On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 18:31:01 -0700, tankfixer 
wrote:

>In article , none <""bbb\"@
>(none)"> says...
>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:51:29 -0700, tankfixer
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> >In article , none <""bbb\"@
>> >(none)"> says...
>> >> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:59:18 -0700, tankfixer
>> >>  wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >In article , none <""bbb\"@
>> >> >(none)"> says...
>> >> >> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:20:05 -0400, Sentry  wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > <none <""bbb\"@(none)">> wrote: 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> The American people never get to select their own candidates. They
>> >> >> >> only get their candidates selected by the rich and powerful so that
>> >> >> >> they can cast a vote between the chosen two. It's nothing but a
>> >> >> >> symbolic gesture since either candidate must follow the order of the
>> >> >> >> wealthy elite no matter what.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The USA is a sad notion of democracy in many ways.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Only two political party's?
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I honestly can not see the point of multi-party politics. Since it is
>> >> >> only for one nation, why can't everybody work together as one party?
>> >> >> Why must there be fight between each other? Perhaps, someone hiding
>> >> >> behind the scene does not really want either party to have the real
>> >> >> control of the country...
>> >> >> 
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Why not just have an emperor ?
>> >> >
>> >> >Who needs parties right ?
>> >> >Just do as the leader says.
>> >> 
>> >> Actually, that is not a bad idea at all, if you truly understand the
>> >> function of emperor.
>> >
>> >We can just watch China now.
>> >They have reverted to one even if they don't know it.
>> 
>> Good for them. I'm sure that's another unexpected reason that keeps
>> the Chinese people united and strong.
>
>When was that ?
>A 1000 years ago ?

Why ask me? I didn't say anything about reverting.

>
>All you have is a petty despot now..

I'm not sure what you are talking about. Are you sure you know what
you are talking about yourself?