they certainly would not say that about the jews...

imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over 
'emselves to prosecute...

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:

> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
> 
> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
> 'emselves to prosecute...
> 
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/

I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want off 
the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)

On Nov 2, 5:18 pm, FrereTuck  wrote:
> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>
> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
> 'emselves to prosecute...
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/

Talk about PC running riot!  You'd think they'd have something better
to do really wouldn't you?

UD

"FrereTuck"  wrote in message 
news:pan.2009.11.02.17.18.51@invalid.com...
> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>
> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
> 'emselves to prosecute...
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/


Thanks for posting - fucking hilarious!!

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:31:40 -0800, Uncle Dave wrote:

> On Nov 2, 5:18 pm, FrereTuck  wrote:
>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>
>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
> 
> Talk about PC running riot!  You'd think they'd have something better to
> do really wouldn't you?
> 
> UD

Ach... the Jocks always get it in the sporran over their "alleged" 
parsimony... ;)

anyway... whats so bad about wanting a good price? as long as the trade 
is fair... i.e. not seconds sold as prime, and not blackmail (emotional 
or otherwise) over the price etc.

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:41:04 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:31:40 -0800, Uncle Dave wrote:
> 
>> On Nov 2, 5:18 pm, FrereTuck  wrote:
>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>
>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>> 
>> Talk about PC running riot!  You'd think they'd have something better
>> to do really wouldn't you?
>> 
>> UD
> 
> Ach... the Jocks always get it in the sporran over their "alleged"
> parsimony... ;)
> 
> anyway... whats so bad about wanting a good price? as long as the trade
> is fair... i.e. not seconds sold as prime, and not blackmail (emotional
> or otherwise) over the price etc.

though they proved themselves thorough bilderbergers over the scottish 
parliament procurement ;)

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:00:06 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:41:04 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:31:40 -0800, Uncle Dave wrote:
>> 
>>> On Nov 2, 5:18 pm, FrereTuck  wrote:
>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>
>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>> 
>>> Talk about PC running riot!  You'd think they'd have something better
>>> to do really wouldn't you?
>>> 
>>> UD
>> 
>> Ach... the Jocks always get it in the sporran over their "alleged"
>> parsimony... ;)
>> 
>> anyway... whats so bad about wanting a good price? as long as the trade
>> is fair... i.e. not seconds sold as prime, and not blackmail (emotional
>> or otherwise) over the price etc.
> 
> though they proved themselves thorough bilderbergers over the scottish
> parliament procurement ;)

ah... but of course... the "british" were paying ;)

"FrereTuck"  wrote in message 
news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>
>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>
>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>
> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want off
> the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)

Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little "state" 
of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being *tightwadded* 
psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on the dog turd !

********************
http://www.nowarforisrael.com

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:

> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>
>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>
>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>
>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want off
>> the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
> 
> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being *tightwadded*
> psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on the dog turd !
> 
> ********************
> http://www.nowarforisrael.com

my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank funding 
and Isreal might work... (they would have to negotiate with their 
neighbours rather than think they can just drop DU, DIME, Barometrics and 
Flechettes on them...)

"FrereTuck"  wrote in message 
news:pan.2009.11.02.19.13.03@invalid.com...
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>
>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>
>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>
>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>
>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want off
>>> the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>
>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being *tightwadded*
>> psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on the dog turd !
>>
>> ********************
>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>
> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank funding
> and Isreal might work... (they would have to negotiate with their
> neighbours rather than think they can just drop DU, DIME, Barometrics and
> Flechettes on them...

True.    ;-)   that *would* be a highly desirable situation !

FrereTuck wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
> 
>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>
>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>
>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want off
>>> the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being *tightwadded*
>> psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on the dog turd !
>>
>> ********************
>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
> 
> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank funding 
> and Isreal might work... (they would have to negotiate with their 
> neighbours rather than think they can just drop DU, DIME, Barometrics and 
> Flechettes on them...)

It didn't work in 1967 when all they had was a load of British and 
French surplus stuff.

Why should it work now?

Have the Arabs got any better at fighting?

-- 
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of 
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat 
single handed with a quarterstaff.

