End of the world as we know it part2
As the worlds global warming problems bite deeper into the worlds habitable
land, how should we react, baring in mind diminishing resources, and the
inevitable die off of the human and animal populations.
Aid will be a flea on a elephant,non existent, unsustainable.
Countries near the equator should see the major problems first, it is
already happening now, we will notice that, things will be in flux deserts
further north may have a weather change while other areas will become
deserts.
France 's grape growing will diminish and finish within six years.
We are already seeing a massive rise in migration, Africa is undergoing
water shortages, wildlife is dying.
What do countries do with such high numbers of migrants, can we afford to be
human and let them all in, and place the whole population at risk,
starvation lack of water will bring on diseases.
This earth will maintain maybe a quarter of the present population, probably
far less, is it time we considered options.
Do we say hard luck to those who are in lands that are overtaken by global
warming, or do we allow in the young only, bare in mind kindness will
probably endanger you and your family.
Plus even if your in an area that is not desert the whole weather pattern
would have changed, flooding or drought, the weather going beserk.
Do the relatively well off countries offer them suicide pills, or use war
as a population normaliser.
Afterall one nuclear bomb does a lot of killing.
Is this the Armaghedon the religious have been awaiting .
date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:23:43 -0000
author: danny
|