Re: "Rudd's $700 billion bank guarantee" - Libs give Bi-Partisan
Support
On Oct 13, 6:29 am, fasgnadh wrote:
> This is not my text, you have joined the dishonest low life
> forgers, PomPom and Blow Job Fosterchild, who, unable to
> mount an argument, instead mount each other:
>
> # >> Apparently there hundreds of banks ready to go under. If the fed.
> # >> insurance plan works and your bank closes you can get you money
> # >> in a matter of a few weeks. Suppose the system becomes overwhelmed?
> # >> And do you have unlimited confidence in the Federal government?
>
> Those are YOUR words.. NOT MINE!!!!! That is a forgery.
> Your post shows that as attributed to me, as if you are
> replying to it. It is YOUR words. Why are you so ashamed of
> YOUR BULLSHIT that you try and attribute it to me?
Yep fas , you may be right , it seems my reply failed to comply with
the correct method and included a cut and past from an earlier reply
on this same hot topic by "ted" i think
my error
I assumed you would and others also would see the majority of my reply
started after your mention of turnbull
but easy fixed mate , forgive my error , it wont ever happen again
kanga
=====
Seeing how offendedyou are I wont ever reply again
date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
author: kangarooistan
|