|
|
|
date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:09:15 -0500,
group: uk.politics.electoral
back
Re: Local Authority By-Election Results 24 September 2009
In article ,
JN@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
> rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> > In article ,
> > T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote:
> >
> >> Paul Hyett wrote:
> >>
> >>>> North Tyneside MBC, Preston
> >>>> Con 1141 (55.8; -14.2)
> >>>> Lab 503 (24.6; -5.3)
> >>>> Public Services not Private Profit 174 (8.5; +8.5)
> >>>> LD 152 (7.4; +7.4)
> >>>> Green 73 (3.6; +3.6)
> >>>> Majority 638
> >>>> Turnout not known
> >>>> Con hold
> >>>> Percentage change is since May 2008
> >>> The Tories hold a seat on Tyneside??
> >> The Conservatives have the majority of councillors on North
> >> Tyneside and also hold the directly elected Mayor.
> >>
> >>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Tyneside_Council_election,_2008
> >>
> >> However since the media only focus on the big name city councils
> >> they perpetuate this rubbish that the Conservatives have no support
> >> in northern urban areas.
> > That will be because what little strength they have is in
> > suburban areas, maybe?
>
> Well, it probably isn't very strong on inner-city council estates,
> if that's what you mean.
>
> And in cities where councils carpeted their inner areas (and even
> some of their peripheral suburbs) with council flats in the
> fifties, sixties and seventies, that's going to have an effect
> which is obvious to anyone looking at the issue dispassionately.
>
> Council- and housing-association housing is a political and
> psephological issue. It doesn't just happen by accident.
You overlook that Tynemouth, a major component of North Tyneside, is
another fading Northern seaside resort, not a major city.
--
Cllr. Colin Rosenstiel
Cambridge http://www.rosenstiel.co.uk/
Cambridge Liberal Democrats: http://www.cambridgelibdems.org.uk/
date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:09:15 -0500
author: unknown
|
Re: Local Authority By-Election Results 24 September 2009
rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> JN@noparticularplacetogo.com (JNugent) wrote:
>> rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
>>> T.C.Roll-Pickering@qmul.ac.uk (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote:
>>>> Paul Hyett wrote:
>>>>>> North Tyneside MBC, Preston
>>>>>> Con 1141 (55.8; -14.2)
>>>>>> Lab 503 (24.6; -5.3)
>>>>>> Public Services not Private Profit 174 (8.5; +8.5)
>>>>>> LD 152 (7.4; +7.4)
>>>>>> Green 73 (3.6; +3.6)
>>>>>> Majority 638
>>>>>> Turnout not known
>>>>>> Con hold
>>>>>> Percentage change is since May 2008
>>>>> The Tories hold a seat on Tyneside??
>>>> The Conservatives have the majority of councillors on North
>>>> Tyneside and also hold the directly elected Mayor.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Tyneside_Council_election,_2008
>>>> However since the media only focus on the big name city councils
>>>> they perpetuate this rubbish that the Conservatives have no support
>>>> in northern urban areas.
>>> That will be because what little strength they have is in
>>> suburban areas, maybe?
>> Well, it probably isn't very strong on inner-city council estates,
>> if that's what you mean.
>> And in cities where councils carpeted their inner areas (and even
>> some of their peripheral suburbs) with council flats in the
>> fifties, sixties and seventies, that's going to have an effect
>> which is obvious to anyone looking at the issue dispassionately.
>> Council- and housing-association housing is a political and
>> psephological issue. It doesn't just happen by accident.
> You overlook that Tynemouth, a major component of North Tyneside, is
> another fading Northern seaside resort, not a major city.
What are you talking about?
I haven't mentioned Tynemouth and have said nothing about it.
Do you have anything to say about what I *did* write, as opposed to what I
didn't write?
date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:01:35 +0100
author: JNugent
|
|
|