Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:18:38 -0500,    group: uk.politics.constitution        back       
#TEST YOUR POLITICAL IQ!!   
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/AC/AppealChapIQExhibits.htm

We have already seen that the strange people will argue even the most
outrageous absurdities seemingly into reality RELENTLESSLY as the
Jesuit Oath demands.  When we first encountered them over the
internet, we never thought that their influence and talents would go
outside of the discussions we were having over the internet.  We never
thought that the world population or the American people can be
deceived by them or would be unable to recognize their talents as we
witnessed them working on the newsgroups.  The bible winds up saying
some not so complimentary things about the intelligence of the nations
when Christ comes back the second time.  Let us then simply test your
intelligence just briefly here:

A tragedy takes place in your neighborhood.  Let's say that a store
was robbed and the storeowner was killed.  Police come and get ready
to start an investigation.  All of a sudden, someone approaches and
begins to obstruct the investigation.  He tried to conceal or cover-up
some of the evidence.

Question:  Do you know who perpetrated the crime?  Do you know who
might be involved?

Here you will be tested.  In current events after crimes or tragedies,
people and entities are covering up evidence and corrupting
investigations.  At the same time, these same people are insisting
that they had nothing to do with the tragedies or crimes.  They
repeatedly insist they are not involved.  What do you think?

Although current events would show people getting in the way of
investigations, the general public today wind up still not knowing who
or what has caused certain tragedies.  Just this one example alone
shows what has been happening to the intelligence and psyche of the
global population.  But let us put it this way:

You watch the judge shows like Judge Judy, Judge Matthis and others.
If a plaintiff and defendant are in any of these courts and the judge
learns that a crime is committed and that when the police start an
investigation, one of these worked to cover-up evidence or obstruct
the investigation, what would those judges assume?

If the judge asks a litigant questions as he or she is INVESTIGATING a
case, and the litigant constantly evades and will not plainly answer
the question, what will the judges assume?  What will happen?  I have
seen these judge programs and know what would happen.  The general
public also watches these programs regularly.  But something different
then happens WHEN THE US GOVERNMENT covers up investigations.  Because
so many strange people RELENTLESSLY bellow that the government is
exempt from this iron-clad rule known for ages, people are believing
this.

If any person or entity covers-up evidence that is to be used for an
investigation, it is to be perfectly assumed that the person had
something to do with the crime or tragedy.  It is true that say a
mother would tamper with evidence to prevent an investigation from
pointing to her son because of "love" and not because she herself is
guilty of any crime.  In ultimate justice, everyone is supposed to
understand that if they cover-up or conceal evidence, it is to be
assumed that they had something to do with the crime or tragedy.  All
such should enter the process of trial and punishment.  Much more
evidence is really not necessary.  During that period or process,
ultimate investigation of the incident should be continued, and, if
the actual truth is found in time, the person who obstructed the
investigation or covered up evidence might escape the most horrific
charges.  But everyone should know in advance that if they get in the
way of evidence or investigation, it should be assumed that they had
something to do with the crime or tragedy.  

Ever heard of the situation with Commerce Secretary Ron Brown under
the Clinton Administration?  He died mysteriously in a plane crash.
Just when a completely customary investigation was about to take
place, the administration demanded that the investigation be halted
and that it be assumed that the plane went down because of a bad
storm.  Since that time and before, situations like this have more and
more increased despite the distrust that such actions will naturally
earn.  As this activity escalates, they endeavor to make the American
people be conditioned into thinking this is normal behavior and no
indicator of any trouble.  They then bellow day and night about that
very frightening group of people called, "Conspiracy theorists" who
arouse their paranoia.

This test above is just one example.  Let's try another one.
Say, for some unknown reason, you were called to testify in the
Independent 911 investigation.  Brother Ted and I were talking about
this.  He was saying what would have happened had he been called to
testify in the Independent 911 hearings.  He said that IMMEDIATELY he
would have dropped everything he had planned and canceled everything.
He said he would make it to the hearings no matter where they are.  He
said that even upon being asked, he would be trembling.  When he got
there, he would easily testify under oath.

As he talked about this circumstance with me, he said, "Why shouldn't
I do that?  I have nothing to hide."  Both he and I had nothing to do
with 911 at all, and he was more than 1,000 miles away from Ground
Zero at the time.  When asked why he would tremble, his instant reply
was that THE WEIGHT OF 3,000 GRAVES WOULD BE HOVERING OVER HIS HEAD.
The case was different with President Bush.  Brother McMillan, was not
in any way responsible for protecting those 3,000 people who died at
911.  President Bush was.  President Bush failed them.  It doesn't
matter if Bush was outsmarted by the terrorists or not.  Something was
erected and paid for to protect those 3,000, and it failed to do so!
Notwithstanding, Brother McMillan would tremble, and instantly
cooperate to testify under oath at the 911 investigation.  President
Bush would not testify unless it was with Dick Cheney, and then, not
under oath.

