|
|
|
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100,
group: uk.politics.censorship
back
Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
A NEW SLAVERY
Why has internet child pornography seen such an increase when there
are so many campaigns and organisations geared towards stamping it
out?
By Mark Williams-Thomas
Guardian Unlimited, UK: 19 April 2007
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/2007/04/a_new_slavery.html
[ http://tinyurl.com/23kzan ]
[Paraphrase of rest of article: "Give us more money!"]
Mark Williams-Thomas - Profile
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/profile.html
Mark Williams-Thomas is the managing director of WT Associates
Mark is a leading child protection consultant, having spent the last
15 years working in the field. He is an ex-police detective, with
considerable experience of running major paedophile investigations.
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100
author: Cub Reporter
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100, Cub Reporter
wrote:
>A NEW SLAVERY
>
>Why has internet child pornography seen such an increase when there
>are so many campaigns and organisations geared towards stamping it
>out?
>
>By Mark Williams-Thomas
>
>Guardian Unlimited, UK: 19 April 2007
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/2007/04/a_new_slavery.html
>[ http://tinyurl.com/23kzan ]
>
>[Paraphrase of rest of article: "Give us more money!"]
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas - Profile
>
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/profile.html
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas is the managing director of WT Associates
>
>Mark is a leading child protection consultant, having spent the last
>15 years working in the field. He is an ex-police detective, with
>considerable experience of running major paedophile investigations.
Kerching!
date: 19 Apr 2007 12:00:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
> Kerching!
You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
dickhead are you?
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
>
>> Kerching!
>
>You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
>dickhead are you?
What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
and a spam?
date: 20 Apr 2007 03:48:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
> and a spam?
It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100, Cub Reporter
wrote:
>A NEW SLAVERY
>
>Why has internet child pornography seen such an increase when there
>are so many campaigns and organisations geared towards stamping it
>out?
>
>By Mark Williams-Thomas
>
>Guardian Unlimited, UK: 19 April 2007
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/2007/04/a_new_slavery.html
>[ http://tinyurl.com/23kzan ]
>
>[Paraphrase of rest of article: "Give us more money!"]
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas - Profile
>
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/profile.html
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas is the managing director of WT Associates
>
>Mark is a leading child protection consultant, having spent the last
>15 years working in the field. He is an ex-police detective, with
>considerable experience of running major paedophile investigations.
Kerching!
date: 19 Apr 2007 12:00:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
> Kerching!
You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
dickhead are you?
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
>
>> Kerching!
>
>You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
>dickhead are you?
What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
and a spam?
date: 20 Apr 2007 03:48:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
> and a spam?
It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100, Cub Reporter
wrote:
>A NEW SLAVERY
>
>Why has internet child pornography seen such an increase when there
>are so many campaigns and organisations geared towards stamping it
>out?
>
>By Mark Williams-Thomas
>
>Guardian Unlimited, UK: 19 April 2007
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/2007/04/a_new_slavery.html
>[ http://tinyurl.com/23kzan ]
>
>[Paraphrase of rest of article: "Give us more money!"]
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas - Profile
>
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/profile.html
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas is the managing director of WT Associates
>
>Mark is a leading child protection consultant, having spent the last
>15 years working in the field. He is an ex-police detective, with
>considerable experience of running major paedophile investigations.
Kerching!
date: 19 Apr 2007 12:00:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
> Kerching!
You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
dickhead are you?
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
>
>> Kerching!
>
>You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
>dickhead are you?
What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
and a spam?
date: 20 Apr 2007 03:48:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
> and a spam?
It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100, Cub Reporter
wrote:
>A NEW SLAVERY
>
>Why has internet child pornography seen such an increase when there
>are so many campaigns and organisations geared towards stamping it
>out?
>
>By Mark Williams-Thomas
>
>Guardian Unlimited, UK: 19 April 2007
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/2007/04/a_new_slavery.html
>[ http://tinyurl.com/23kzan ]
>
>[Paraphrase of rest of article: "Give us more money!"]
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas - Profile
>
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/profile.html
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas is the managing director of WT Associates
>
>Mark is a leading child protection consultant, having spent the last
>15 years working in the field. He is an ex-police detective, with
>considerable experience of running major paedophile investigations.
Kerching!
date: 19 Apr 2007 12:00:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
> Kerching!
