Seeing those clowns in the HoC today all sitting there with their
token little poppies. All righteous and all powerful - all knowing and
all so arrogant.  Yes folks - these are the very same political class
that has brought us so much treachery,  cultural disaster and economic
failure. 

How on earth any sain person in Britain can vote Lib/Lab or Con passes
human understanding

On Nov 4, 1:39 pm, jake  wrote:
> Seeing those clowns in the HoC today all sitting there with their
> token little poppies. All righteous and all powerful - all knowing and
> all so arrogant.  Yes folks - these are the very same political class
> that has brought us so much treachery,  cultural disaster and economic
> failure.
>
> How on earth any sain person in Britain can vote Lib/Lab or Con passes
> human understanding

I don't know why you need the apostrophe Jake old lad and I think you
mean s_a_n_e and rather than "passes" I think you mean "is beyond"

Weren't you on here the other day as a graduate of the 70's bemoaning
the quality of today's graduates?

Don't you dare! They'd eat you alive.

BTW your party picks up around 2% to 3% of the eligible vote. Most
folks don't find any mystery in that.

"Mel Rowing"  wrote in message 
news:bcd6ee2d-781a-4b04-9fdc-ba7606a4b764@a31g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

> I don't know why you need the apostrophe Jake old lad and I think you
> mean s_a_n_e and rather than "passes" I think you mean "is beyond"

"the peace of God, which passeth all understanding" (Phil 4:7)

Damn heathen.

"Mel Rowing"  wrote in message 
news:bcd6ee2d-781a-4b04-9fdc-ba7606a4b764@a31g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 4, 1:39 pm, jake  wrote:
> Seeing those clowns in the HoC today all sitting there with their
> token little poppies. All righteous and all powerful - all knowing and
> all so arrogant. Yes folks - these are the very same political class
> that has brought us so much treachery, cultural disaster and economic
> failure.
>
> How on earth any sain person in Britain can vote Lib/Lab or Con passes
> human understanding


I don't know why you need the apostrophe Jake old lad and I think you
mean s_a_n_e and rather than "passes" I think you mean "is beyond"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priceless! Several commas, and a full stop, missing from one appallingly 
constructed sentence - and you think that you have the right to lecture 
others about written English!

If indeed you ever were a teacher (highly unlikely), and you are typical 
example of that profession, then we need to look no further to find the 
reasons for the declining educational standards of todays school leavers.




Weren't you on here the other day as a graduate of the 70's bemoaning
the quality of today's graduates?

Don't you dare! They'd eat you alive.
-------------------------------------------
Not if they've been taught by you they wouldn't!

BTW, "70's" should be 70s - or even '70s.

So it seems that - like your partner-in-crime, Blackie - you're not just a 
piece of evil subversive scum, but thick as well.

Farmer Giles wrote:

> So it seems that - like your partner-in-crime, Blackie - you're not just a 
> piece of evil subversive scum, but thick as well.

Goodness,  I seem to have upset you.

Probably not as much as David Cameron did this afternoon,  but never mind...

-- 
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of 
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat 
single handed with a quarterstaff.