Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:16:37 -0500,    group: uk.politics.electoral        back       
Re: Local Authority Byelection Results 3 September 2009   
In article , john@acornusers.org (John M 
Ward) wrote:

> There is a real message that has come out of this by-election, and it is
> that no Labour seat is now "safe".

I suspect that is pretty universal. There is no ward in Cambridge that 
they haven't lost at least once since the new boundaries were introduced 
in 2004. The puzzle is why it was the two where their only active 
opponents were the Tories that they didn't lose in June this year. And no 
internal Labour splits or byelections to help them on the downwards slope 
here either.

Now for the more difficult question: Why are Labour doing clearly better 
than in 2003 in a short list of larger towns and cities? Examples are 
Leicester, Luton and Lambeth to take three alliterative examples.

-- 
Cllr. Colin Rosenstiel
Cambridge                    http://www.rosenstiel.co.uk/
Cambridge Liberal Democrats: http://www.cambridgelibdems.org.uk/
date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:16:37 -0500   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us