|
|
|
date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:22:23 +0100,
group: uk.politics.misc
back
the nancy pollution-obarmy-illitereid poor health enabling bill...
i'm watching the marxist obarmy loony toons as they unwind one
after another, square miles of meaningless unreidable
dribble...
yet commentators by the dozen just don't seem to get it....
this is *standard* marxist practice....
bore everyone to death before passing some seditious
anti-democratic crap once everyone has gone home
or has drooped off to sleep....
this so-called health bill is *deliberately* unreadable and
incomprehensible....it is not some sort of accident....
it is *policy* to make it inaccessible....
regards
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc over 1 million document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:22:23 +0100
author: abelard
|
Re: the nancy pollution-obarmy-illitereid poor health enabling
bill...
It's a clone of the General Motors bailout - corporate welfare for
another failing industry, and a massive new TAX. Like the bailout of
General Motors - another company without enough customers - Obamacare
is corporate welfare for Blue Cross, Aetna, Cigna etc. by forcing
people to become their customers.
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/08/04/where-is-your-townhall/ is
the all-states, continually-updated calendar of "town halls."
http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com - your source for hard-to-find stuff!
date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: the nancy pollution-obarmy-illitereid poor health enabling bill...
"abelard" wrote in message
news:rikpe5923voa2nsk9cjl4euth7luia1hmj@4ax.com...
> this so-called health bill is *deliberately* unreadable and
> incomprehensible....it is not some sort of accident....
> it is *policy* to make it inaccessible....
Sometimes the idea that you should understand things as stupidity rather
than malice doesn't stack up, does it?
"The aim of this treaty is to be unreadable" Karel de Gucht, Belgian Foreign
Minister.
date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:54:10 -0000
author: DVH
|
Re: the nancy pollution-obarmy-illitereid poor health enabling bill...
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:54:10 -0000, "DVH" wrote:
>
>"abelard" wrote in message
>news:rikpe5923voa2nsk9cjl4euth7luia1hmj@4ax.com...
>
>> this so-called health bill is *deliberately* unreadable and
>> incomprehensible....it is not some sort of accident....
>> it is *policy* to make it inaccessible....
>
>Sometimes the idea that you should understand things as stupidity rather
>than malice doesn't stack up, does it?
>
>"The aim of this treaty is to be unreadable" Karel de Gucht, Belgian Foreign
>Minister.
europe is more used to dishonest lunatics...
america has been used to honest crooks....
now they have a bunch of dishonest lunatics....
it troubles me that they are not adjusting well or fast...
regards
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc over 1 million document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:27:42 +0100
author: abelard
|
Re: the nancy pollution-obarmy-illitereid poor health enabling bill...
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:22:23 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, abelard
, wrote
>this so-called health bill is *deliberately* unreadable and
> incomprehensible....it is not some sort of accident....
>it is *policy* to make it inaccessible....
Obviously "nancy pollution" here is a pun on Pelosi. For UK consumption
it can be well be taken another way -- nancy boy obarma.
Europe as a whole wanted an weak American President. Now -- as the
editorial winds blow -- they aren't so sure............. In UK Telegraph
editorials "President Pantywaist" seems to be a popular appellation.
As I recall, a few weeks ago even some high member of France was miffed at
how weakly obama presented himself on some international question. I
imagine Steyn would put that as 'when you're American and French
nationalism is too strong meat for you, you have some serious
problems......' or something similar.
Anyway, to the subject...................
During his campaign, the obamanation said that he would 'bring a new
transparency' to Washington: throw light on Federal legislation, have open
and interactive discussions with the people legislation, etc.........
He lied. ....as you know.
If you read the blog article under the subject heading "imagine" in
uk.politics.misc yesterday, similar things are happening now in America
............with a vengeance.
We should expect anything different from someone admired by Hugo Chavez?
Here's an allegory, one of largest and the most ambitious projects in the
20th century was the interstate highway system. The entire bill was 26
pages.
FACE
date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:43:51 -0500
author: FACE
|
Re: the nancy pollution-obarmy-illitereid poor health enabling bill...
FACE wrote
> Obviously "nancy pollution" here is a pun on Pelosi. For UK consumption
> it can be well be taken another way -- nancy boy obarma.
>
Frankhappy
date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:14:33 -0500
author: Tim Elliot
|
|
|