On 9ÔÂ7ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç9ʱ55·Ö, "Chom Noamsky"  wrote:
> >  wrote in message:
> > Before you start your warm-up daily writing exercises, I want to make
> > one thing perfectly clear.  All criticism at the ruling clique of any
> > country is welcomed but leave the people alone.
>
> On the contrary, one class enables the other.  The only path to true reform
> is through revolt and revolution.  The lower social strata Chinese are
> compliant like good cattle, revolt and reform have been bred out of them.
>
> > By the way, 'white
> > trash of Canada' is not equivalent to the poor white people of
> > Canada.  It refers to those who are too intellectually incapable of
> > telling the ruling class from the people and as such need Jack
> > Cafferty to explain to them.
>
> Everyone

How on earth do you know 'everyone' knew except the Chinese? have you
done a fucking counting?  Don't just use 'everyone'...'all
people'  ...this sort of collective nouns to disguise your ignorance
in argument.  Everyone is not empirical unless you have done a survey
of everyone.

=================================


> knew what Cafferty meant except a lot of Chinese.  That's an easy
> mistake for Chinese to make since open criticism of government results in
> bad things happening to them.  Obviously, in Chinese cultural context,
> Cafferty could only be referring to the people as goons and thugs.  The
> intellectual deficit here is with the Chinese who are molded from birth not
> to offend gov't or their rulers.