On 9ÔÂ8ÈÕ, ÉÏÎç6ʱ49·Ö, "Chom Noamsky"  wrote:
>  wrote in message:
> > You are a very veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeryyyyyyyyy innocent person.  This
> > is why now I understand why Jack Cafferty has to be hired by CNN to
> > appeal to lives as low as you are intellectually.
>
> You know what is funny, you keep saying the 'white trash' have a problem
> discriminating between 'the people' and 'the government' of China.  In a
> real democracy the government is representative of the people, we don't need
> to distinguish between the two because they are one and the same social
> strata.  Only when making references to China does one need to be
> "sensitive" about confusing the ruling class with the people.
>
> How many times do I hear Chinese people on Usenet profess their love and
> support for their government, then when Jack Cafferty calls 'them' a bunch
> of 'goons' and 'thugs', the same characters trip over themselves in the rush
> to seperate themselves from government.
>
> In other words, "we love our government, just don't confuse us with those
> goons and thugs."

Have you done a counting of the population of China in general?  What
is the % of the Chinese who are able to get onto international usernet
and express themselves freely?  Even if the Chinese people you have
read in usernet love their government, does it mean that government,
especially after the market reform, has not done a good thing?  That
government, which was very repressive under Mao, has managed to move
millions out of poverty in 30 years time spent.  Thus inspite of its
political imperfection, it has to be given some credit in this area.

Do you know of any perfect government in the world?  Every government
has to be assessed by yardsticks that are relative to time and space.
What is good today may not be good tomorrow!

Go and take some courses at universities in political science and
economics.