|
|
|
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:30:35 +0100,
group: uk.politics.drugs
back
More super skunk
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:30:35 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
in Wales is 60% now?
60% of what?
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:14:50 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
On 12 jun, 22:14, name wrote:
> On 12 jun, 20:30, Phil Stovell wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> > --
> > Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
> "The amount of cannabis grown in Wales has risen from under 10% to 60%
> in 10 years, according to drugs consultant Liam Watson. "
>
> Huh? What is that supposed to mean that the amount of cannabis grown
> in Wales is 60% now?
> 60% of what?
Oh nevermind, judging from the context of the article it's 60% of the
cannabis used in Wales that is grown locally.
date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:28:58 -0700
author: name
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
high THC content.
A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
and do cause confusion.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
>
date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:07:32 GMT
author: Mark Whiteley
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On 13 Jun, 08:07, "Mark Whiteley"
wrote:
> "Phil Stovell" wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> This article trys to claim that this 'Skunk' is 6 times stronger than resin,
> which is impossible since resin is made from the trichomes which are of a
> high THC content.
>
> A good resin can easily have 20/30% THC content...
>
> Me thinks they are refering not to resin but to shite bar, this shows just
> how confused the press/media is about cannabis.
>
> It's lack of knowledge is actually dangerous as these lies they spread could
> and do cause confusion.
Which, if they gave a toss, _would_ be a problem.
date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:22:17 -0700
author: Jethro
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.12.18.30.33.214095@stovell.org.uk...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6742933.stm
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
"His mother Colette White said Matthew's personality started to change drastically the moment he
started smoking skunk at the age of 16. She said: "He didn't miss school, he completed his GCSEs, he
got fantastic results and we were so proud of him. "And it only took from then, about May or June,
until the October, for it all to unravel. All his previous ambition disappeared."
Can anyone say.... STRESSS???
There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC
didn't check this and avoid printing tabloid garbage.
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
|
Re: More super skunk
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
> There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> avoid printing tabloid garbage.
Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
schizophrenia to babies.
--
Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:04:50 +0100
author: Phil Stovell
|
Re: More super skunk
"Phil Stovell" wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.01.08.04.49.152682@stovell.org.uk...
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:14 +0200, 5trfg6h7 wrote:
>
> > There is no 'superskunk', and I'm surprised the BBC didn't check this and
> > avoid printing tabloid garbage.
>
> Unless you follow tabloid garbage, you're a legaliser and want to give
> schizophrenia to babies.
>
> --
> Phil Stovell, Hampshire, UK
And where are the crazed hash smokers, that is what I want to know.
I mean, this whole 'cannabis today is more dangerous because
it is stronger' is ridiculous in itself.
Let alone whether it is stronger today than back in the
sixties, when people were smoking "Acapulco Gold"
or "Maui Wowie".
The names themselves suggest that people were getting
pretty high on weed, even back then. :)
date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:57:11 +0200
author: 5trfg6h7
| |