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:31:52 +0000, William Black wrote:

> FrereTuck wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>> 
>>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>>
>>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want
>>>> off the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being
>>> *tightwadded* psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on
>>> the dog turd !
>>>
>>> ********************
>>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>> 
>> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank funding
>> and Isreal might work... (they would have to negotiate with their
>> neighbours rather than think they can just drop DU, DIME, Barometrics
>> and Flechettes on them...)
> 
> It didn't work in 1967 when all they had was a load of British and
> French surplus stuff.
> 
> Why should it work now?
> 
> Have the Arabs got any better at fighting?

did you not notice the result of the last israeli incursion into Lebanon?

that is, with their F16's whatever, they can successfully fry and bury 
alive innocent civilians no problem....

when they have to fight determined and reasonably well armed Lebanese?

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:43:25 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:31:52 +0000, William Black wrote:
> 
>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>>> 
>>>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want
>>>>> off the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>>>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being
>>>> *tightwadded* psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on
>>>> the dog turd !
>>>>
>>>> ********************
>>>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>>> 
>>> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank
>>> funding and Isreal might work... (they would have to negotiate with
>>> their neighbours rather than think they can just drop DU, DIME,
>>> Barometrics and Flechettes on them...)
>> 
>> It didn't work in 1967 when all they had was a load of British and
>> French surplus stuff.
>> 
>> Why should it work now?
>> 
>> Have the Arabs got any better at fighting?
> 
> did you not notice the result of the last israeli incursion into
> Lebanon?
> 
> that is, with their F16's whatever, they can successfully fry and bury
> alive innocent civilians no problem....
> 
> when they have to fight determined and reasonably well armed Lebanese?

and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be 
running back to fucking latvia...

"FrereTuck"  wrote in message 
news:pan.2009.11.02.19.47.32@invalid.com...
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:43:25 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:31:52 +0000, William Black wrote:
>>
>>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want
>>>>>> off the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>>>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>>>>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being
>>>>> *tightwadded* psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on
>>>>> the dog turd !
>>>>>
>>>>> ********************
>>>>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>>>>
>>>> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank
>>>> funding and Isreal might work... (they would have to negotiate with
>>>> their neighbours rather than think they can just drop DU, DIME,
>>>> Barometrics and Flechettes on them...)
>>>
>>> It didn't work in 1967 when all they had was a load of British and
>>> French surplus stuff.
>>>
>>> Why should it work now?
>>>
>>> Have the Arabs got any better at fighting?
>>
>> did you not notice the result of the last israeli incursion into
>> Lebanon?
>>
>> that is, with their F16's whatever, they can successfully fry and bury
>> alive innocent civilians no problem....
>>
>> when they have to fight determined and reasonably well armed Lebanese?
>
> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be
> running back to fucking latvia...

Or better still, west into the sea.   :-)

"FrereTuck"  wrote in message 
news:pan.2009.11.02.19.13.03@invalid.com...
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>
>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>
>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>
>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>
>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want off
>>> the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>
>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being *tightwadded*
>> psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on the dog turd !
>>
>> ********************
>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>
> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank funding
> and Isreal might work...

Did you see that fucking demonstration they held earlier this year? Just 
because Obama was *thinking* about cutting their benefits, they were out on 
the streets demonstrating against the US.

Apparently Ariadne wishes she'd been there;

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.politics.misc/browse_frm/thread/63b357b460b44af3/f6764c7b4b3b4159?hl=en&q=israel+wish+there++group:uk.politics.misc+author:Ariadne

Caution: Do not click the link she's pasted - my McAfee went nuts blocking 
trojans and alerting me to attempted registry changes.

