"Jews always position themselves as mediators. These
nasties hold it cardinal they accredit and interpret *everything*.
Nothing has worth or meaning until it's pronounced upon by a generous
scoop of shit in a hate hat. Nothing must be expressed save in jewish
terms. Invaders become undocumented workers. Queers become gays.
Freakins become African-Americans. Attack on Iraq becomes defense of
America. Nothing is legitimate save Big Kike stamp off on it.

BK doesn't like it when a Sheehan steps forward and foghorns facts to
fodder. Instantly, like mosquitoes at twilight, a flock of
bloodthirsty kikes appears, buzzing and sucking and whining. Have you
ever noticed that it is impossible to criticize jews and keep your
character? The jews have literally billions of enemies worldwide, yet
not a single one of them is an honest man of laudable motive. It is
impossible to carry off this charade without controlling the media 
and a hell of a lot of other things too. The minute jew-criticism
appears, the ashkenazis and appeaser annies begin the smear. No one
ever opposed a loving kike except invidiously. Smear campaigns are
media control in action. There are other aspects of media control, but
day in day out, making horrible shrieks and gurgles to keep the goyish
herd away from the healthy green fields is the workaday business of
the controllers. Jews determine which issues may be debated, and in
what terms. Jews make up more than fifty percent of the experts on
both sides of these tiny debates. A few vetted goyim are allowed
through to keep up the charade of democratic discussion. The Internet
is the only medium that prevents the illusion of popular conformity
with jewthink being carried off. All that is necessary for jews to
maintain control is to create a congenial if bogus reality through
television and the main dailies, and relentlessly enforce this
orthodoxy through smear campaigns against any who breach it.

The death of a son is one of the few motives strong enough to drive
average goy fodder to breach etiquette and speak truth to kikes. She
must be shut down. How to do that? You can see the jews' uncertainty.
They attack her, at the same time, as both a lefty and a nazi.
Illogical, but in time they'll settle on an approach. Sometimes just
throwing shit and see what sticks is the best way. How dare Sheehan
value her own son more than the interests of Israel?

  I say my son died for LIES. George Bush LIED to us and he knew he
  was LYING.

And none of the thick rancid honkings Limbaugh and the freeper
patriotards can gainsay it. Remember that bushy came out of manly
Barbara, the wizened maw who asked why she should trouble her
"beautiful mind" about the body bags coming back from Iraq. You know -
the ones you never see, because they have to show you endless pictures
of $440,000-compensated jews being "ethnically cleansed," sniff, yet
again. Only an anti-Semite puts his own life before Israel. The jews
are the one people on earth who routinely are absolved of guilt for
that for which they and they alone are guilty. Isn't that odd?

DaX

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.ihr.org/      http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Topaz wrote:
> 
> "Jews always position
--------------------------
None of your Nazi lies.
Steve

Report of Former Vice President Spiro Agnew
"The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish and,
with other influential Jews, helped create a disastrous U.S. Mideast
policy. All you have to do is check the real policy makers and owners
and you find a much higher concentration of Jewish people than you're
going to find in the population. By national impact media I am
referring to the major news wire services, pollsters, Time and
Newsweek Magazines, the New York Times, Washington Post, and the
International Herald Tribune. For example, CBS' Mr. (William) Paley's
Jewish. Mr. Julian Goodman, who runs NBC, and there's a Leonard
Goldenson at ABC. Mrs. Katherine Graham owns the Washington Post and
Mr. Sulzberger the New York Times. They are all Jews!
You go down the line in that fashion...not just with ownership but go
down to the managing posts and discretionary posts... and you'll find
that through their aggressiveness and their inventiveness, they now
dominate the news media. Not only in the media, but in academic
communities, the financial communities, in the foundations, in all
sorts of highly visible and influential services that involve the
public, they now have a tremendous voice.
Our policy in the Middle East in my judgment is disastrous, because
it's not even handed. I see no reason why nearly half the foreign aid
this nation has to give goes to Israel, except for the influence of
this Zionist lobby. I think the power of the news media is in the
hands of a few people...it's not subject to control of the voters,
it's subject only to the whim of the board of directors." (Former Vice
President Spiro Agnew)


Charles A. Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941
1st Statement:
"We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence on our
press, radio, and motion pictures. It may become very serious.
(Fulton) Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising
firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual
System if a certain feature was permitted to go on the air. The threat
was powerful enough to have the feature removed." (Charles A.
Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941).
Charles A. Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941
2nd Statement:
Thursday, May 1, 1941: "The pressure for war is high and mounting. The
people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have 'the
bit in its teeth' and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the
Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a
huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures.
There are the 'intellectuals' and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British
agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial
interests, and many others." (The Wartime Journals)


