Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:38:11 -0800 (PST),    group: uk.politics.misc        back       
OT:   
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp91UH5v9cY
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:38:11 -0800 (PST)   author:   Ariadne

Re: OT:   
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:38:11 -0800 (PST), Ariadne
 wrote:

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp91UH5v9cY

It started off ok - then got more insincere until it dissolved into
farce and soap bubbles at the end.
I think it better be ask for a Nob rather than  Nobel.

Having said that, I'd prefer to vote for Rod K. for president of
Europe that the prospective piece of shi* we current are looking at.
But then again - we don't even have a vote do we!
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:01:35 +0000   author:   jake

Re: OT:   
jake wrote:
> Ariadne wrote:
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp91UH5v9cY
>
> It started off ok - then got more insincere until it dissolved into
> farce and soap bubbles at the end.
> I think it better be ask for a Nob rather than  Nobel.
>
> Having said that, I'd prefer to vote for Rod K. for president of
> Europe that the prospective piece of shi* we current are looking at.
> But then again - we don't even have a vote do we!

I heard that explained.  Apparently a president who
was elected would be on a level with the US
president and that would never do.

I hope that "Not until we have EUSSR armed forces"
isn't the next stage.
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:46:25 -0800 (PST)   author:   Ariadne

Re: OT:   
Ariadne wrote:
> jake wrote:
>> Ariadne wrote:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp91UH5v9cY
>> It started off ok - then got more insincere until it dissolved into
>> farce and soap bubbles at the end.
>> I think it better be ask for a Nob rather than  Nobel.
>>
>> Having said that, I'd prefer to vote for Rod K. for president of
>> Europe that the prospective piece of shi* we current are looking at.
>> But then again - we don't even have a vote do we!
> 
> I heard that explained.  Apparently a president who
> was elected would be on a level with the US
> president and that would never do.
> 
> I hope that "Not until we have EUSSR armed forces"
> isn't the next stage.

Why?

At the moment our armed forces are getting shredded to no very good 
purpose in Afghanistan,  are badly equipped and look like not getting 
the next generation of large and expensive systems they need.

How could it possibly get any worse?


-- 
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of 
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat 
single handed with a quarterstaff.
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:32:38 +0000   author:   William Black

Re: OT:   
Ariadne wrote:
> jake wrote:
>> Ariadne wrote:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp91UH5v9cY
>>
>> It started off ok - then got more insincere until it dissolved into
>> farce and soap bubbles at the end.
>> I think it better be ask for a Nob rather than Nobel.
>>
>> Having said that, I'd prefer to vote for Rod K. for president of
>> Europe that the prospective piece of shi* we current are looking at.
>> But then again - we don't even have a vote do we!
>
> I heard that explained.  Apparently a president who
> was elected would be on a level with the US
> president and that would never do.
>
> I hope that "Not until we have EUSSR armed forces"
> isn't the next stage.

And what fundamental difference do you see between that and NATO? Both 
are/would be multinational forces
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:24:58 +0100   author:   Lou Ravi

Re: OT:   
Lou Ravi wrote:
> Ariadne wrote:
>> jake wrote:
>>> Ariadne wrote:
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp91UH5v9cY
>>> It started off ok - then got more insincere until it dissolved into
>>> farce and soap bubbles at the end.
>>> I think it better be ask for a Nob rather than Nobel.
>>>
>>> Having said that, I'd prefer to vote for Rod K. for president of
>>> Europe that the prospective piece of shi* we current are looking at.
>>> But then again - we don't even have a vote do we!
>> I heard that explained.  Apparently a president who
>> was elected would be on a level with the US
>> president and that would never do.
>>
>> I hope that "Not until we have EUSSR armed forces"
>> isn't the next stage.
> 
> And what fundamental difference do you see between that and NATO? Both 
> are/would be multinational forces 
> 

The major difference would be losing the American at the top of the 
military command structure.

Nope,  no down-side so far...

-- 
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of 
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat 
single handed with a quarterstaff.
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:37:07 +0000   author:   William Black

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us