Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: 10 Jun 2009 15:48:50 GMT,    group: uk.politics.drugs        back       
Re: Supermarket staff stab customer to death for complaining   
Aidy wrote:
>> Aidy wrote:
>
>> You really don't understand electricity. I suggest you come up with a
>> different analogy that you understand so as to not make yourself look
>> more stupid than you already do. Either that or get a GCSE student to
>> explain it to you.
>
> You really don't understand electricity. I suggest you come up with a 
> different retort so as to not make yourself look more stupid than you 
> already do. Either that or get a GCSE student to explain it to you.
>
> Do you see what I did there?

Yep. Used a flawed analogy and then when someone called you on it just 
paraphrased what they said to you.

If you understand electricity, why are you lying about how it works?
date: 10 Jun 2009 15:48:50 GMT   author:   Ollie Clark

Re: Supermarket staff stab customer to death for complaining   
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:34:08 +0100, "Aidy" 
wrote:

>
>"Ollie Clark"  wrote in message 
>news:slrnh34all.si3.usenet@greedy.zen175545...
>> It wasn't the wording that was the problem. You were completely wrong
>> about how electricity works.
>
>So?  Who cares?  Everyone understands the meaning of "electricity follows 
>the path of least resistance" to mean that certain paths are used more than 
>others.  It's not a scientificically accurate idiom, but people undertstand 
>its meaning.  If I said that "windows keep the cold out" everyone knows what 
>I mean despite it not being scientifically accurate.
>
>You're just being pedantic in an attempt to muddy the waters.  No-one here 
>cares how electricity works.
>
>> The analogy was wrong
>
>So?  Seriously....who cares?  No analogy is 100% accurate, but the 
>electricity one is commonly understood.
>
>> Can we forget about the electricity?
>
>You obviously can't because it's all you can talk about.  *My* understanding 
>of electricity is just fine.  It's not my fault that the theory of following 
>the path of least resistance is not 100% scientifically accurate.  I used it 
>to demonstrate a point using a commonly understood phrase, not to educate 
>you how the lights in your house work!  Get a life.

LMAO! It's fun watching you dig your hole ever deeper. Keep it up,
Aidy, there''s not many around like you. 

You're definitly the most incompetent troll on Usenet.

Svenne
date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:57:11 GMT   author:   Svenne

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us