On 9ÔÂ7ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç10ʱ14·Ö, "Chom Noamsky"  wrote:
> >  wrote in message:
>
> > Then Jack should have gone to school and learn to speak tactfully next
> > time.
>
> After Cafferty spoke his words thousands of Chinese-Americans rallied
> outside CNN to protest what he said.  They exercised the democratic rights
> and freedoms guaranteed to them under the American Constitution, and they
> used them to defend a one party Communist state where the people have few
> rights and are treated as subjects of the state.  Don't you find that
> extremely ironic?  Sure, Cafferty could have candy coated his comments, but
> why should he?  What he said was the truth.  Obvioudly, the Chinese have a
> long way to go towards political enlightenment.

You are not getting the point.  Jack Cafferty should have attacked the
ruling clique and did so by naming it correctly.  But as i said, for
him to explain to the white trash of NA the difference between the
ruling clique and the ordinary people who are struggling hard to put
food on the table is as difficult as it is for him to explain the
difference between a Rolex and a Seiko to a monkey.