ->  31
>
Hi Kully!


-- 
Demosthenes
'I can't really recall much beyond that. My time in Youksef seems very transient, 
it's like a dream, or a wonderful land like Narnia. Except with glans everywhere.'

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
news:7krpbuF3bia01U1@mid.individual.net...

> Fulcock v Livercock    4.5    3.5    1.95

BET: 15y on the Away Win

Sid <sid@invalid_nerte.invalid.invalid_net.invalid> wrote:
> Meh. I am last anyway. 

No you're not, not even slightly.  Assuming you mean in this game,
anyhow.  Even if you meant in life, you almost certainly still have Ben
taking you up the rear.  Or, er, something.

Demosthenes  wrote:
>>AMY on the away win, please.
> Hi Kully!

Heh, if this new trend continues, I could win the league having not
placed a single winning bet!  :-D

On 29 Oct 2009 11:39:30 GMT,  wrote:

>Demosthenes  wrote:
>>>AMY on the away win, please.
>> Hi Kully!
>
>Heh, if this new trend continues, I could win the league having not
>placed a single winning bet!  :-D

That is entirely possible, Vickster. I have a gut feeling that the
winning total will be significantly less than in previous SBLs.

*awaits Ben's dissenting dissertation based on probability and game
theory*

-- 
Demosthenes
'I can't really recall much beyond that. My time in Youksef seems very transient, 
it's like a dream, or a wonderful land like Narnia. Except with glans everywhere.'

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
> Demosthenes  wrote:
> 
>>>AMY on the away win, please.
>>
>>Hi Kully!
> 
> 
> Heh, if this new trend continues, I could win the league having not
> placed a single winning bet!  :-D

Despite having placed all losing bets, you're certainly doing better 
than Poleson, who hasn't placed any winning bets.

Losing is the new winning.

Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:
>
 > ****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper****
 >
 > Cov v Reading    2.6    3.35    3.5

5y on Reading

BlueRoo

wrote in news:7ktd5uF3bbbqvU1
@mid.individual.net:

> No you're not, not even slightly.  Assuming you mean in this game,
> anyhow.  Even if you meant in life, you almost certainly still have Ben
> taking you up the rear.  Or, er, something.

Coming up the rear Vicky, it's called coming up the rear.

-- 
Cheers, Os

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in
news:7krpbuF3bia01U1@mid.individual.net: 

> ****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****
> 

Attn Betcunt Master General, Mister M has asked me to betcunt for him as 
he's communing with hillbillies this week. And while they have several 
cousins on offer for him, a Usenet connection has not been forthcoming so 
far.

Not sure if there's anything particular I have to do re the SBL rules, 
apart from fellate a big cock, obviously. So consider this Mr M's 
betcunt.

> 8===================================D - - -
> 
> 
> Arse v Spurs (12:45 GMT)    1.58    4.45    6

BET: 5 youks on the Arse to WIN, followed by 8 bottles of Steinlager Pure 
because I love water fizzy cold lager. Ta, Martin.

-- 
Cheers, Os

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in
news:7krpbuF3bia01U1@mid.individual.net: 

> ****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****

> 
> This week's match odds-me-do (31/10/09) (15:00 GMT unless otherwise
> stated): 
> 

> Stoke v Wolves    1.98    3.5    4.2

BET: 3 Youks on Stoke to WIN please, Francis J. Child.


-- 
Cheers, Os

On Oct 28, 8:54 pm, "Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote:
> ****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****
>
> Does uniqueness or eccentricity always necessitate a trade-off mit
> popularity?!?
>
> Am I really /that/ much of a cunt?
>
> FFS.
>
> 8===================================D - - -
>
> This week's match odds-me-do (31/10/09) (15:00 GMT unless otherwise stated):
>
>                         HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
>
> Arse v Spurs (12:45 GMT)    1.58    4.45    6

4 youks on the draw please.

--
Cornelius

On 28 Oct, 20:54, "Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote:

> Does uniqueness or eccentricity always necessitate a trade-off mit
> popularity?!?
>
> Am I really /that/ much of a cunt?