"True Blue"  wrote in message 
news:4cSdnc5byLYwpXLXnZ2dnUVZ8tWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message 
> news:pan.2009.11.02.19.13.03@invalid.com...
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>>
>>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>>
>>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>>
>>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want off
>>>> the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>>
>>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being *tightwadded*
>>> psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on the dog turd !
>>>
>>> ********************
>>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>>
>> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank funding
>> and Isreal might work...
>
> Did you see that fucking demonstration they held earlier this year? Just 
> because Obama was *thinking* about cutting their benefits, they were out 
> on the streets demonstrating against the US.
>
> Apparently Ariadne wishes she'd been there;
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.politics.misc/browse_frm/thread/63b357b460b44af3/f6764c7b4b3b4159?hl=en&q=israel+wish+there++group:uk.politics.misc+author:Ariadne
>
> Caution: Do not click the link she's pasted - my McAfee went nuts blocking 
> trojans and alerting me to attempted registry changes.

It was probably trying to get your PC to join GIYUS  ;-)

"Chris X"  wrote in message 
news:sMudnXt6J4jBpHLXnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "True Blue"  wrote in message 
> news:4cSdnc5byLYwpXLXnZ2dnUVZ8tWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message 
>> news:pan.2009.11.02.19.13.03@invalid.com...
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>>>
>>>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want 
>>>>> off
>>>>> the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>>>
>>>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>>>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being 
>>>> *tightwadded*
>>>> psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on the dog turd !
>>>>
>>>> ********************
>>>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>>>
>>> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank funding
>>> and Isreal might work...
>>
>> Did you see that fucking demonstration they held earlier this year? Just 
>> because Obama was *thinking* about cutting their benefits, they were out 
>> on the streets demonstrating against the US.
>>
>> Apparently Ariadne wishes she'd been there;
>>
>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.politics.misc/browse_frm/thread/63b357b460b44af3/f6764c7b4b3b4159?hl=en&q=israel+wish+there++group:uk.politics.misc+author:Ariadne
>>
>> Caution: Do not click the link she's pasted - my McAfee went nuts 
>> blocking trojans and alerting me to attempted registry changes.
>
> It was probably trying to get your PC to join GIYUS  ;-)


I think it has. It won't stop playing "Oh Mein Papa" and McAfee has stopped 
working until I've renewed for 24 months and they wants payment in shekels.

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:47:38 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:43:25 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:31:52 +0000, William Black wrote:
>> 
>>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want
>>>>>> off the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>>>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>>>>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being
>>>>> *tightwadded* psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on
>>>>> the dog turd !
>>>>>
>>>>> ********************
>>>>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>>>> 
>>>> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank
>>>> funding and Isreal might work... (they would have to negotiate with
>>>> their neighbours rather than think they can just drop DU, DIME,
>>>> Barometrics and Flechettes on them...)
>>> 
>>> It didn't work in 1967 when all they had was a load of British and
>>> French surplus stuff.
>>> 
>>> Why should it work now?
>>> 
>>> Have the Arabs got any better at fighting?
>> 
>> did you not notice the result of the last israeli incursion into
>> Lebanon?
>> 
>> that is, with their F16's whatever, they can successfully fry and bury
>> alive innocent civilians no problem....
>> 
>> when they have to fight determined and reasonably well armed Lebanese?
> 
> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be
> running back to fucking latvia...

and i DONT MEAN THAT AS SOME KIND OF CHALLENGE TO THE LATVIANS, i MEAN 
ISRALEIS, THAT THEY HAVE TO PROVE BY OVERWHELMING ARMS TABLES THEY ARE 
THE TOUGHEST, BECAUSE UNLESS THEY ARE PREPARED TO GO ONE ON ONE WITH THE 
LEBANESE USING STAFF, CUDGEL OR FIRST THAT IT IS ANY KIND OF A 'FAIR' 
FIGHT....

FrereTuck wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:31:52 +0000, William Black wrote:
> 
>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:57:33 +0000, Chris X wrote:
>>>
>>>> "FrereTuck"  wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2009.11.02.17.22.50@invalid.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
>>>>>> 'emselves to prosecute...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/
>>>>> I mean I wont say anything about the two frigates the israelis want
>>>>> off the jerries for nowt... ooooops... ;)
>>>> Quite.  It's bad enough that "Israel" is a festering, shitty little
>>>> "state" of psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers... being
>>>> *tightwadded* psychopaths, loan sharks and murderers is the icing on
>>>> the dog turd !
>>>>
>>>> ********************
>>>> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
>>> my theory, and I'm sure its 100% correct, is cut off their yank funding
>>> and Isreal might work... (they would have to negotiate with their
>>> neighbours rather than think they can just drop DU, DIME, Barometrics
>>> and Flechettes on them...)
>> It didn't work in 1967 when all they had was a load of British and
>> French surplus stuff.
>>
>> Why should it work now?
>>
>> Have the Arabs got any better at fighting?
> 
> did you not notice the result of the last israeli incursion into Lebanon?
> 
> that is, with their F16's whatever, they can successfully fry and bury 
> alive innocent civilians no problem....
> 
> when they have to fight determined and reasonably well armed Lebanese?

