Multiculturalism Lays Seeds For Future Conflict.  Separatism Is The Most
Humane Way To Organize The World's Peoples.

By James Miller

HUMANS ARE TRIBAL AND INHERENTLY SEPARATIST
Humans are innately "wired" for racial/ethnic/religious/cultural separatism.
Simply look at any large city in America... residents more often than not
self-segregate into ethnic neighborhoods.  Even in multiracial cities such
as Los Angeles & New York, 92% of all marriages are same-race marriages (per
UCLA study, 2006).  Visit any large shopping mall in L.A. or the NY metro
area, sit on a bench for an hour, and conduct your own survey.  You'll
notice that about 90% of groups of two or more people who walk past you
consist of people from the same race.  Visit any school cafeteria and you'll
witness students self-segregating based on race, ie. each ethnicity will
stake out its own lunch tables.  Take a cursory look at the last 6,000 years
of human warfare.  Easily 70% of all wars and other forms of violent
conflicts are rooted in one or more of the following:
racial/ethnic/religious/cultural clashes.  Humanity should learn something
from the cold-hard-fact that people are tribal and they ALWAYS will be.

MULTICULTURALISM LAYS SEEDS FOR FUTURE CONFLICTS
Creating multicultural/multiracial/multiethnic societies (via immigration)
lays the seeds for future tension and eventual violent conflict.  If
multiculturalism were so wonderful, wouldn't Asians seek out white or black
neighborhoods to live in?  Wouldn't blacks seek out hispanic neighborhoods
to live in?  Wouldn't hispanics seek out black neighborhoods?  Wouldn't
Korean immigrants seek out Chinese neighborhoods?  Wouldn't whites seek out
black or hispanic neighborhoods?  Of course this doesn't happen.  Rather,
people seek out a neighborhood inhabited by their own people (ie. same
race/ethnicity).  Of course there are exceptions, but generally, people
self-segregate because they feel more comfortable amongst their own "tribe".

LIBERALS WHO PUSH MULTICULTURALISM USUALLY MEAN WELL, BUT THEY ARE NAIVE
Liberals have a utopian vision of a future world in which people will look
past racial/ethnic/religious differences, ie. everyone will "get along", war
won't occur, peace will prevail, etc.  This sounds nice but it's naive.  In
their quest to build this imagined utopian multicultural world, liberal
elites are actually doing the EXACT opposite - they are laying the seeds for
war and conflict within the nations they've targeted for multiculturalism.
As the violent realities of multiculturalism transpire (as they always do),
liberals then blame ethnic clashes on "racism".  Liberals then embark on the
their usual "education campaign" to "teach" people to be more "tolerant".
But liberals are working against nature and therein lies their folly - you
can't unwire the innate tribal separatist nature of humans.

PRESERVE PRESENT DAY HOMOGENEOUS NATIONS WHILE ENCOURAGING
SEPARATISM IN MULTIRACIAL NATIONS
Nations which are currently ethnically homogeneous (such as Japan), should
be left alone.  In fact, they should be encouraged to maintain their
homogeneous nature.
In multicultural nations, it's a more difficult situation because so much
damage has already been done.  In such nations (eg. United States, UK),
public policy should be altered to encourage racial/ethnic separatism while
at the same time encouraging respect between the different "tribes" (ie.
ethnic groups) so as to avoid intergroup conflicts.  Further, in the United
States, we can start by deporting all illegal aliens and their anchor babies
and stop all immigration.  We should drop absurd slogans like "celebrate
diversity" and replace with something like, "separate and respectful".

Humanity must wake up to the above outlined tribal reality and work within
its constraints.  Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
conflict within a nation.

###

For SERIOUS conservative writing visit my blog:
http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com

On Nov 1, 10:01 pm, "James Miller"  wrote:

>  Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
> conflict within a nation.

No, it causes conflict between those eejits who can't, or won't, get
on with each other.  All we have to do is herd together all those who
practice either religion or politics, drop a bomb on them and
everything would be just fine.  Conflict both within and between
nations is entirely a product of religious and political dogma
poisoning impressionable minds.  Unfortunately, we are too damn
primitive to rid ourselves of either religion or politics currently
but we can dream...

