Claire  gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>> > This darkness will not last much longer, Christ *will* return!, He
>> > *will* take His people home, and He *will* wipe away all tears from
>> > the eyes of those who suffered for His sake.
>>
>> > Don't be afraid of them - unless they repent they are dead while they
>> > still walk!  They preen themselves and flaunt their wickedness, they
>> > enact spiteful laws against the children of God - yet they vanish
>> > like dead leaves, without Christ, and without hope!

>> As I said earlier, Claire... do you feel you're marked by the company
>> you keep?

> He has admitted to trolling before. That aside I feel the hostile and
> prejudice attitudes you have expressed

Me? Not at all. I'm merely trying to get you to consider the priorities 
to society in general of your religious preferences against other 
people's basic human rights. It seems that we've just about done that, 
and that - despite your protestations to the contrary - you're convinced 
that your religious preference really IS more important to society in 
general than other people's basic human rights are.

> fuel religious extremism as many people, particularly amongst 
> Evangelical Christians on the political Right, feel under threat for 
> their faith for some of the reasons this poster cleverly parodies!

"Cleverly parodies"? 
<raises eyebrows>

He's serious... He really IS as mad as a box of frogs. Still, it's OK, 
because "God told him". Apparently.

Perhaps you might like to have a little google over some other recent 
threads, and discover some of the other things God told him...

Theology, eh?

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:44:51 -0000, "Mr X"  wrote:

>>>Why should gay people be subject to mob rule?
>>
>> They shouldn't, but it is unfortunately the way life *is*.
>>
>And will stay unless such prejudices are challenged.  If you want rule by 
>daily mail then just keep pandering to their outrage.

Yup, there are *lots* of attitudes I would like to see challenged by
introducing facts and logic.  Attitudes on sex, attitudes on drugs,
attitudes on crime & punishment, your own stated attitude regarding
nudity.

Unfortunately there is no easy way to do so, and attitudes are always
going to be driven by people with political or commercial agendas.

-- 
Cynic

"Cynic"  wrote in message 
news:9uvte5l7o2l8b9dqb06i08s4mqkpskdvlm@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:44:51 -0000, "Mr X"  wrote:
>
>>>>Why should gay people be subject to mob rule?
>>>
>>> They shouldn't, but it is unfortunately the way life *is*.
>>>
>>And will stay unless such prejudices are challenged.  If you want rule by
>>daily mail then just keep pandering to their outrage.
>
> Yup, there are *lots* of attitudes I would like to see challenged by
> introducing facts and logic.  Attitudes on sex, attitudes on drugs,
> attitudes on crime & punishment, your own stated attitude regarding
> nudity.
>
Challenge my attitude any time you like.  I'm not affraid of discussion.
I think the problem is that there are often many different view, all with 
some support and evidence.  Who's to say which attitude is right?

> Unfortunately there is no easy way to do so, and attitudes are always
> going to be driven by people with political or commercial agendas.
>
True.