|
|
|
date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:33 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
group: uk.politics.drugs
back
Re: EMCDDA 2007 Annual report on the state of the drugs problem in
In article
,
tvaerskaegg@aol.com () wrote:
> *From:* tvaerskaegg@aol.com
> *Date:* Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:21:01 -0800 (PST)
>
> On 24 Nov, 12:34, Cla...@aol.com (Claude) wrote:
> > In article ,
>
> > > Claude is working closely with the Swedish Hassela Educational
> > > Foundation, which speaks volumes about his credibility.
> >
> > > A "drug expert" working closely with Hassela is rather like a
> > > scientist working closely with the Flat Earth Society.
> >
> > > But really, prohibitionists are a bit like flat earthers
> > anyway, so
> > > we shouldn't be surprised.
>
> > > Svenne
>
> > Ad hominem, more than slightly pathetic surely. I gave a serious
> > answer
> > If you think there is something wrong about my analysis-debate
> > that
>
> I was merely pointing out the fact that you have worked closely with
> the Swedish Hassela Foundation, who are a bunch of demented nutters.
> It is a valid comparison to say that a "drug expert" working closely
> with Hassela is rather like a scientist working closely with the
> Flat
> Earth Society. That is not ad hominem, it is making a perfectly
> valid
> statement about his credibility.
>
> Svenne
>
>
It might be a) If you had any evidence that they were "demented nutters",
that in itself is an ad hominem. Deal with my analysis if you can.
Otherwise shut up.
date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:33 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
author: (Claude)
|
Re: EMCDDA 2007 Annual report on the state of the drugs problem in
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:33 +0000 (GMT Standard Time), Claude@aol.com
(Claude) wrote:
>> I was merely pointing out the fact that you have worked closely with
>> the Swedish Hassela Foundation, who are a bunch of demented nutters.
>> It is a valid comparison to say that a "drug expert" working closely
>> with Hassela is rather like a scientist working closely with the
>> Flat Earth Society. That is not ad hominem, it is making a perfectly
>> valid statement about his credibility.
>It might be a) If you had any evidence that they were "demented nutters",
>that in itself is an ad hominem. Deal with my analysis if you can.
>Otherwise shut up.
Hassela is a crazy brainwashing cult, as off their rocks as the
Scientologist Narconon.
You don't support Narconon, do you?
Svenne
date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 06:46:28 GMT
author: Svenne
|
|
|