Re: Cannabis needs Branding, not Banning!
In article ,
m_p@rocketmail.com (M_P) wrote:
> *From:* M_P
> *Date:* Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
>
> On Apr 30, 12:23 pm, Mel Rowing wrote:
> > On Apr 30, 4:56 pm, White Spirit wrote:
>
> > > I think that many regular drinkers also suffer
> > > mental health issues - certainly enough to cause them to drink
> > to excess
> > > on a frequent basis. The different between alcohol and
> > cannabis is that
> > > alcohol is known to cause antisocial and violent behaviour.
> >
> > That's not at all true!
> >
> > Alcohol is well known as a dis-inhibitor. There is an argument
> > that it
> > exposes personality traits that otherwise remain hidden become
> > exposed. Thus anyone with a predisposition towards antisocial
> > behaviour and/or violence is more likely to exibit these
> > tendancies
> > under the influence of alcohol. Otherwise why is it not the case
> > that
> > every drunk becomes violent?
> >
> > Of course a similar argument in relation cannabis. It may well be
> > that
> > those with a predisposition towards psychosis may well be more
> > likely
> > to be tipped over by prolonged or heavy cannabis use.
>
> Alcohol seems more likely than other drugs to draw out violent
> predispositions, judging from how well known the phenomenon of the
> 'mean drunk' is. How many people have first-hand experience, or even
> reliable second-or-greater-hand experience, with a psychotic stoner?
>
> > The big difference of course is that drunkeness is a relatively
> > temporary condititon.
>
> So is being under the influence of cannabis.
>
Er no. Cannabis changes the brain and so does alcohol. The effect of both may be
worse on the undeveloped immature brain and especially the foetus.
date: Sat, 3 May 2008 11:29 +0100 (BST)
author: (Claude)
|