Re: Brown warned that cannabis decision may face legal challenge
In article , drjohn@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com (Dr
John Watson) wrote:
> *From:* Dr John Watson
> *Date:* Thu, 01 May 2008 08:32:12 +0100
>
> Noticed at Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:13:00 +0100: Claude informed us:
>
> > Not /absolutely true/ or how could you explain the two day coma
> > of those
> > who have carried oil internally and it leaked?
>
> Do you have a link for this, please? It would be useful to me as an
> example of the non-toxic nature of cannabis. This leak must be
> equivalent
> to 1,000s of joints-worth of THC etc.
I thought you and I had discussed this before when you were using another name,
your real one! The first occasion I am aware of was in the very early 70s, way
before the internet. Hillingdon Hospital is where the two gentlemen were taken.
>
> I have also heard (although this sounds apocryphal) that somebody
> snorted
> LSD, thinking it was cocaine, and likewise spent several days in a
> coma
> with no long-term harm. A line of cocaine is around 250mg, a dose
> of LSD
> is 250ug (micrograms). This person ingested 1,000 doses of LSD.
>
> --
> Dr John Watson
> Baker Street
>
>
date: Sat, 3 May 2008 11:29 +0100 (BST)
author: (Claude)
|
Re: Brown warned that cannabis decision may face legal challenge
Noticed at Sat, 03 May 2008 11:29:00 +0100: Claude informed us:
> I thought you and I had discussed this before when you were using another name,
> your real one! The first occasion I am aware of was in the very early 70s, way
> before the internet. Hillingdon Hospital is where the two gentlemen were taken.
I don't recall ever discussing this with you. Thanks for the information,
I'll see if I can find it.
--
Dr John Watson
Baker Street
date: Sat, 03 May 2008 15:21:15 +0100
author: Dr John Watson
|