UD

On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:18:06 -0800 (PST), Uncle Dave
 wrote:

>On Nov 1, 10:01 pm, "James Miller"  wrote:
>
>>  Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
>> conflict within a nation.
>
>No, it causes conflict between those eejits who can't, or won't, get
>on with each other.  All we have to do is herd together all those who
>practice either religion or politics, drop a bomb on them and
>everything would be just fine.  Conflict both within and between
>nations is entirely a product of religious and political dogma
>poisoning impressionable minds.  Unfortunately, we are too damn
>primitive to rid ourselves of either religion or politics currently
>but we can dream...
>
>UD

You are a deluded class 1 eejit who is living in a very very tiny
bubble of unreality. When it pops, so will you - and the sooner the
better.

The OP is 100% correct. Only eejits and traitors could possible
disagree.

Uncle Dave wrote:
> On Nov 1, 10:01 pm, "James Miller"  wrote:
> 
>>  Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
>> conflict within a nation.
> 
> No, it causes conflict between those eejits who can't, or won't, get
> on with each other.  All we have to do is herd together all those who
> practice either religion or politics, drop a bomb on them 
How very NAZI of you

On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:01:49 -0800, James Miller wrote:

> Multiculturalism Lays Seeds For Future Conflict.  Separatism Is The Most
> Humane Way To Organize The World's Peoples.
> 
> By James Miller
> 
> HUMANS ARE TRIBAL AND INHERENTLY SEPARATIST
> Humans are innately "wired" for racial/ethnic/religious/cultural separatism.
> Simply look at any large city in America... residents more often than not
> self-segregate into ethnic neighborhoods.  Even in multiracial cities such
> as Los Angeles & New York, 92% of all marriages are same-race marriages (per
> UCLA study, 2006).  Visit any large shopping mall in L.A. or the NY metro
> area, sit on a bench for an hour, and conduct your own survey.  You'll
> notice that about 90% of groups of two or more people who walk past you
> consist of people from the same race.  Visit any school cafeteria and you'll
> witness students self-segregating based on race, ie. each ethnicity will
> stake out its own lunch tables.  Take a cursory look at the last 6,000 years
> of human warfare.  Easily 70% of all wars and other forms of violent
> conflicts are rooted in one or more of the following:
> racial/ethnic/religious/cultural clashes.  Humanity should learn something
> from the cold-hard-fact that people are tribal and they ALWAYS will be.
> 
> MULTICULTURALISM LAYS SEEDS FOR FUTURE CONFLICTS
> Creating multicultural/multiracial/multiethnic societies (via immigration)
> lays the seeds for future tension and eventual violent conflict.  If
> multiculturalism were so wonderful, wouldn't Asians seek out white or black
> neighborhoods to live in?  Wouldn't blacks seek out hispanic neighborhoods
> to live in?  Wouldn't hispanics seek out black neighborhoods?  Wouldn't
> Korean immigrants seek out Chinese neighborhoods?  Wouldn't whites seek out
> black or hispanic neighborhoods?  Of course this doesn't happen.  Rather,
> people seek out a neighborhood inhabited by their own people (ie. same
> race/ethnicity).  Of course there are exceptions, but generally, people
> self-segregate because they feel more comfortable amongst their own "tribe".
> 
> LIBERALS WHO PUSH MULTICULTURALISM USUALLY MEAN WELL, BUT THEY ARE NAIVE
> Liberals have a utopian vision of a future world in which people will look
> past racial/ethnic/religious differences, ie. everyone will "get along", war
> won't occur, peace will prevail, etc.  This sounds nice but it's naive.  In
> their quest to build this imagined utopian multicultural world, liberal
> elites are actually doing the EXACT opposite - they are laying the seeds for
> war and conflict within the nations they've targeted for multiculturalism.
> As the violent realities of multiculturalism transpire (as they always do),
> liberals then blame ethnic clashes on "racism".  Liberals then embark on the
> their usual "education campaign" to "teach" people to be more "tolerant".
> But liberals are working against nature and therein lies their folly - you
> can't unwire the innate tribal separatist nature of humans.
> 
> PRESERVE PRESENT DAY HOMOGENEOUS NATIONS WHILE ENCOURAGING
> SEPARATISM IN MULTIRACIAL NATIONS
> Nations which are currently ethnically homogeneous (such as Japan), should
> be left alone.  In fact, they should be encouraged to maintain their
> homogeneous nature.
> In multicultural nations, it's a more difficult situation because so much
> damage has already been done.  In such nations (eg. United States, UK),
> public policy should be altered to encourage racial/ethnic separatism while
> at the same time encouraging respect between the different "tribes" (ie.
> ethnic groups) so as to avoid intergroup conflicts.  Further, in the United
> States, we can start by deporting all illegal aliens and their anchor babies
> and stop all immigration.  We should drop absurd slogans like "celebrate
> diversity" and replace with something like, "separate and respectful".
> 
> Humanity must wake up to the above outlined tribal reality and work within
> its constraints.  Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
> conflict within a nation.
> 
> ###
> 
> For SERIOUS conservative writing visit my blog:
> http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com