Are you saying they'd be defeated?

-- 
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of 
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat 
single handed with a quarterstaff.

FrereTuck wrote:

> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be 
> running back to fucking latvia...

That hasn't been the case so far.

So far the only times the Arabs win is when they're hiding behind 
civilians and shooting people in the back.

So far there's no evidence that they could organise anything bigger than 
a murder squad.

Iraq was the most highly organised and well equipped Arab army ever.

How long did they last against a couple of armoured corps?

Remembering that one of them was half British and so equipped with 
antiques that didn't work properly...

March 22nd to April 3rd,  when Baghdad Airport fell wasn't it?

Interesting that the Israeli force structure almost parallels the force 
structure used to invade Iraq.

Perhaps they were doing a bit of force management evaluation for them...

After all,  there were a lot of comments about the small size of the 
force used...

<see,  I can do loony tune conspiracy stuff as well>

-- 
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of 
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat 
single handed with a quarterstaff.

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:39:26 +0000, William Black wrote:

> FrereTuck wrote:
> 
>> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be
>> running back to fucking latvia...
> 
> That hasn't been the case so far.
> 
> So far the only times the Arabs win is when they're hiding behind
> civilians and shooting people in the back.
> 
> So far there's no evidence that they could organise anything bigger than
> a murder squad.
> 
> Iraq was the most highly organised and well equipped Arab army ever.
> 
> How long did they last against a couple of armoured corps?
> 
> Remembering that one of them was half British and so equipped with
> antiques that didn't work properly...
> 
> March 22nd to April 3rd,  when Baghdad Airport fell wasn't it?
> 
> Interesting that the Israeli force structure almost parallels the force
> structure used to invade Iraq.
> 
> Perhaps they were doing a bit of force management evaluation for them...
> 
> After all,  there were a lot of comments about the small size of the
> force used...
> 
> <see,  I can do loony tune conspiracy stuff as well>

really, which De Montfort was it again that said "kill them all god will 
know his own" and you saying "yeah but its a good catchphrase isn't it" 
or something?

you I would love to have in the cross-hairs...

FrereTuck wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:39:26 +0000, William Black wrote:
> 
>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>
>>> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be
>>> running back to fucking latvia...
>> That hasn't been the case so far.
>>
>> So far the only times the Arabs win is when they're hiding behind
>> civilians and shooting people in the back.
>>
>> So far there's no evidence that they could organise anything bigger than
>> a murder squad.
>>
>> Iraq was the most highly organised and well equipped Arab army ever.
>>
>> How long did they last against a couple of armoured corps?
>>
>> Remembering that one of them was half British and so equipped with
>> antiques that didn't work properly...
>>
>> March 22nd to April 3rd,  when Baghdad Airport fell wasn't it?
>>
>> Interesting that the Israeli force structure almost parallels the force
>> structure used to invade Iraq.
>>
>> Perhaps they were doing a bit of force management evaluation for them...
>>
>> After all,  there were a lot of comments about the small size of the
>> force used...
>>
>> <see,  I can do loony tune conspiracy stuff as well>
> 
> really, which De Montfort was it again that said "kill them all god will 
> know his own" and you saying "yeah but its a good catchphrase isn't it" 
> or something?
> 
> you I would love to have in the cross-hairs...
> 

You'd miss son.

I was shooting 1,000 yard targets at the Stickledown when you were still 
shitting yellow.


-- 
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of 
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat 
single handed with a quarterstaff.