The Jews Own The Press-The Siege
"The Jews...are at the root of regicide, they own the periodical
press, they have in their hands the financial markets, the people as a
whole fall into financial slavery to them..." (The Siege, p. 38)


Nat Rosenberg, International Jewish News
"Federation played a major part in Jewish life throughout the world.
There is a federation in every community of the world where there is a
substantial number of Jews. Today there is a central movement that is
capable of mustering all of its planning, financial and political
resources within twenty-four hours, geared to handling any particular
issue. Proportionately, we have more power than any other comparable
group, far beyond our numbers. The reason is that we are probably the
most well organized minority in the world." (Nat Rosenberg, Denver
Allied Jewish Federation, International Jewish News, January 30, 1976)


Martin Peretz, New Republic Editor-in-Chief
"Much of what you have read about the war in Lebanon-and even more of
what you have seen and heard on television - is simply not true." (New
Republic Editor-in-chief Martin Peretz)


Pastoral letter issued in 1936
"A Jewish question exists, and there will be one as long as the Jews
remain Jews. It is an actual fact that the Jews fight against the
Catholic Church. They are free thinkers, and constitute a vanguard of
Atheism, Bolshevism and Revolution...One should protect one's self
against the evil influence of Jewish morals, and particularly boycott
the Jewish Press and their demoralizing publications." (Pastoral
letter issued in 1936. "An Answer to Father Caughlin's Critics," page
98) top of page
Cecile De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 135
Among modern nations with their short memories, the Jewish
people...Whether despised or feared it remains an eternal stranger. it
comes without invitation and remains even when driven out. It is
scattered and yet coherent. It takes up its abode in the very body of
the nations. It creates laws beyond and above the laws. It denies the
idea of a homeland but it possesses its own homeland which it carries
along with it and establishes wherever it goes. It denies the god of
other peoples and everywhere rebuilds the temple. It complains of its
isolation, and by mysterious channels it links together the parts of
the infinite New Jerusalem which covers the whole universe. It has
connections and ties everywhere, which explains how capital and the
Press, concentrated in its hands, conserve the same designs in every
country of the world, and the interests of the race which are
identical in Ruthenian villages and in the City of New York; if it
extols someone he is glorified all over the world, and if it wishes to
ruin someone the work of destruction is carried out as if directed by
a single hand.
The orders come from the depths of Mysterious Darkness. That which the
Jew jeers at and destroys among other peoples, it fanatically
preserves in the bosom of Judaism. If it teaches revolt and anarchy to
others, it in itself shows admirable obedience to its invisible
guides.
In the time of the Turkish revolution, a Jew said proudly to my
father: 'It is we who are making it, we, the Young Turks, the Jews.'
During the Portuguese revolution, I heard the Marquis de Vasconcellos,
Portuguese ambassador at Rome, say 'The Jews and the Free Masons are
directing the revolution in Lisbon.' Today when the greater part of
Europe is given up to the revolution, they are everywhere leading the
movement, according to a single plan. How did they succeed in
concealing this plan which embraced the whole world and which was not
the work of a few months or even years? They used as a screen men of
each country, blind, frivolous, venal, forward, or stupid, and who
knew nothing. And thus they worked in security, these redoubtable
organizers, these sons of an ancient race which knows how to keep a
secret. And that is why none of them has betrayed the others." (Cecile
De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 135; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 141-143)


J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, 1920
"An intelligent man, thoroughly familiar with the newspapers, can,
after half an hour conversation, tell anyone what newspaper he
reads...even high prelates of Rome, even Cardinals Amette and Mercier
show themselves more influenced by the Press of their country than
they themselves probably realize...often I have noticed that it is
according to his newspaper that one judges the Papal Bull or the
speech of the Prime Minister." (J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna,
1920; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 171)

J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204
"The great telegraphic agencies of the world which are everywhere the
principal source of news for the Press (just as wholesale businesses
supply the retailers), which spreads far and wide that which the world
should know or should not know, and in the form which they wish, these
agencies are either Jewish property or obey Jewish direction. The
situation is the same for the smaller agencies which supply news to
the newspapers of less importance, the great publicity agencies which
receive commercial advertisements and which then insert them in the
newspapers at the price of a large commission for themselves, are
principally in the hands of the Jews; so are many provincial
newspapers. Even when the Jewish voice is not heard directly in the
Press, there comes into play the great indirect influences, Free
Masonry, Finance, etc.
In many places Jews content themselves with this hidden influence,
just as in economic life they consider Joint-Stock companies as the
most profitable. The editors may quite well be Aryans, it is
sufficient that in all important questions they should stand for
Jewish interests, or at least that they should not oppose them. This
is achieved nearly always by the pressure of advertisement agencies."
J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 174)