There is a big difference between the voluntary system of separatism you 
outlined earlier and the enforced system you are proposing.
 


-- 
¡§Of all the extreme fanaticism which plays havoc in man¡¦s nature, there is 
not one as irrational as anti-Semitism. ¡K If the Jews are rich [these 
fanatics] are victims of theft. If they are poor, they are victims of 
ridicule. If they take sides in a war, it is because they wish to take 
advantage from the spilling of non-Jewish blood. If they espouse peace, it 
is because they are scared by their natures or traitors. If the Jew dwells 
in a foreign land he is persecuted and expelled. If he wishes to return to 
his own land, he is prevented from doing so.¡¨

Lloyd George

On Nov 2, 3:14 am, jake  wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:18:06 -0800 (PST), Uncle Dave
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> >On Nov 1, 10:01 pm, "James Miller"  wrote:
>
> >>  Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
> >> conflict within a nation.
>
> >No, it causes conflict between those eejits who can't, or won't, get
> >on with each other.  All we have to do is herd together all those who
> >practice either religion or politics, drop a bomb on them and
> >everything would be just fine.  Conflict both within and between
> >nations is entirely a product of religious and political dogma
> >poisoning impressionable minds.  Unfortunately, we are too damn
> >primitive to rid ourselves of either religion or politics currently
> >but we can dream...
>
> >UD
>
> You are a deluded class 1 eejit who is living in a very very tiny
> bubble of unreality. When it pops, so will you - and the sooner the
> better.

Case proven I think.

UD

On Nov 2, 8:19 am, John Bennett  wrote:
> Uncle Dave wrote:
> > On Nov 1, 10:01 pm, "James Miller"  wrote:
>
> >>  Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
> >> conflict within a nation.
>
> > No, it causes conflict between those eejits who can't, or won't, get
> > on with each other.  All we have to do is herd together all those who
> > practice either religion or politics, drop a bomb on them
>
> How very NAZI of you

Watch it smart arse or you'll be first against wall.

UD

On Nov 1, 4:18 pm, Uncle Dave  wrote:
> On Nov 1, 10:01 pm, "James Miller"  wrote:
>
> >  Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
> > conflict within a nation.

>   Conflict both within and between
> nations is entirely a product of religious and political dogma
> poisoning impressionable minds.

You left out inherent bigotry and racism and desire to control
and rule over others.   The ZioNazi Jews are a fine example.
Many ZioNazis are atheists, no religion involved, just desire
for power and control.

The OP is right.  People prefer to stick with their own kind.
Examples are myriad.   When I go to a football game at my
old high school, the whites sit on roughly one half the home
side of the stadium, the blacks the other.   In the lunchrooms,
same thing.  No one forces anything, it is what all prefer.
The anti-American pukes running the public schools have tried
various tricks to "fix" things, e.g. at the ramdon blowing of a
whitle,
have a student "go over to someone you normally don't associate
with and get to know them better."   Translation:  get your white
ass over there and cuddle up to some black, hopefully it will
lead to a multi-racial offspring.

Ever wonder why home schooling & private schools are growing
by leaps & bounds?