What cunt scale are we using? The traditional Beaufort Cunty scale of
1 for a mildly annoying cunt and 9 for a 'fuck me, batten down the
hatches and man the buttplugs' type of cunt?

> FFS.

Quilt.

> Preston v Palace    2.1    3.5    4

BET: 8 on Preston NE to remove one or two shades from Simon Jordan's
unfeasibly orange tan (HOME) please Mr Parliamentary Expenses System.

> TMAK            93  ->  91  ->  92

Sir Benjamin Nunn  wrote:
> Arse v Spurs (12:45 GMT)    1.58    4.45    6
> 
> Kevin           44  ->  42  ->  43

BET: 2 on Arse-Spurs draw

Sir Benjamin Nunn  wrote:
> Pompey v Wigan    2.6    3.4    3.1

BET: 2 on the draw

> Conlan          13  ->  10  ->  11

Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:

> Pompey v Wigan    2.6    3.4    3.1

BET: 8 Youks on Pumpey to LOSE.

C

Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:

>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
>
>Pompey v Wigan    2.6    3.4    3.1

BET:  I would like to place 5 Youks on an away win for Wigan, please

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message
news:7krpbuF3bia01U1@mid.individual.net...
> ****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****
>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
> Bolton v Chelsea   8.6     4.6    1.44
> Joe             62  ->  64  ->  65

BET:  10 on teh Chelsea (away) please, Little Miss Muffet.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
news:7krpbuF3bia01U1@mid.individual.net...
> Does uniqueness or eccentricity always necessitate a trade-off mit popularity?!?

Maybe but they're probably not loved and admired to the same
extent.  I'd rather be loved by a few people than liked by a lot.

> Am I really /that/ much of a cunt?

Oh, most definitely.  That's never been in question.

> Stoke v Wolves    1.98    3.5    4.2
> Mikey           61  ->  59  ->  60

BET: 2 youks on a Stoke win, please, Yokozuna.


-- 
Mike

http://theheroicartoflosing.wordpress.com/

"Michael Cunningham"  wrote in message 
news:hcg1tf$li4$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> "Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
> news:7krpbuF3bia01U1@mid.individual.net...
>> Does uniqueness or eccentricity always necessitate a trade-off mit 
>> popularity?!?
>
> Maybe but they're probably not loved and admired to the same
> extent.

AVSWTWP.

> I'd rather be loved by a few people than liked by a lot.

Well your whole Facebook persona's fucking backfired then hasn't it. 
There's a whole army of Mikey-likers out there.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan

"Joe Horowitz" <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote in message 
news:JYMGm.5604$op2.500@newsfe28.ams2...
>> Maybe but they're probably not loved and admired to the same
>> extent.
>
> AVSWTWP.

It's a subject I discussed with a friend quite recently, actually.
She said she expected a big turnout at her funeral as she considered
herself a very popular person.  And she's probably right.  She'll
probably pack the place out.  Partly because of her job and partly
because she's just a very social person.  And yet, almost all of her
relationships in life are almost unbearably superficial and vapid.
So I really don't know that popularity, in that sense, is an especially
enviable quality.

I sometimes see her FB status update threads and there's not a
genuine sentiment to be found anywhere.  It's all, "u r so great!!!...
"we should meet up for coffee soon, mwah"... "great to hear
you're keeping well, gorgeous."  And yet, when I read one of
Ben's, it's very obvious that people are genuinely warm and
sincere towards him.  I think that's infinitely better.

>> I'd rather be loved by a few people than liked by a lot.
>
> Well your whole Facebook persona's fucking backfired then hasn't it. There's a whole army of 
> Mikey-likers out there.

DWTWP.  I've received an "I love you", an "I'm in love with
you" and an "I'm a little bit in love with you" from three of my
FB army to date.  The Mikey-liking can sometimes spill over into
Mikey-loving.


