Re: Supermarket staff stab customer to death for complaining
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:34:08 +0100, "Aidy"
wrote:
>
>"Ollie Clark" wrote in message
>news:slrnh34all.si3.usenet@greedy.zen175545...
>> It wasn't the wording that was the problem. You were completely wrong
>> about how electricity works.
>
>So? Who cares? Everyone understands the meaning of "electricity follows
>the path of least resistance" to mean that certain paths are used more than
>others. It's not a scientificically accurate idiom, but people undertstand
>its meaning. If I said that "windows keep the cold out" everyone knows what
>I mean despite it not being scientifically accurate.
>
>You're just being pedantic in an attempt to muddy the waters. No-one here
>cares how electricity works.
>
>> The analogy was wrong
>
>So? Seriously....who cares? No analogy is 100% accurate, but the
>electricity one is commonly understood.
>
>> Can we forget about the electricity?
>
>You obviously can't because it's all you can talk about. *My* understanding
>of electricity is just fine. It's not my fault that the theory of following
>the path of least resistance is not 100% scientifically accurate. I used it
>to demonstrate a point using a commonly understood phrase, not to educate
>you how the lights in your house work! Get a life.
LMAO! It's fun watching you dig your hole ever deeper. Keep it up,
Aidy, there''s not many around like you.
You're definitly the most incompetent troll on Usenet.
Svenne
date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:57:11 GMT
author: Svenne
|