|
|
|
date: 11 Jun 2009 09:49:48 GMT,
group: uk.politics.drugs
back
Re: Supermarket staff stab customer to death for complaining
Aidy wrote:
> "Ollie Clark" wrote in message
> news:slrnh2vlf2.hfl.usenet@greedy.zen175545...
>> Yep. Used a flawed analogy and then when someone called you on it just
>> paraphrased what they said to you.
>
> Not at all. If the original "calling out" had any weight to it at all then
> my reply must surely carry exactly as much weight as it had the exact same
> wording?
No.
Your understanding of electricity is flawed. Everyone else who has
commented agrees that your understanding is flawed. You repeating
that your words carry as much weight as mine when everyone else knows
you are wrong just makes you look stupid.
If you want to know why you're wrong, read a basic text book on
electricity. I'm not here to teach you what you should have learned
in GCSE science.
If it were a debatable point, I'd provide some evidence. If someone says
that 2+2=5 I'll just tell them they're wrong.
date: 11 Jun 2009 09:49:48 GMT
author: Ollie Clark
|
Re: Supermarket staff stab customer to death for complaining
In article ,
Aidy wrote:
>Listen to yourself...you're splitting hairs about how electricity works FFS
>lol!
Splitting hairs? Your electrical analogy was fundamentally flawed.
Francis
date: 11 Jun 2009 13:03:57 GMT
author: (Francis Burton)
|
Re: Supermarket staff stab customer to death for complaining
"Francis Burton" wrote in message
news:1244725436.975599@irys.nyx.net...
> In article ,
> Aidy wrote:
>>Listen to yourself...you're splitting hairs about how electricity works
>>FFS
>>lol!
>
> Splitting hairs? Your electrical analogy was fundamentally flawed.
It was actually quite appropriate if you think about it :) Had this have
been a newsgroup on physics I may have chosen my wording better, but it
isn't. It was an analogy yet why is everyone jumping on the minutea of the
words used? Does the fact that I didn't give a chapter and verse technical
explanation of electricity mean that my point about crime is invalid? Or
are people just trying to muddy the waters to draw attention from their own
flawed arguments.
Only on the internet can people be so pathetic.
date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:24:13 +0100
author: Aidy
|
Re: Supermarket staff stab customer to death for complaining
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:04:36 +0100, "Aidy"
wrote:
>
>"Ollie Clark" wrote in message
>news:slrnh34hsg.stq.usenet@greedy.zen175545...
>> Bored of you now.
>Cos you can't go on and on and on about how electricity works? Like it has
>anything to do with anything?
You thought how electricity works had something to do with it, you
silly twat.
It should be more than obvious to everyone now that you are abysmally
stupid. Even if you are deliberatly trolling you are making a complete
cock up of it.
Svenne
date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:50:01 GMT
author: Svenne
|
Re: Supermarket staff stab customer to death for complaining
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:04:36 +0100, "Aidy"
wrote:
>
>"Ollie Clark" wrote in message
>news:slrnh34hsg.stq.usenet@greedy.zen175545...
>> Bored of you now.
>Cos you can't go on and on and on about how electricity works? Like it has
>anything to do with anything?
Poor Aidy, scored an own goal and now you're begging people not to go
"on and on and on about it."
That's the first time I've ever seen a troll pleading for mercy.
Svenne
date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:04:13 GMT
author: Svenne
|
|
|