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:11:17 +0000, William Black wrote:

> FrereTuck wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:39:26 +0000, William Black wrote:
>> 
>>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>>
>>>> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be
>>>> running back to fucking latvia...
>>> That hasn't been the case so far.
>>>
>>> So far the only times the Arabs win is when they're hiding behind
>>> civilians and shooting people in the back.
>>>
>>> So far there's no evidence that they could organise anything bigger
>>> than a murder squad.
>>>
>>> Iraq was the most highly organised and well equipped Arab army ever.
>>>
>>> How long did they last against a couple of armoured corps?
>>>
>>> Remembering that one of them was half British and so equipped with
>>> antiques that didn't work properly...
>>>
>>> March 22nd to April 3rd,  when Baghdad Airport fell wasn't it?
>>>
>>> Interesting that the Israeli force structure almost parallels the
>>> force structure used to invade Iraq.
>>>
>>> Perhaps they were doing a bit of force management evaluation for
>>> them...
>>>
>>> After all,  there were a lot of comments about the small size of the
>>> force used...
>>>
>>> <see,  I can do loony tune conspiracy stuff as well>
>> 
>> really, which De Montfort was it again that said "kill them all god
>> will know his own" and you saying "yeah but its a good catchphrase
>> isn't it" or something?
>> 
>> you I would love to have in the cross-hairs...
>> 
>> 
> You'd miss son.
> 
> I was shooting 1,000 yard targets at the Stickledown when you were still
> shitting yellow.

so yer a bit alzheimery by now then eh ;)

"William Black"  wrote in message 
news:hcnlef$uj1$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> FrereTuck wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:39:26 +0000, William Black wrote:
>>
>>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>>
>>>> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be
>>>> running back to fucking latvia...
>>> That hasn't been the case so far.
>>>
>>> So far the only times the Arabs win is when they're hiding behind
>>> civilians and shooting people in the back.
>>>
>>> So far there's no evidence that they could organise anything bigger than
>>> a murder squad.
>>>
>>> Iraq was the most highly organised and well equipped Arab army ever.
>>>
>>> How long did they last against a couple of armoured corps?
>>>
>>> Remembering that one of them was half British and so equipped with
>>> antiques that didn't work properly...
>>>
>>> March 22nd to April 3rd,  when Baghdad Airport fell wasn't it?
>>>
>>> Interesting that the Israeli force structure almost parallels the force
>>> structure used to invade Iraq.
>>>
>>> Perhaps they were doing a bit of force management evaluation for them...
>>>
>>> After all,  there were a lot of comments about the small size of the
>>> force used...
>>>
>>> <see,  I can do loony tune conspiracy stuff as well>
>>
>> really, which De Montfort was it again that said "kill them all god will 
>> know his own" and you saying "yeah but its a good catchphrase isn't it" 
>> or something?
>>
>> you I would love to have in the cross-hairs...
>>
>
> You'd miss son.
>
> I was shooting 1,000 yard targets at the Stickledown when you were still 
> shitting yellow.

Hmmm...please elaborate. What weapon were you using?

True Blue wrote:
> 
> "William Black"  wrote in message 
> news:hcnlef$uj1$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:39:26 +0000, William Black wrote:
>>>
>>>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be
>>>>> running back to fucking latvia...
>>>> That hasn't been the case so far.
>>>>
>>>> So far the only times the Arabs win is when they're hiding behind
>>>> civilians and shooting people in the back.
>>>>
>>>> So far there's no evidence that they could organise anything bigger 
>>>> than
>>>> a murder squad.
>>>>
>>>> Iraq was the most highly organised and well equipped Arab army ever.
>>>>
>>>> How long did they last against a couple of armoured corps?
>>>>
>>>> Remembering that one of them was half British and so equipped with
>>>> antiques that didn't work properly...
>>>>
>>>> March 22nd to April 3rd,  when Baghdad Airport fell wasn't it?
>>>>
>>>> Interesting that the Israeli force structure almost parallels the force
>>>> structure used to invade Iraq.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps they were doing a bit of force management evaluation for 
>>>> them...
>>>>
>>>> After all,  there were a lot of comments about the small size of the
>>>> force used...
>>>>
>>>> <see,  I can do loony tune conspiracy stuff as well>
>>>
>>> really, which De Montfort was it again that said "kill them all god 
>>> will know his own" and you saying "yeah but its a good catchphrase 
>>> isn't it" or something?
>>>
>>> you I would love to have in the cross-hairs...
>>>
>>
>> You'd miss son.
>>
>> I was shooting 1,000 yard targets at the Stickledown when you were 
>> still shitting yellow.
> 
> Hmmm...please elaborate. What weapon were you using?