F. Trocase, L'Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris
"The Jewish Press of Vienna sold everything, put everything at a
price, artistic fame as well as success in business. No intellectual
production, no work of art has been able to see the light of day and
reach public notice, without passing by the crucible of the Jewish
Press, without having to submit to its criticism or to pay for its
approval. If an artist should wish to obtain the approbation of the
public, he must of necessity bow before the all powerful Jewish
journals. If a young actress, a musician, a singer of talent should
wish to make her first appearance and to venture before a more of less
numerous audience, she has in most cases not dared to do so, unless
after paying tribute to the desires of the Jews. Otherwise she would
experience certain failure. It was despotic tyranny re-established,
this time for the profit of the Jews and brutally exercised by them in
all its plentitude.
Such as it is revealed by its results, the Viennese Press dominated by
Judaism, has been absolutely disastrous. It is a work of death which
it has accomplished. Around it and outside it all is void. In all the
classes of the population are the germs of hatred, the seeds, of
discord and of jealously, dissolution and decomposition." (F. Trocase,
L'Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris; The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 175-176)

N.H. Webster, London, 1924
"When I first began to write on Revolution a well known London
Publisher said to me; 'Remember that if you take an anti-revolutionary
line you will have the whole literary world against you.' This
appeared to me extraordinary. Why should the literary world sympathize
with a movement which, from the French revolution onwards, has always
been directed against literature, art, and science, and has openly
proclaimed its aim to exalt the manual workers over the
intelligentsia? 'Writers must be proscribed as the most dangerous
enemies of the people' said Robespierre; his colleague Dumas said all
clever men should be guillotined. The system of persecutions against
men of talents was organized...they cried out in the Sections (of
Paris) 'Beware of that man for he has written a book.' Precisely the
same policy has been followed in Russia under moderate socialism in
Germany the professors, not the 'people,' are starving in garrets. Yet
the whole Press of our country is permeated with subversive
influences. Not merely in partisan works, but in manuals of history or
literature for use in schools, Burke is reproached for warning us
against the French Revolution and Carlyle's panegyric is applauded.
And whilst every slip on the part of an anti-revolutionary writer is
seized on by the critics and held up as an example of the whole, the
most glaring errors not only of conclusions but of facts pass
unchallenged if they happen to be committed by a partisan of the
movement. The principle laid down by Collot d'Herbois still holds
good: 'Tout est permis pour quiconque agit dans le sens de la
revolution.'
All this was unknown to me when I first embarked on my work. I knew
that French writers of the past had distorted facts to suit their own
political views, that conspiracy of history is still directed by
certain influences in the Masonic lodges and the Sorbonne [The
facilities of literature and science of the University of Paris]; I
did not know that this conspiracy was being carried on in this
country. Therefore the publisher's warning did not daunt me. If I was
wrong either in my conclusions or facts I was prepared to be
challenged. Should not years of laborious historical research meet
either with recognition or with reasoned and scholarly refutation?
But although my book received a great many generous appreciative
reviews in the Press, criticisms which were hostile took a form which
I had never anticipated. Not a single honest attempt was made to
refute either my French Revolution or World Revolution by the usual
methods of controversy; Statements founded on documentary evidence
were met with flat contradiction unsupported by a shred of counter
evidence. In general the plan adopted was not to disprove, but to
discredit by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me
views I had never expressed, or even by means of offensive
personalities. It will surely be admitted that this method of attack
is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy." (N.H.
Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, London, 1924,
Preface; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De
Poncins, pp. 179-180)


International Jew, by Henry Ford, 1922
"It is rather surprising is it not? That which ever way you turn to
trace the harmful streams of influence that flow through society, you
come upon a group of Jews. In sports corruption, a group of Jews. In
exploiting finance, a group of Jews. In theatrical degeneracy, a group
of Jews. In liquor propaganda, a group of Jews. Absolutely dominating
the wireless communications of the world, a group of Jews. The menace
of the movies, a group of Jews. In control of the press through
business and financial pressure, a group of Jews. War profiteers, 80
percent of them, Jews. The mezmia of so-called popular music, which
combines weak mindedness, with every suggestion of lewdness, Jews.
Organizations of anti-Christian laws and customs, again Jews. It is
time to show that the cry of bigot is raised mostly by bigots. There
is a religious prejudice in this country; there is, indeed, a
religious persecution, there is a forcible shoving aside of the
religious liberties of the majority of the people. And this prejudice
and persecution and use of force, is Jewish and nothing but Jewish.
If it is anti-Semitism to say that Communism in the United States is
Jewish, so be it. But to the unprejudiced mind it will look very much
like Americanism. Communism all over the world and not only in Russia
is Jewish." (International Jew, by Henry Ford, 1922)


