In article , drjohn@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com (Dr
John Watson) wrote:

> *From:* Dr John Watson 
> *Date:* Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:46:16 +0100
> 
> Your attacks on the ACMD are noted, and archived on Google groups.
Delighted. My views of the proceedings are freely available all over the web. My
views of the  behaviour of the Chairman are freely available. 
> 
> You really appear to hate the ACMD, don't you? Do you blame them in 
> some
> way for the 1999 events?
I most certainly do not hate the ACMD, there are now and have been over the years
some very worthy and very conscientious members. I object to the corruption of
their proceedings and really do wonder who is responsible. To put Simon Lenton on
twice was a bit of an own goal. Whoever IS responsible does not have much guile.
> 
> You do realise (although I doubt it) that if Brown ignores the 
> ACMD, he
> will be playing into our hands. This is exactly what 
> anti-prohibitionists
> want him to do.
You may well get your wish. Of course there may well be several dissenting members
of the ACMD who have written to him privately without the knowledge of the ACMD
Chairman, actually you could put money on it. 
> 
> 
> Protect our youth, save our children, STAMP OUT PROHIBITION.
> 
> http://www.dpft.org/images/Prohibition.jpg
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr John Watson
> Baker Street
> 
>

Noticed at Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:13:00 +0100: Claude informed us:

> In article ,
> drjohn@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com (Dr John Watson) wrote:
> 
>> *From:* Dr John Watson  *Date:* Tue, 29
>> Apr 2008 14:46:16 +0100
>> 
>> Your attacks on the ACMD are noted, and archived on Google groups.
> Delighted. My views of the proceedings are freely available all over the
> web. My views of the  behaviour of the Chairman are freely available.
>> 
>> You really appear to hate the ACMD, don't you? Do you blame them in
>> some
>> way for the 1999 events?
> I most certainly do not hate the ACMD, there are now and have been over
> the years some very worthy and very conscientious members. I object to
> the corruption of their proceedings and really do wonder who is
> responsible. To put Simon Lenton on twice was a bit of an own goal.
> Whoever IS responsible does not have much guile.
>> 
>> You do realise (although I doubt it) that if Brown ignores the ACMD, he
>> will be playing into our hands. This is exactly what
>> anti-prohibitionists
>> want him to do.
> You may well get your wish. Of course there may well be several
> dissenting members of the ACMD who have written to him privately without
> the knowledge of the ACMD Chairman, actually you could put money on it.

Of course, all the hints being dropped by Brown this week could just be
testing the waters in tomorrow's election. If he feels that
reclassification could backfire (meaning, to unelected Brown, that it
could cost him votes) he can still accept the ACMD's recommendation next
week, claiming he follows the advise of experts. There is considerable
criticism of him ignoring experts in the non-Daily Mail press.


>> Protect our youth, save our children, STAMP OUT PROHIBITION.
>> 
>> http://www.dpft.org/images/Prohibition.jpg
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Dr John Watson
>> Baker Street
>> 
>> 

-- 
Dr John Watson
Baker Street