-- 
Mike

http://theheroicartoflosing.wordpress.com/

"Michael Cunningham"  wrote in
news:hcg7hk$tfm$1@news.eternal-september.org: 

> because she's just a very social person.  And yet, almost all of her
> relationships in life are almost unbearably superficial and vapid.
> So I really don't know that popularity, in that sense, is an
> especially enviable quality.
> 
> I sometimes see her FB status update threads and there's not a
> genuine sentiment to be found anywhere.  It's all, "u r so great!!!...
> "we should meet up for coffee soon, mwah"... "great to hear

We should meet up for coffee soon Mikey.

-- 
Cheers, Os

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:54:18 -0000, "Sir Benjamin Nunn"
 wrote:

>****House Off teh Hopeful Youks headed ghey paper-me-do****
>This week's match odds-me-do (31/10/09) (15:00 GMT unless otherwise stated):
>
>                        HOME     DRAW     AWHEYGHEY
>Bolton v Chelsea   8.6     4.6    1.44
>
>Deadline for teh betcunting:   12:44 GMT, 31/10/09
>
>Last Wheek's Profits/Losses and This Wheek's Balances'n'shit:
>Demo            119 ->  158 ->  159

BET: 60 youks on the Chelsea win.


-- 
Demosthenes
'I can't really recall much beyond that. My time in Youksef seems very transient, 
it's like a dream, or a wonderful land like Narnia. Except with glans everywhere.'

"Michael Cunningham"  wrote in message 
news:hcg1tf$li4$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> "Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
> news:7krpbuF3bia01U1@mid.individual.net...
>> Does uniqueness or eccentricity always necessitate a trade-off mit 
>> popularity?!?
>
> Maybe but they're probably not loved and admired to the same
> extent.  I'd rather be loved by a few people than liked by a lot.


But what about people (OK, person) who love me, but don't commit to me 
*because* the validation of others means a lot to her, and most people don't 
like me.

That kind of shit bothers me. Greatly.


>> Am I really /that/ much of a cunt?
>
> Oh, most definitely.  That's never been in question.


AWTWP. But am I really that much of a /cunt/?



>> Stoke v Wolves    1.98    3.5    4.2
>> Mikey           61  ->  59  ->  60
>
> BET: 2 youks on a Stoke win, please, Yokozuna.


His real name was Rodney. He died in Liverpool. Fat cunt.

BTN

"Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
news:7l3e9hF3c6ftpU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Maybe but they're probably not loved and admired to the same
>> extent.  I'd rather be loved by a few people than liked by a lot.
>  But what about people (OK, person) who love me, but don't commit to me *because* the validation 
> of others means a lot to her, and most people don't like me.
>
> That kind of shit bothers me. Greatly.

But doesn't that tell you everything you need to know?

I once had a very lovely, very life-affirming relationship
ended when my girlfriend was persuaded by her flatmate
that she was better suited in the long-term to her ex-boyfriend.

Naturally, this made me very sad at the time but what kind of
silly cow lets other people make their decisions when it comes
to relationships?  I think her choice to follow the advice of her
(possibly self-serving) flatmate said an awful lot about her
character.  None of it good.

If someone chooses the validation of others over you, you
probably shouldn't choose them over everyone else.

>> BET: 2 youks on a Stoke win, please, Yokozuna.
>  His real name was Rodney. He died in Liverpool. Fat cunt.

He had the shortest ever WWF title reign.


-- 
Mike

http://theheroicartoflosing.wordpress.com/

* Michael Cunningham [2009-10-30 19:55] [uk.sport.football]:

> Maybe but they're probably not loved and admired to the same
> extent.  I'd rather be loved by a few people than liked by a lot.

It's okay that none of you wished me a Happy Birthday but, dissing my
facebook feed is just mean.

Sid
-- 
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
remove the espam bits to mail

"Sid" <sid@invalid_nerte.invalid.invalid_net.invalid> wrote in message 
news:slrnhepl4v.cm.sid@Cameron.local...
> It's okay that none of you wished me a Happy Birthday

It's not okay, Sid.  I'm sorry.  Truly.  I hope you had a
nice birthday.  What age are you?  I dislike that it doesn't
tell me that on your FB page.