The Patriot (London) November 9, 1939
"There is, however, no real evidence that the Soviet Government has
changed its policy of communism under control of the Bolsheviks, or
has loosened its control of communism in other countries, or has
ceased to be under Jew control. Unwanted tools certainly have been
'liquidated' in Russia by Stalin in his determination to be the
supreme head, and it is not unnatural that some Jews, When all the
leading positions were held by them, have suffered in the process of
rival elimination. Outside Russia, events in Poland show how the
Comintern still works. The Polish Ukraine has been communized under
Jewish commissars, with property owners either shot or marched into
Russia as slaves, with all estates confiscated and all business and
property taken over by the State. It has been said in the American
Jewish Press that the Bolshevik advance into the Ukraine was to save
the Jews there from meeting the fate of their co-religionists in
Germany, but this same Press is silent as to the fate meted out to the
Christian Poles.
In less than a month, in any case, the lie has been given to Molotov's
non-interference statement. Should international communism ever
complete its plan of bringing civilization to naught, it is
conceivable that some form of World Government in the hands of a few
men could emerge, which would not be communism. It would be the
domination of barbarous tyrants over the world of slaves, and
communism would have been used as the means to an end." (The Patriot
(London) November 9, 1939; The Rulers of Russia, Denis Fahey, pp.
23-24)


G.K.'s Weekly, February 4, 1937, Hilaire Belloc
"As for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary
Bolshevist movement is Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must
be a man who is taken in by the suppressions of our deplorable Press."
(G.K.'s Weekly, February 4, 1937, Hilaire Belloc)


Charles Sarolea, Belgian Consul
"I am quite ready to admit that the Jewish leaders are only a
proportionately infinitesimal fraction, even as the British rulers of
India are an infinitesimal fraction. But it is none the less true that
those few Jewish leaders are the masters of Russia, even as the
fifteen hundred Anglo-Indian Civil Servants are the masters of India.
For any traveler in Russia to deny such a truth would be to deny the
evidence of our own senses. When you find that out of a large number
of important Foreign Office officials whom you have met, all but two
are Jews, you are entitled to say that the Jews are running the
Russian Foreign Office." (The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern
World, a passage quoted from Impressions of Soviet Russia, by Charles
Sarolea, Belgian Consul in Edinburgh and Professor of French
Literature in the University of Edinburgh, pp. 93-94; The Rulers of
Russia, Denis Fahey, pp. 31-32)

All These Things, A.N. Field
"The reader may wonder why newspapers never mention that Bolshevism is
simply a Jewish conquest of Russia. The explanation is that the
international news agencies on which papers rely for foreign news are
controlled by Jews. The Jew, Jagoda, is head of the G.P.U. (the former
Cheka), now called 'The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs.'
The life, death or imprisonment of Russian citizens is in the hands of
this Jew, and his spies are everywhere. According to the
anti-Comintern bulletin (15/4/35) Jagoda's organization between 1929
and 1934 drove between five and six million Russian peasants from
their homes. (The Government of France now (July, 1936) has as Prime
Minister, the Jewish Socialist, Leon Blum. According to the French
journal Candide, M. Blum has substantial interests in Weiler's Jupiter
aero-engine works in France, and his son, Robert Blum, is manager of a
branch Weiler works in Russia, making Jupiter aero-engines for the
Russian Government)." (All These Things, A.N. Field; The Rulers of
Russia, Denis Fahey, p. 37)


The Cause of World Unrest (1920), Gerard Shelley
"Marxism, on which Bolshevism is founded, really did not express the
political side of the Russian character and the Bolsheviks were not
sincere Socialists or Communists, but Jews, working for the ulterior
motives of Judaism. Lev Cherny divided these Jews into three main
classes, firstly, financial Jews, who dabbled in muddy international
waters; secondly, Zionists, whose aims are, of course, well known;
and, thirdly, the Bolsheviks, including the Jewish Bund. The creed of
these Bolsheviks, according to the lecturer, is, briefly, that the
proletariat of all countries are nothing but gelatinous masses, which,
if the Intelligentsia were destroyed in each country, would leave
these masses at the mercy of the Jews." (The Cause of World Unrest
(1920), Gerard Shelley, pp. 136-137; The Rulers of Russia, Denis
Fahey, p.  37-38).

