Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
politics
animals
announce
censorship
constitution
crime
drugs
economics
electoral
environment
guns
misc
parliament
philosophy
  
 
date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:49:48 -0600,    group: uk.politics.animals        back       
Re: Destruction of rainforest accelerates despite outcry   
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:37:36 -0000 "pearl"  wrote:
> "pearl"  wrote in message news:fncgef$etq$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
> > "Rudy Canoza"  wrote in message news:8875ce5a-d459-484f-a6ce-43442d1b60de@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jan 24, 1:43 pm, chico <ch...@chico.chico> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:17:46 -0800 Rudy Canoza  wrote:
> > > > chico wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:18:17 -0000 "pearl"  wrote:
> > > > >> "Derek"  wrote in messagenews:50ofp3hkndj9adoj75mkf72e20jukbp5s1@4ax.com...
> > >
> > > > >>> Thanks for that, but I read it all earlier and found that we did eat
> > > > >>> meat.
> > > > >> Who's "we"? What part of "*not* for purposes of provisioning,
> > > > >> but in the context of competitive male displays." don't you get?
> > >
> > > > > You don't get it,
> >
> > It's you that's not getting it, .. or pretending not to.
> >
> > > > >> Talking about evolution, there's precious little evidence of that..
> > >
> > > > > That's very rich coming from someone who shaved her head to seduce a violent skinhead.
> > >
> > > > Haw haw haw! Excellent!
> >
> > It's a lie.
> >
> > > > Glad to see you again, Mr. C.; been awhile.
> >
> > Ran away after a thrashing.
> >
> > > I see Leslie's still having a very difficult time with this "reality" thing.
> >
> > No surprise, for someone who believes
> >
> > ---------------------
> >
> > Part fact, part fiction.
> 
> - The 'list', of course.

The last is completely accurate. Even Sophist Bob stopped defending you.
 
> 'A favored technique is to debilitate your identity [personally,
> I hate the term self-esteem] by levelling false accusations
> and/or questioning your honesty, fidelity, trustworthiness,
> your "true" motivations, your "real" character, your sanity
> and judgement.

No need to do that because the list is true. The links show that you support, defend, believe in, etc., the things in that list. Shall we go through it again point by point?.

> A desperate ploy by these desperate abnormal individuals.

Taken any more "chemtrail" pics lately?
date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:49:48 -0600   author:   chico o

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us