Re: "Rudd's $700 billion bank guarantee" - Libs give Bi-Partisan
Support
On Oct 12, 9:52 pm, kangarooistan wrote:
> On Oct 13, 6:29 am, fasgnadh wrote:
>
> > This is not my text, you have joined the dishonest low life
> > forgers, PomPom and Blow Job Fosterchild, who, unable to
> > mount an argument, instead mount each other:
>
> > # >> Apparently there hundreds of banks ready to go under. If the fed.
> > # >> insurance plan works and your bank closes you can get you money
> > # >> in a matter of a few weeks. Suppose the system becomes overwhelmed> > # >> And do you have unlimited confidence in the Federal government?
>
> > Those are YOUR words.. NOT MINE!!!!! That is a forgery.
> > Your post shows that as attributed to me, as if you are
> > replying to it. It is YOUR words. Why are you so ashamed of
> > YOUR BULLSHIT that you try and attribute it to me?
>
> Yep fas , you may be right , it seems my reply failed to comply with
> the correct method and included a cut and past from an earlier reply
> on this same hot topic by "ted" i think
>
> my error
>
> I assumed you would and others also would see the majority of my reply
> started after your mention of turnbull
>
> but easy fixed mate , forgive my error , it wont ever happen again
>
> kanga
> =====
>
> Seeing how offendedyou are I wont ever reply again
Fight! Fight!
date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|