N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 342
"We have only to look around us in the world today, to see everywhere
the same disintegrating power at work, in art, literature, the drama,
the daily Press, in every sphere that can influence the mind of the
public...our modern cinemas perpetually endeavor to stir up class
hatred by scenes and phrases showing 'the injustice of Kings,' 'the
sufferings of the people,' 'the Selfishness of Aristocrats,'
regardless of whether these enter into the theme of the narrative or
not. And in the realms of literature, not merely in works of fiction
but in manuals for schools, in histories and books professing to be of
serious educative value and receiving a skillfully organized boom
throughout the press, everything is done to weaken patriotism, to
shake belief in all existing institutions by the systematic perversion
of both contemporary and historical facts. I do not believe that all
this is accidental; I do not believe that the public asks for the
anti-patriotic to demoralizing books and plays placed before it; on
the contrary it invariably responds to an appeal to patriotism and
simple healthy emotions. The heart of the people is still sound, but
ceaseless efforts are made to corrupt it." (N.H. Webster, Secret
Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 342; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 180-181)


Marcus Eli Ravage in Century Magazine, 1928
"You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why...Not
so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and
commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around
that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...
We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by
nature and tradition, and we are the Arch-Plotters of Universal Wars
and the Chief Beneficiaries of those wars. We are at once the founders
and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the
rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for
versatility!...
You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit
the charge. What of it?...You make much noise and fury about undue
Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good;
granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to
our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and your
government, and the very thoughts you think every day?...'The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring
on the late World War. You believe that book. All right...we will
underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is
that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have
carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the
courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant
for anybody to read?
If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not
direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it
wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish
financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as
well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole
civilization...
You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are
intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your
ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. We {Jews} have
been at the bottom of not merely of the latest war {WWI} but of nearly
all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major
revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and
frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it.
No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it...Who knows what
great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you
alone.
But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down
the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the
whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours
ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the
irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...
Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the
American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea
of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long
way off. We still dominate you...
Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress.
We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien
faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at
cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly
ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to
accept in full...We have merely divided your soul, confused your
impulses, paralyzed your desires...
So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should
probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make
no bones about telling you why...You Christians worry and complain
about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an
international people, a compact minority in your midst, with
traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your
own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your
orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see
the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it
seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed
creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is
certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you
appear to realize...
That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about
your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about
whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and
the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we
did when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then
you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion
picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles,
we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our
crimes...
You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. It is the
truth, and I cower at your discovery...We undoubtedly had a sizable
finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were
the prime movers in the Bourgeois Democratic Revolutions of the
century before last, both in France and America. If we were not, we
did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th
Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities.
They benefited us...You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite
as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder
that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as
long as they did not resort to violence?" (Marcus Eli Ravage (Big
Destruction Hammer of God), member of the staff of the New York
Tribune, "A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine,
January-February, 1928).

John Swinton, Former Chief of The New York Times
"We know the powers that are defying the people...Our Government is in
the hands of pirates. All the power of politics, and of Congress, and
of the administration is under the control of the moneyed
interests...The adversary has the force of capital, thousands of
millions of which are in his hand...He will grasp the knife of law,
which he has so often wielded in his interest. He will lay hold of his
forces in the legislature. He will make use of his forces in the
press, which are always waiting for the wink, which is as good as a
nod to a blind horse... Political rings are managed by skillful and
unscrupulous political gamblers, who possess the 'machine' by which
the populace are at once controlled and crushed." (John Swinton,
Former Chief of The New York Times, in his book, A Momentous Question:
The Respective Attitudes of Labor and Capital)

CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate.
"The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest.
They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the
spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a
national and patriotic duty - not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to
get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let
ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of
these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical
and holy to react against them." (New York Herald Tribune, August 17,
1937)


http://www.ihr.org/      http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

In article , mars1933
@hotmail.com says...
> Report of Former Vice President Spiro Agnew
>
> 
> Charles A. Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941
>
> 
> 

>>> Snipped a lot of jew hatin BS.....

Boy, you really can pick the winners to post quotes from, can't you?

BDK

Topaz wrote:
> 
> Report of Former Vice President Spiro Agnew
> "The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish
--------------------------
He was the criminal Nazi who mistakenly was permitted, for a time,
to assume the vice presidency, under, you guessed it, Richard 
Milhouse Nixon, until he was convicted of corruption and jailed.
Steve

George Bernard Shaw:

  When I said the Herr Hitler's action was right and inevitable, the
storm of abuse that was about to bust on me was suddenly checked by
Mr. Lloyd George saying exactly the same thing. It is inconceivable
that a single vote should be cast against him."

David Lloyd George, Daily Express 17.9.1936:

 I have never met a happier people than the Germans and Hitler is one
of the greatest men. The old trust him; the young idolize him. It is
the worship of a national hero who has saved his country.

Hans Grimm:

 I witness with awe and admiration, that he, as nearly the first in
the world, caused multitudes without force or any personal benefits to
follow him of their own free will and volition.

The Observer, John L. Garvin:

 I have talked to the humblest type of laborers, with merchants,
professional men. I have yet to discover a single dissenting voice to
the question of loyalty to the Fuehrer.

John F Kennedy, U.S President, Prelude to Leadership, The European
Diary of JF Kennedy, Summer, 1945:

After visiting these two places (the town of Berchtesgaden and
Odersalzberg) you can easily understand how that within a few years
Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of
the most significant figures who ever lived. He had in him the stuff
of which legends are made.





http://www.ihr.org/      http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.

       Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":

       "It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."

        "the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."

       The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner.
On studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:

"When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."

        Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media
and Rule America"
It may be rather out of date but it still explains why things are the
way they are.

       "American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Columbia Broadcasting
System (CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these
three has been under the absolute control of a single man over a long
enough period of time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff
the corporation at every level with officers of his choosing and then
to place his imprint indelibly upon it. In each case that man has been
a Jew. 
       "Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities
Communications, Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief
executive officer (CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a
Jew...In an interview in the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek,
Goldenson boasted 'I built this company (ABC) from scratch.'"

       "CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than
half a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."

      "There has been no move by top G-E management to change the
Jewish "profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personnel. To the
contrary, new Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve
Friedman..."

     "The man in charge of  the television entertainment division at
CBS is Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two
men....nearly all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of
reality, of good and evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior
are Jews. In particular, Sagansky and Bloomberg are Jews. So is
Tartikoff. Littlefield is the only Gentile who has had a significant
role in TV entertainment programming in recent years."

      "American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment
companies and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross,
Jew) Walt Disney Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top
entertainment CEOs listed above, eight are Jews." 

      "The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a
lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also
illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of
opinion... The Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several
large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the
Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's
largest trade  book publishing conglomerate,  Random House, with all
its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television
broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the
countries largest cable networks- the Sunday supplement Parade, with a
circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen
major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,
Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self,
Home&Garden...."

     "Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership
and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."

      "the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines
for nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and
what isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the
news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in
Jewish hands...The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York
Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's
and Family Circle..."

     "New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the
Daily News. The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish
real-estate developer Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal
property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of..."

     "There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO
of Time Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.    
       "Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington
Post Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
      "U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real
estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman..."

      " The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon &
Schuster , and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled
by Jews...The CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the
president is Jeremy Kaplan; both are Jews too."

 "Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of children's
books, with more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO
is Richard Bernstein, a Jew."

     "Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted
Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."

     "We are doing more than  merely giving them a decisive influence
on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also
are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children..."



http://www.ihr.org/      http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Topaz wrote:
> 
> George Bernard Shaw:
> 
>   When I said the Herr Hitler's action was right
----------------------
You posted another Nazi Lie!
Steve

Topaz wrote:
> 
>          There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
> Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
> Hollywood.
--------------
More stupid Nazi Lies.
Steve

It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they were not
liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the Jews
controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from Mein
Kampf:

"The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish
Press is not a staunch German and not a true National Socialist. The
best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his character and
strength of will, can be measured is by the hostility which his name
arouses among the mortal enemies of our people. 
"The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation, must be
reminded again and again of the fact that, through the medium of his
newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if he tells
the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some
greater deceit, which turns the apparent truth into a deliberate
falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood and
duplicity are the weapons with which he fights.
"Every calumny and falsehood published by the Jews are tokens of honor
which can be worn by our comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest
to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best friend.
"If a comrade of ours opens a Jewish newspaper in the morning and does
not find himself vilified there, then he has spent yesterday to no
account. For if he had achieved something he would be persecuted,
slandered, derided and abused. Those who effectively combat this
mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the enemy of all
Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse opposition on
the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks.
"When these truths become part of the flesh and blood, as it were, of
our members, then the movement will be impregnable and invincible."

" Then I began to examine my favorite 'World Press', with that fact
before my mind.   "The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my
respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became
still more repellant and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely
shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts
and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more
falsehood than truth. The writers  were- Jews.
"Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed to me
now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand things which
I  had formerly looked at in a different light."

"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."


http://www.ihr.org/      http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Crusading 1990s paper was mercilessly attacked -- and destroyed --
when it led one crusade into forbidden territory; a personal story.by
Jack Killey

QUESTION: Do you really believe the Jews own the media?

Answer: Most of it, yes. But they don't have to own it to control it.

An object lesson in this distinction was the downfall of northeastern
Ohio's The Gateway Press, a general interest newsweekly to which I
devoted seven years of part-time work. A fierce smear campaign and
unremitting advertising boycott by Cleveland-area Jews -- many not
even in our circulation region -- caused the forced sale of a
newspaper that many readers trusted to deliver at least an
approximation of the truth about events in their communities...

But only 850 words on Clinton's appointments reduced our county, after
twelve years of an alternative, to its former bland diet of
one-newspaper pabulum. A barely measurable percentage of our
readership, none of whom ever refuted the commentary on its
particulars, managed to deprive some 48,000 readers of a reliable news
source in their communities. The Jews' "persecuted minority" mantle
is, I suppose, apropos for a race that showed a gift for the
theatrical long before they created Broadway and Hollywood...