> but, dissing my facebook feed is just mean.

I also dislike that it doesn't tell just how many FB friends
you have.  I'd hazard a guess at at least 600.

Popular cunt.


-- 
Mike

http://theheroicartoflosing.wordpress.com/

* Michael Cunningham [2009-10-31 20:24] [uk.sport.football]:
> "Sid" <sid@invalid_nerte.invalid.invalid_net.invalid> wrote in message 

>> It's okay that none of you wished me a Happy Birthday

> It's not okay, Sid.  I'm sorry.  Truly.  I hope you had a
> nice birthday.  What age are you?  I dislike that it doesn't
> tell me that on your FB page.

I am a 1980 so I am 29. I also just realised that I have been on 
USENET over a decade.

>> but, dissing my facebook feed is just mean.

> I also dislike that it doesn't tell just how many FB friends
> you have.  I'd hazard a guess at at least 600.

It doesn't? That's weird. I was at grad school these past two years
and a lot of my FB friends are from school. 

> Popular cunt.

Me? Pfft. You are the one with the books and whatnot. That's my 
'stuff you learn on facebook' for today. Except, I don't know if today
is Saturday or Sunday as it is now 1am.

Sid
-- 
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
remove the espam bits to mail

* Sid [2009-11-01 01:03] [uk.sport.football]:
> * Michael Cunningham [2009-10-31 20:24] [uk.sport.football]:

>>> It's okay that none of you wished me a Happy Birthday

>> It's not okay, Sid.  I'm sorry.  Truly.  I hope you had a
>> nice birthday.  

I did, thank you! 

Sid
-- 
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
remove the espam bits to mail

Sid <sid@invalid_nerte.invalid.invalid_net.invalid> wrote in 
news:slrnheq963.1pv.sid@Cameron.local:

>>> It's okay that none of you wished me a Happy Birthday
> 
>> It's not okay, Sid.  I'm sorry.  Truly.  I hope you had a
>> nice birthday.  What age are you?  I dislike that it doesn't
>> tell me that on your FB page.
> 
> I am a 1980 so I am 29. I also just realised that I have been on 
> USENET over a decade.

Happy birthday Sid. Do you realise that the day you were born, West Ham 
were nearly finished celebrating their FA Cup win? True story.

-- 
Cheers, Os

vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:

> Sir Benjamin Nunn  wrote:
> 
>>Pompey v Wigan    2.6    3.4    3.1
> 
> 
> BET: 2 on the draw

Excellent work, Vicky. This is the stuff of legends.

"nigel"  wrote in message 
news:NeadnX-RMIHJDXDXnZ2dnUVZ8mxi4p2d@brightview.co.uk...
> vicky@dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
>
>>>Pompey v Wigan    2.6    3.4    3.1
>>
>>
>> BET: 2 on the draw
>
> Excellent work, Vicky. This is the stuff of legends.


It's incredibly impressive.  Well, not the whole 'bankroll management' 
thing, obviously.  That's just shit.  But this incredible run of bad 
betcunts has, in my opinion, taken on the proportions of something very 
powerful and erotic indeed.  Not to mention powerful.  In many ways, I think 
it's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen in the SBL, and if Vicky were 
somehow able to keep this up for the entire season I think we should declare 
her the winner.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan

On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:10:09 -0000, "Joe Horowitz"
<my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote:

> In many ways, I think 
>it's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen in the SBL, and if Vicky were 
>somehow able to keep this up for the entire season I think we should declare 
>her the winner.

Offended.

So is Mikey.


-- 
Demosthenes
'I can't really recall much beyond that. My time in Youksef seems very transient, 
it's like a dream, or a wonderful land like Narnia. Except with glans everywhere.'

Osbourne Ruddock wrote:
> 
> Attn Betcunt Master General, Mister M has asked me to betcunt for him as 
> he's communing with hillbillies this week. And while they have several 
> cousins on offer for him, a Usenet connection has not been forthcoming so 
> far.
> 
The cousins were pretty crap, but the cows were very accommodating. Mooo!