You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
dickhead are you?
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
>
>> Kerching!
>
>You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
>dickhead are you?
What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
and a spam?
date: 20 Apr 2007 03:48:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
> and a spam?
It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100, Cub Reporter
wrote:
>A NEW SLAVERY
>
>Why has internet child pornography seen such an increase when there
>are so many campaigns and organisations geared towards stamping it
>out?
>
>By Mark Williams-Thomas
>
>Guardian Unlimited, UK: 19 April 2007
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/2007/04/a_new_slavery.html
>[ http://tinyurl.com/23kzan ]
>
>[Paraphrase of rest of article: "Give us more money!"]
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas - Profile
>
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/profile.html
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas is the managing director of WT Associates
>
>Mark is a leading child protection consultant, having spent the last
>15 years working in the field. He is an ex-police detective, with
>considerable experience of running major paedophile investigations.
Kerching!
date: 19 Apr 2007 12:00:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
> Kerching!
You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
dickhead are you?
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
>
>> Kerching!
>
>You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
>dickhead are you?
What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
and a spam?
date: 20 Apr 2007 03:48:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
> and a spam?
It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100, Cub Reporter
wrote:
>A NEW SLAVERY
>
>Why has internet child pornography seen such an increase when there
>are so many campaigns and organisations geared towards stamping it
>out?
>
>By Mark Williams-Thomas
>
>Guardian Unlimited, UK: 19 April 2007
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/2007/04/a_new_slavery.html
>[ http://tinyurl.com/23kzan ]
>
>[Paraphrase of rest of article: "Give us more money!"]
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas - Profile
>
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/profile.html
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas is the managing director of WT Associates
>
>Mark is a leading child protection consultant, having spent the last
>15 years working in the field. He is an ex-police detective, with
>considerable experience of running major paedophile investigations.
Kerching!
date: 19 Apr 2007 12:00:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
> Kerching!
You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
dickhead are you?
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
>
>> Kerching!
>
>You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
>dickhead are you?
What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
and a spam?
date: 20 Apr 2007 03:48:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
> and a spam?
It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:32 +0100, Cub Reporter
wrote:
>A NEW SLAVERY
>
>Why has internet child pornography seen such an increase when there
>are so many campaigns and organisations geared towards stamping it
>out?
>
>By Mark Williams-Thomas
>
>Guardian Unlimited, UK: 19 April 2007
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/2007/04/a_new_slavery.html
>[ http://tinyurl.com/23kzan ]
>
>[Paraphrase of rest of article: "Give us more money!"]
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas - Profile
>
>http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/mark_williamsthomas/profile.html
>
>Mark Williams-Thomas is the managing director of WT Associates
>
>Mark is a leading child protection consultant, having spent the last
>15 years working in the field. He is an ex-police detective, with
>considerable experience of running major paedophile investigations.
Kerching!
date: 19 Apr 2007 12:00:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
> Kerching!
You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
dickhead are you?
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
>
>> Kerching!
>
>You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
>dickhead are you?
What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
and a spam?
date: 20 Apr 2007 03:48:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
> and a spam?
It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
> Kerching!
You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
dickhead are you?
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:17:08 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-19, hg wrote:
>
>> Kerching!
>
>You quoted and reposted a whole spam just to add that? What kind if
>dickhead are you?
What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
and a spam?
date: 20 Apr 2007 03:48:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
> and a spam?
It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:00 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> What kind of dickhead doesn't know the difference between a crosspost
>> and a spam?
>
>It was a puff piece for a given company, therefore a spam, you quoted
>the whole thing just to add "kerching" on the end, oh what wit.
Read it again, moron.
date: 20 Apr 2007 09:31:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> Read it again, moron.
Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
post just to add a one-liner.
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
wrote:
>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>
>> Read it again, moron.
>
>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>post just to add a one-liner.
Ok ;)
date: 20 Apr 2007 11:40:02 -0500
author: hg
|
Re: Shallow analysis of 'child porn'
On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:25:46 +0100, Ian Rawlings
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-04-20, hg wrote:
>>
>>> Read it again, moron.
>>
>>Heh, OK moron hat duly donned, however please don't quote an entire
>>post just to add a one-liner.
>
>
> Ok ;)
Grr!
--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:48:53 +0100
author: Ian Rawlings
|
|
|