The commentary in question was published, as all my many commentaries
were, as my personal opinion, not as the editorial position of the
newspaper. The piece can be easily synopsized. I pointed out the high
percentage of Jews among Clinton's appointees, hardly representative
of his stated goal to have an administration that "looks like
America." I wondered how this might affect American foreign policy
towards Israel, and (this was the part that brought in the big guns
against us) ventured the opinion that this facet of the Clinton
administration was being deliberately obscured by a Jewish-dominated
American media establishment.

You'd think I'd written a glowing reconsideration of Mein Kampf. My
editor's phone started jumping off her desk. Sales reps were screamed
at and thrown from premises by red-faced merchants who had previously
described us as an asset to the community. One of the more prominent
Jewish businessmen in the area wrote the editor a venomous letter
(specifying, of course, that it was not for publication) telling her,
"You can't say whether or not you're an anti-Semite. Only we can
decide that."

Do you think the surrounding media establishment came to the defense
of one of their own embattled members as the pot began to boil beyond
the boundaries of Portage County, Ohio? Do you suppose that perhaps
they'd defend the First Amendment right of a 12-year-old mainstream
newspaper to publish controversial opinion articles? Think again.

It took the Newhouse-owned Cleveland Plain Dealer about ten working
days to run a lead editorial titled "One For the Fish," written by
Plain Dealer staffer Carolyn Davis, a Jewess who in a personal whine
piece once stated her wish that every gun be wiped off the face of the
Earth (no liberal bias here). Carolyn was mad, and maybe a little
jealous that I could write circles around her. She at least quoted the
commentary's best sentence, which was that Clinton "seated enough
white European males to ensure that America will be ruined in a
competent, intelligent, and well-organized fashion." Otherwise it was
the stock denunciation of "anti-Semitic . . . crap," seething with
horrified disbelief that anyone could suggest that Jews control
America's media. Let's see, a Jewess writer for Ohio's largest - and
Jew-owned --newspaper attacks a rural Gentile-owned weekly in a lead
editorial . . . doesn't sound like control to me.

The Cleveland Jewish News was even more generous, allotting a full
page to editor Cynthia Dettelbach herself rather than an underling. An
equally unexceptional attack it was, bristling with weasel words and
broad smears, but contradicting none of the commentary's content with
opposing facts regarding Clinton's appointees. I imagine the Jewish
News, like most of the other Jewish organs in the country, ran
bannered praise of Clinton's favoritism towards Jews in his
administration. I guess it's only impolitic for Gentile publications
to notice it, another point I made in the commentary.

This sort of notice by large media organs goes beyond "coverage" of a
hot topic. Neither publication took any interest in the community
served by The Gateway and probably cared even less who we, the paper
covering it, were.

The Newhouse-owned Akron Beacon Journal ran no editorial hate pieces,
but they stayed on top of the unfolding events around that
"anti-Semitic" newspaper in Streetsboro. The Plain Dealer nominally
covered our county, but we beat them regularly in an area they usually
assigned to worn-out hacks in their Summit County bureau. The point
is, the sudden interest and overbearing coverage of a heretofore
unnoticed region of their circulation area was looking mighty
selective. We had touched on a topic that was . . . unpermitted. A
Jewish topic. And they were going to make sure that the publication
impertinent enough to raise the thorny issue of Jewish power in the
American oval office and the American media wouldn't publish for long.

The point man in the effort -- the visible one, anyway -- was Jerry
Brodsky, a Jewish principal in the largest and most affluent public
school district in our county. His most recent claim to fame had been
his opposition to the display of a Christmas tree at the predominantly
Gentile school he governed.

Also an attorney and a resident of Beachwood, a heavily-Jewish and
affluent Cleveland bedroom suburb, "Jerry the Jew," as he became
less-than-affectionately known in the Gateway office, mounted a
secondary advertising boycott against us, sending high-minded letters
to many of our advertisers warning them of the business to be lost if
they continued to advertise with us. He wrote the letters under his
legal letterhead, though he took care to remind recipients this wasn't
official business (although he did remind them of his important
position in the school district).

I don't think Jerry the Jew really scared anyone off, but he kept up
the momentum; the big advertisers who dropped us did so on their own
hoof. Jewish Rite Aid CEO Alex Grass suddenly took a personal interest
in the ad account of his rundown shop fifteen miles from us and pulled
their ads, declaring his offense at the article in a letter to us; Jew
Albert Klaben of Klaben Auto Stores, one of the region's
biggest-volume auto-supply chains, was equally miffed and yanked his
ads. Both were important accounts. Several smaller but regular
advertisers pulled one by one, and a large Cleveland-area grocery
chain, Gentile-owned but with stores in heavily Jewish Cleveland
suburbs, began shuffling their feet and "reconsidering" their account
in phone calls and letters to my editor. Nervous local Gentile bankers
and realtors called with weak offers of continuing support, but whined
about all the "bad publicity" we were getting...

