http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6898174.ece

"According to Neather, who was present at secret meetings during the summer 
of 2000, the government had "a driving political purpose" which was: "mass 
immigration was the way that the government was going to make the UK truly 
multicultural".

What's more, Neather said he came away "from some discussions with the clear 
sense that the policy was intended - even if this wasn't its main purpose - 
to rub the right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date".

Ministers longed for an immigration boom but wouldn't talk about it, he 
wrote. "They probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while 
ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, 
it wasn't necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men's clubs in 
Sheffield or Sunderland."

The revelations get worse. "There was a reluctance ... in government," he 
wrote, "to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all for 
Labour's core white working-class vote." The social outcomes that ministers 
cared about were those affecting the immigrants. This, Neather explains, 
shone out in a report published in 2001 after these confidential 
deliberations.

One must question whether this is true. Needless to say, Straw has denied 
all this and Neather has since tried to back-pedal."

****

Granted only a comment piece but the 'readers letters' section below is 
probably a better indicator of just how this is being received amongst the 
proles.

As I see it the problem for Call Me Dave and the Nu-sTories is that 
throughout the attempted destruction of this nation they have mostly sung 
from the same 'diversity is great' song sheet. To now pursue this matter 
will leave them open to the question; "Where is the problem?"

In order to answer they will surely leave themselves accessible to the 
charge that they perceive a negative aspect to the world and his dog taking 
up residence here other than the overcrowding argument.

"Is Diversity Not Wonderful?"

"Do The Nu-sTories Not Believe We Have Been Enriched?"

I now believe that under the guidance of the LLCs we are completely 
incapable of having the much vaunted "Honest Debate On Immigration" due to 
so many of the attendant aspects directly contradicting the orthodoxy 
supported by the 3 parties throughout the past decade.

The problem as I see it is that demographics is now the issue, over and 
above shutting the stable door.

This simply reality, exposed in the ONS report, makes this issue far more 
important but ultimately more than a little dangerous.

We the much derided 'indigenous British' are in a game plan wherein inaction 
costs us not only space but ever an encroaching adaptation of the 'culture' 
we are repeatedly informed we do not have.

Aramis Gunton wrote:
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6898174.ece 



Looking on the bright side of things, one, 'Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera' ( 
who, it would appear, is one of the beneficiaries of this treason) 
assures us in a reply to the Times article, that although;

"I find the core ethos and tenets of the BNP, UKIP and any other party 
spouting intolerance and jingoistic rhetoric to be abhorrent, but 
naturally I do support people rights to hold such warped views albeit 
these must not manifest themselves in there actions"

It's extremely decent of Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera to allow me to 
hold 'warped views' in what was, until quite recently, my own country....

Tolerant colonisation, indeed.

But not tolerant enough, however, to make me wish anything other than 
that Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera was currently boarding a flight to 
anywhere else except here.

On Nov 1, 12:55 pm, The gods have made us mad
 wrote:
> Aramis Gunton wrote:
> >http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/ar...
>
> Looking on the bright side of things, one, 'Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera' (
> who, it would appear, is one of the beneficiaries of this treason)
> assures us in a reply to the Times article, that although;
>
> "I find the core ethos and tenets of the BNP, UKIP and any other party
> spouting intolerance and jingoistic rhetoric to be abhorrent, but
> naturally I do support people rights to hold such warped views albeit
> these must not manifest themselves in there actions"
>
> It's extremely decent of Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera to allow me to
> hold 'warped views' in what was, until quite recently, my own country....
>
> Tolerant colonisation, indeed.
>
> But not tolerant enough, however, to make me wish anything other than
> that Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera was currently boarding a flight to
> anywhere else except here.

Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera may be pleased to take a free flight
to any where to get away from the rising anger that is beginning to
engulf  the normally tolerant Real-British.

On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 05:42:15 -0800 (PST), Jon° 
wrote:

>On Nov 1, 12:55 pm, The gods have made us mad
> wrote:
>> Aramis Gunton wrote:
>> >http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/ar...
>>
>> Looking on the bright side of things, one, 'Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera' (
>> who, it would appear, is one of the beneficiaries of this treason)
>> assures us in a reply to the Times article, that although;
>>
>> "I find the core ethos and tenets of the BNP, UKIP and any other party
>> spouting intolerance and jingoistic rhetoric to be abhorrent, but
>> naturally I do support people rights to hold such warped views albeit
>> these must not manifest themselves in there actions"
>>
>> It's extremely decent of Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera to allow me to
>> hold 'warped views' in what was, until quite recently, my own country....
>>
>> Tolerant colonisation, indeed.
>>
>> But not tolerant enough, however, to make me wish anything other than
>> that Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera was currently boarding a flight to
>> anywhere else except here.
>
>Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera may be pleased to take a free flight
>to any where to get away from the rising anger that is beginning to
>engulf  the normally tolerant Real-British.

Like we really need so many foreigners to tell us how bat we all are -
and to make us pay them for the privilege of so doing.

btw Aid to Africa is worse than connecting the output of the Royal
Mint to a giant shredder.

"The gods have made us mad"  wrote in message 
news:4AED8528.8060709@destruction.com...
> Aramis Gunton wrote:
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6898174.ece
>
>
>
> Looking on the bright side of things, one, 'Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera' ( who, 
> it would appear, is one of the beneficiaries of this treason) assures us 
> in a reply to the Times article, that although;
>
> "I find the core ethos and tenets of the BNP, UKIP and any other party 
> spouting intolerance and jingoistic rhetoric to be abhorrent, but 
> naturally I do support people rights to hold such warped views albeit 
> these must not manifest themselves in there actions"
>
> It's extremely decent of Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera to allow me to 
> hold 'warped views' in what was, until quite recently, my own country....
>
> Tolerant colonisation, indeed.
>
> But not tolerant enough, however, to make me wish anything other than that 
> Mr/Mrs/Ms Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera was currently boarding a flight to 
> anywhere else except here.

I wonder what views he's referring to, that "must not manifest themselves in 
actions". I'd wager that curbing immigration and striking down race-specific 
legislation are actions unacceptable to our new judges.