SMLE No4 Mk 1 modified by George Fulton and Sons of Bisley Camp to fire 
7.62 NATO with a target barrel by Parker Hale (that was the cheap 
option,  can't remember who made the expensive barrels) and fitted with 
Gehmann dipoter sights.  These rifles were fairly common in the late 
'seventies and were usually known as a 'Fulton modification'.

What did you shoot there?

-- 
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of 
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat 
single handed with a quarterstaff.

"William Black"  wrote in message 
news:hcnqrq$cmr$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> True Blue wrote:
>>
>> "William Black"  wrote in message 
>> news:hcnlef$uj1$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:39:26 +0000, William Black wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FrereTuck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> and I say if the armaments tables were equal, the israelis would be
>>>>>> running back to fucking latvia...
>>>>> That hasn't been the case so far.
>>>>>
>>>>> So far the only times the Arabs win is when they're hiding behind
>>>>> civilians and shooting people in the back.
>>>>>
>>>>> So far there's no evidence that they could organise anything bigger 
>>>>> than
>>>>> a murder squad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Iraq was the most highly organised and well equipped Arab army ever.
>>>>>
>>>>> How long did they last against a couple of armoured corps?
>>>>>
>>>>> Remembering that one of them was half British and so equipped with
>>>>> antiques that didn't work properly...
>>>>>
>>>>> March 22nd to April 3rd,  when Baghdad Airport fell wasn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting that the Israeli force structure almost parallels the 
>>>>> force
>>>>> structure used to invade Iraq.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps they were doing a bit of force management evaluation for 
>>>>> them...
>>>>>
>>>>> After all,  there were a lot of comments about the small size of the
>>>>> force used...
>>>>>
>>>>> <see,  I can do loony tune conspiracy stuff as well>
>>>>
>>>> really, which De Montfort was it again that said "kill them all god 
>>>> will know his own" and you saying "yeah but its a good catchphrase 
>>>> isn't it" or something?
>>>>
>>>> you I would love to have in the cross-hairs...
>>>>
>>>
>>> You'd miss son.
>>>
>>> I was shooting 1,000 yard targets at the Stickledown when you were still 
>>> shitting yellow.
>>
>> Hmmm...please elaborate. What weapon were you using?
>
> SMLE No4 Mk 1 modified by George Fulton and Sons of Bisley Camp to fire 
> 7.62 NATO with a target barrel by Parker Hale (that was the cheap option, 
> can't remember who made the expensive barrels) and fitted with Gehmann 
> dipoter sights.  These rifles were fairly common in the late 'seventies 
> and were usually known as a 'Fulton modification'.
>
> What did you shoot there?

I didn't. The best range I ever shot was Sennelager, I can't quite remember 
the maximum range there, but it was vast. 600m is the furthest I've shot. I 
never used anything as exotic as you describe, but I've used a standard LE 
0.303. Although I could shoot SLR all day, 80 rounds with a LE left a bruise 
on the uninitiated shoulder. My favourite weapon of all was the LMG "Light 
Machine Gun" (a 7.62 converted Bren) - a wonderfully sedate and accurate 
tool for pleasure on the ranges. Simple to clean and use, with magazine feed 
and a good, adjustable bipod.

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:18:55 +0000, FrereTuck wrote:

> they certainly would not say that about the jews...
> 
> imagine it... "Juden priese"... ;) they'd be f@ckin falling over
> 'emselves to prosecute...
> 
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/02/schotten_preise/

of course it would not be at all surprising to trace the line back and 
find its a marketing person of jewish descent who though up the whole 
'scottish-price' campaign....