  I thought back to a mysterious anonymous caller, a not-unfriendly
and apparently Gentile woman with a patrician accent who contacted me
early in the fray. She calmly told me the history of "the boycott,"
meaning not the current one against us but the
historical prototype of it, and said, "Your paper will be out of
business in eighteen months." It took, I think, fourteen.

What I found significant throughout this process was the outsized
influence wielded by a small clique, and a clique who would normally
have had no special interest in our paper or in our region, which is
largely rural and probably 99 percent Gentile. Even had a genuine
boycott been carried out its effect would have been negligible. Bad
publicity seems to have been the boycott's purpose; since the largest
advertisers who pulled were Jews, a phone call to them from Brodsky or
the Jewish News or the Cleveland ADL probably would have sufficed.

Another feature of the boycott that struck me was the powerlessness of
our Gentile readers, many of whom were outraged by the attack on us.
We weren't lacking in support from our readership, some of whom were
courageous enough to register their agreement with the commentary in
our letters column. I found encouraging the number of readers who told
me privately their feelings on Jewish power in U.S. politics.
Unfortunately, they didn't wield the power the Jews do among U.S.
merchandisers, bankers, car dealers, and realtors, the people whose ad
dollars support small (and large) newspapers. It shouldn't have
surprised me.

I had to laugh at Carloyn Davis's description of "Jewish media power"
in the Plain Dealer editorial as a "bigoted buzz phrase that goes back
decades." One doesn't have to sample overtly "racist" writings to
encounter references to Jewish media control, and they date back much
farther than decades. When I see past allusions to Jewish press power
from the pens of such august and "establishment" figures as historian
W.E.H. Lecky, Winston Churchill, Hillaire Belloc, or Sir Richard
Burton (among many others), two things cross my mind.

One is the casual manner of its mention, as though these writers are
noting that the sky is blue. Lecky, for example, in his late
nineteenth-century masterpiece "Democracy and Liberty," devotes a
paragraph or two to Jewish domination of the Russian press under the
Czars (he attributes at least some of the resentment the average
Russian felt for the Jews during the pogroms to this influence). No
earnest attempt is made to convince the reader of a doubtful precept,
no long lists of proofs are proffered: not because they couldn't be
produced, one senses, but because it simply isn't necessary to
document what appears to have been a commonly-known fact among the
less-numerous, but better-informed, literate members of earlier
generations.

A more troubling thought that strikes me about this situation is that
contemporary authors of comparative standing could not publish similar
observations, or at least not without sudden relegation to vanity
presses and maybe community college jobs. Probably only the eminence
and the solid corpus of work produced by earlier authors, and perhaps
less fear among Gentile publishers, allowed them to make such
references without destroying their careers.

At any rate, Jewish press control is hardly a malicious myth that's
been propagated for decades (centuries?) by anti-Semites; it is rather
a truth that has been relentlessly obscured by increasingly powerful
Jewish interests within and outside the press. No one who has closely
studied the pertinent history at any length can convincingly argue
otherwise, even if the student limits himself to "permitted" books and
authors rather than documents some find inherently questionable (i.e.,
the Protocols. ) The extent to which an offending author is pushed to
the margins or isolated from the public by a self-interested Jewish
minority probably depends on a variety of factors, but one thing is
certain: he won't emerge from the process quite intact.

So what has this to do with the experiences of a small-time writer for
a little newspaper in Streetsboro, Ohio? Only that I saw firsthand
what happens and has happened to many writers who dare to write and
publish on the fact of Jewish media and political influence. It was in
one sense a privilege to be in courageous company living and dead: to
be allocated the ire bestowed on people like Hillaire Belloc, G. K.
Chesterton, William Pierce, Douglas Reed, and Wilmot Robertson was a
badge of honor of sorts.

In other senses, not least the sacrifice of a good newspaper on the
altar of Jewish sensibilities, it was a tragedy. But not for me.
Although it's virtually certain that despite fifteen years of some
pretty good journalism on my part, I'll never work again for a
"respectable" journal, given the litmus tests and the rules imposed by
such publications, who would want to? If anything my experience in
fifteen years in the field has been one of progressive distaste for
the media, and in that sentiment at least I join a growing number of
Americans.

Unfortunately, most readers and television viewers will probably
continue to be guided by a thirst for entertainment and stimulation
despite their stated disgust for the mainstream media. But there's no
doubt that awareness of the true nature and agenda of America's
"mainstream," i.e., Jewish, media is growing, and perhaps we can take
a page from the Chosen Ones themselves when it comes to the
retribution a committed and aligned minority can impose.

2005 NationalVanguard.org.


http://www.ihr.org/      http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org     http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html