Re: Norwich North By-Election
In article ,
dnorth@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk (David North) wrote:
> "John M Ward" wrote in message
> news:507fef405fjohn@acornusers.org...
> > this was a stupendous result with a 16.5% swing to the Conservatives,
> > despite what Gordon Brown tried to claim.
>
> This is a good example of how misleading the usual measure of swing
> can be. The Labour share of the vote fell by 26.7%, but the
> Conservative increase was only 6.29%, so to claim a 16.5% swing to
> the Conservatives is patent nonsense. Both UKIP (up 9.45%) and the
> Green Party (up 7.08%) gained more than the Conservatives did.
> While the fall in the Labour vote was spectacular, the Conservative
> gain was rather paltry as by-elections go.
The odd thing is that the UKIP and Green performances look rather
different from that and from each other beside their Euro-election votes
of 25% and 12% across the whole of Norwich and 9.5% and 22% across
Broadland.
--
Cllr. Colin Rosenstiel
Cambridge http://www.rosenstiel.co.uk/
Cambridge Liberal Democrats: http://www.cambridgelibdems.org.uk/
date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:16:53 -0500
author: unknown
|