Question:  Does president Bush care about the 3,000 who died at 911?

Answer:  NO!

Instantly the strange ones would lay many eggs with the hydrogen
sulfide gas.  We don't care.  There are certain things and even
intuitions that can be understood even by mothers.  The rules of the
game are the same even if it is the President of the United States.  

When the Patriot Act was established, those supporting this backward
set of laws asked why anyone would oppose it and then began to ask,
"You have something to hide?"  Perish the thought they would ask that
same question under their same rules when a serious investigation is
required where no one in their right minds would have any opposition
for testifying cleanly under oath, except those who have something to
hide.  Perish the thought that anyone in his right mind would start
such an investigation at any other time period other than RIGHT AWAY!

All these are telling signs!  If you cannot see this and other signs
AMERICA CAN FALL AND SOCIETY CAN BE DESTROYED, AND IT WOULD APPEAR AS
IF IT HAPPENED ALL OF A SUDDEN!!  Only then when America falls will
EVERYONE be able to look back and realize the signs that were there
all along that were babbled away by strange people and strange
propaganda teams acting as watchdogs against propaganda!!
You still may say that it is still unfair to conclude that Bush didn't
care and that we should be more careful.  Is this like the same
standard of carefulness when President Bush is being given the power
to be able to arrest and detain anyone without charge based upon
accusations when he has even publicly fouled up many times and started
a war based on invisible WMDs??

Next, the recent incident where Dick Cheney shot his friend in his
face while hunting.  The Sheriff of the area approached in order to
document the incident.  He was told to leave.  Naturally an
investigation is appropriate.  Dick Cheney refuses to talk to anyone
for 14 hours.  It is illegal to drink while hunting.  Normal procedure
could not be followed.  Dick Cheney used his power to prevent an
investigation in the same way one would be forced on an ordinary
citizen under the same circumstances.

Question:  Was Dick Cheney drinking at that time?

Answer:  YES!

You have to be definite and know what you're talking about.  Dick
Cheney would not have dismissed an investigation for some 14 hours if
he was not drinking.  Isn't that what you would conclude if a normal
citizen did the same thing and was somehow able to dismiss a timely
investigation?

You need to understand that this is what is weakening your power as a
citizen.  DO NOT THINK FOR ONE MINUTE THAT IF YOU FELL UNDER THE SAME
SITUATION, THE ONES CRYING THAT YOU DON'T KNOW OR CANNOT KNOW THAT
DICK CHENEY HAD BEEN DRINKING WILL THEN BE CONFUSED!  The ones telling
you to be careful exempt themselves when they see fit!  THEY ARE THE
FIGMENTS OF JACK CHICK'S VERY VIVID IMAGINATION!  They always crutch
you with their rules they themselves are immune to!  They tell you
that you have to respect those who differ.  You don't understand that
they themselves are not bound to this!!  That's why the government is
now more renegade and bold than ever!  When you are ready to check it
or even find out what is going on, the propaganda team is there to
tell you to BE CAREFULL!  UNDERSTAND THAT OTHERS DISAGREE WITH YOU!!
THE GOVERNMENT IS FINE!!  Can people disagree with that??  You
conclude:  THERE IS A CONSPIRACY!!  They then go...

"Look Mah!!  I'M ROLLIN' ON THE FLOOR!!  HAA HAA HAAA HAAAAAH!
CONSPIRACY THEORIST!  LOOK MAH, I'M ROLLIN' ON THE FLOOR!"

They then become your psychiatrists and talk of your paranoia, etc.
You thought all their time would be taken up rolling on the floor,
when people start talking about the conspiracy, THEN THEY HAVE TO ACT!

These are just three examples above testing our intelligence.  If you
failed the three examples above, you are in trouble and we wind up
suffering more and more.  No amount of babbling by even the
fifth-column army of treason in the United States is supposed to cause
you to not know clearly the answers to the two examples above.  If you
don't understand the conclusions above, you are losing the war of
liberty and for your country.  You are being taken step by step toward
misery and ruin.  Prosperity will more and more leave.  Then, TERROR
will more and more grow!  Just like the government is more and more
pushing terror concerns you never heard before nor needed to worry
about, the more you demonstrate to them that you are stupid, is the
faster these things appear.

Let's go through some more examples that are likely to stir or test
your intelligence...
date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:18:38 -0500   author:   Susan Williams

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us