> 
> BET: 5 youks on the Arse to WIN, followed by 8 bottles of Steinlager Pure 
> because I love water fizzy cold lager. Ta, Martin.
> 
That's uncannily similar to what I would have posted had I been able to.

Thanks Os *smooch*

M

-- 
Martin:  Poster, large, helpful, SBL administrator.  Award-winning 
homebrewer and spreadshit maestro.  Last remaining Huddersfield fan on 
the planet.

nigel  wrote:
>>>Pompey v Wigan    2.6    3.4    3.1
>> 
>> BET: 2 on the draw
> 
> Excellent work, Vicky. This is the stuff of legends.

I like to think I'm single-handedly turning Pompey's season around.

Joe Horowitz <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote:
> and if Vicky were 
> somehow able to keep this up for the entire season I think we should declare 
> her the winner.

Oh well /now/ you're going to have spoilt it!

wrote in message 
news:7l6mh0F3bjajdU2@mid.individual.net...
> Joe Horowitz <my_name@youblunder.co.youghey> wrote:
>> and if Vicky were
>> somehow able to keep this up for the entire season I think we should 
>> declare
>> her the winner.
>
> Oh well /now/ you're going to have spoilt it!

In my own special way, Vicky, I like to think I spoil everything.


-- 
Joe

"I am the fat puddin', but a single puddingness" - Vicky Conlan

"Michael Cunningham"  wrote in message 
news:hci8gk$498$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> "Sir Benjamin Nunn"  wrote in message 
> news:7l3e9hF3c6ftpU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Maybe but they're probably not loved and admired to the same
>>> extent.  I'd rather be loved by a few people than liked by a lot.
>>  But what about people (OK, person) who love me, but don't commit to me 
>> *because* the validation of others means a lot to her, and most people 
>> don't like me.
>>
>> That kind of shit bothers me. Greatly.
>
> But doesn't that tell you everything you need to know?


The opposite, in fact.

It tells me that the rules keep changing, and I don't know what I need to 
know next.


Imagine you're a specialist potato farmer, and your boss asks to grow a 
special potato that weighs exactly 13.3 ounces which is uniformly russet in 
colour with no blotches.

So, you keep at your task, and it's really hard, and you find you've grown 
some potatoes that are the right weight, and some that are the right colour, 
and some that are 13.2 ounces and off-russet, and which feel so damn close 
but not quite right.

And then, one day, you finally get there. You produce a perfectly consistent 
13.3 ounce russet-coloured potato, and show it proudly to your boss.

And he says 'Oh yeah, also, it has to be in the shape of the face of 
Christ'.


> I once had a very lovely, very life-affirming relationship
> ended when my girlfriend was persuaded by her flatmate
> that she was better suited in the long-term to her ex-boyfriend.


Cunts.


> Naturally, this made me very sad at the time but what kind of
> silly cow lets other people make their decisions when it comes
> to relationships?  I think her choice to follow the advice of her
> (possibly self-serving) flatmate said an awful lot about her
> character.  None of it good.


AWTWP.


> If someone chooses the validation of others over you, you
> probably shouldn't choose them over everyone else.


What if they constantly hint that maybe they will actually choose you over 
the evil, prejudiced, hateful, hellbound people though?

That's actually a very good feeling. To feel that things might work out 
properly for the best, and somebody might make the right decision, despite 
intense pressure from the dark side.

Anyway, that's what my life's been for the last year.

Taught me a lot, so it has.



>>> BET: 2 youks on a Stoke win, please, Yokozuna.
>>  His real name was Rodney. He died in Liverpool. Fat cunt.
>
> He had the shortest ever WWF title reign.


Yeah I remember the feeling of extreme disappointment I had watching that 
predictable scenario unfold...

BTN

Chopsy wrote:
> Sir Benjamin Nunn wrote:
> 
>> Pompey v Wigan    2.6    3.4    3.1
> 
> BET: 8 Youks on Pumpey to LOSE.

I thought that went really fucking well.

Pack of twats.

C