Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:33:12 -0500,    group: uk.politics.misc        back       
Peter Lamborn Wilson (aka Hakim Bey) On Islam   
Peter Lamborn Wilson (aka Hakim Bey) On Islam
Monday, July 21 2008 @ 05:21 PM CDT

ReligionAP: Would you define yourself as a Muslim, and if so, what kind of Islam would you say 
you practice amongst the multiplicity of different forms?

PLW: Well, I've been many things in my life and I don't renounce any of them. But I don't 
necessarily practice any of them on a daily basis either. I never renounced Christianity or if 
I did, I take it back. I've been involved in Tantric things that I guess you could call 
Hinduism, although that's a very vague term. I practice Shia Islam.

Peter Lamborn Wilson (aka Hakim Bey) On Islam

Interview conducted by the Affinity Project in January 2006; Published in July 2008.

AP = Affinity Project
PLW = Peter Lamborn Wilson

*

AP: Would you define yourself as a Muslim, and if so, what kind of Islam would you say you 
practice amongst the multiplicity of different forms?

PLW: Well, I've been many things in my life and I don't renounce any of them. But I don't 
necessarily practice any of them on a daily basis either. I never renounced Christianity or if 
I did, I take it back. I've been involved in Tantric things that I guess you could call 
Hinduism, although that's a very vague term. I practice Shia Islam. I still consider myself all 
those things but, obviously that's a difficult position to take vis-a-vis the orthodox 
practitioners of these different faiths. So, if I had to define my position now in terms that 
would be historically meaningful in an Islamic context, I would refer to Hazrat Inayat Khan and 
his idea of universalism, that all religions are true. And if this involves contradiction, as 
Emerson said, OK. We'll just deal with it on a different level. And the inspiration for this in 
his case was Indian synchrotism, between Hinduism and Islam especially, although other 
religions were involved too such as Christianity, Judaism and others. This happened on both a 
non-literate level of the peasantry and still persists to this day on that level, and also 
occurred on a very high level of intellectual Sufism which was almost a courtly thing at 
certain times, especially under some of the wilder Mughal rulers like Akbar who started Din-i 
Ilahi. So these things have precedents within the Islamic traditions, this universalism, this 
radical tolerance would be another way of putting it, but nowadays of course it's hard to find 
this praxis on the ground. I can't practice some Indian village cult here, that would be a 
little--well I sort of do, you know--but actually (laughs), it's highly personal.

AP: Would you say that it's radically tolerant or radically accepting? I would say that there 
is a distinction between tolerance and acceptance.

PLW: I know what you're getting at. Tolerance in this sense is a kind of weak position, and 
acceptance would be a strong position?

AP: I would say that, for example, I can tolerate homosexuals, Muslim homosexuals, or I can say 
well I accept them in the fold of Islam because they define themselves as Muslim.

PLW: Using the term in that sense, what I mean by radical tolerance is what you're calling 
acceptance. In other words it's not just ecumenicalism here. It's not a reformist position. 
It's a pretty radical position. And it got Hazrat Inayat Khan in a lot of trouble amongst 
orthodox Muslims. This movement still suffers from that today. But in India, there is this 
tradition of that, it still persists in India more than in other countries where the 
fundamentalist/reformist/modernist thing has swept away the so-called medieval creations which 
make up all the charm and difference. That's what they hate.

AP: What is it that interested or intrigued you in Islam in particular? And I believe you were 
introduced to it in Morocco, was it?

PLW: Well really, in New York. This goes back to the 60s and my involvement in one of the--I 
guess you could say--new religions of that era which came out of Moor Science tradition. I 
don't know if you've read any of my stuff on this. So already in New York I was taking an 
interest in these things.

AP: And why was that?

PLW: Well, because I got contact into that movement and also began to read Al-Ghazali on the 
recommendation of some of the people in that movement and we all became very interested in 
trying to find out whether there was such a thing as living Sufism. This was the 60s, there was 
no 'new-age' there on the ground. None of these people were so visibly active. Anyway, we 
didn't find them. So that was one of my reasons for going to the East.

Keep reading at http://affinityproject.org/interviews/plw1.html
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:33:12 -0500   author:   Ramabriga

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us