Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:16:53 -0500,    group: uk.politics.electoral        back       
Re: Norwich North By-Election   
In article , 
dnorth@abbeymanor.fsbusiness.co.uk (David North) wrote:

> "John M Ward"  wrote in message 
> news:507fef405fjohn@acornusers.org...
> > this was a stupendous result with a 16.5% swing to the Conservatives,
> > despite what Gordon Brown tried to claim.
> 
> This is a good example of how misleading the usual measure of swing 
> can be. The Labour share of the vote fell by 26.7%, but the 
> Conservative increase was only 6.29%, so to claim a 16.5% swing to 
> the Conservatives is patent nonsense. Both UKIP (up 9.45%) and the 
> Green Party (up 7.08%) gained more than the Conservatives did. 
> While the fall in the Labour vote was spectacular, the Conservative 
> gain was rather paltry as by-elections go.

The odd thing is that the UKIP and Green performances look rather 
different from that and from each other beside their Euro-election votes 
of 25% and 12% across the whole of Norwich and 9.5% and 22% across 
Broadland.

-- 
Cllr. Colin Rosenstiel
Cambridge                    http://www.rosenstiel.co.uk/
Cambridge Liberal Democrats: http://www.cambridgelibdems.org.uk/
date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:16:53 -0500   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us