|
|
|
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:38:57 +0000,
group: uk.people.silversurfers
back
2nd Call For Votes
Published today in uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config and
uk.net.news.management.
For anyone who can't see the groups (or prefer not to go to unnc or
unnm) the votetakers address is:-
xcom2k9b at request dot ukvoting dot org dot uk
Full details of the candidates is included with the voting email.
Candidates C, D and E are up for re-election. The others appear to me
to have decided to seek election in a fit of pique because their
moderated group wasn't created as quickly as the proponent thinks it
should have been. YVMV.
--
John the R-T
Do NOT reply to the heypete address. Reply to is valid
http://www.john-the-r-t.co.uk/ Cruise and Family site.
http://john-the-r-t.110mb.com/ - Annexe.
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:38:57 +0000
author: John the R-T
|
From uk.people.silversurfers
John the R-T wrote:
> Published today in uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config and
> uk.net.news.management.
> For anyone who can't see the groups (or prefer not to go to unnc or
> unnm) the votetakers address is:-
> xcom2k9b at request dot ukvoting dot org dot uk
> Full details of the candidates is included with the voting email.
>
> Candidates C, D and E are up for re-election. The others appear to me
> to have decided to seek election in a fit of pique because their
> moderated group wasn't created as quickly as the proponent thinks it
> should have been. YVMV.
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:33:14 +0000 (UTC)
author: Tony Little
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:38:57 +0000, John the R-T wrote:
> Published today in uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config and
> uk.net.news.management.
> For anyone who can't see the groups (or prefer not to go to unnc or
> unnm) the votetakers address is:-
> xcom2k9b at request dot ukvoting dot org dot uk
> Full details of the candidates is included with the voting email.
>
> Candidates C, D and E are up for re-election. The others appear to me
> to have decided to seek election in a fit of pique because their
> moderated group wasn't created as quickly as the proponent thinks it
> should have been. YVMV.
Thanks John - I will be voting !!
--
Regards,
Troy's Human.
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:47:44 +0000
author: Troy's Human
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:47:44 +0000, Troy's Human wrote:
> Thanks John -
YW
> I will be voting !!
Don't forget that you only need to vote for those you would like to
see on the Kommittee.
--
John the R-T
Do NOT reply to the heypete address. Reply to is valid
http://www.john-the-r-t.co.uk/ Cruise and Family site.
http://john-the-r-t.110mb.com/ - Annexe.
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:06:17 +0000
author: John the R-T
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"John the R-T" wrote ...
> Troy's Human wrote:
>
>> Thanks John -
>
> YW
>
>> I will be voting !!
>
> Don't forget that you only need to vote for those you would like to
> see on the Kommittee.
>
> --
o'K'........ Lol
It's been a while since I voted, can you remind me how to do it ?
Ta
Regards....... P-f
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:20:26 -0000
author: Parrotfish
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:20:26 -0000, Parrotfish wrote:
> o'K'........ Lol
> It's been a while since I voted, can you remind me how to do it ?
Yep. Send an email to
xcom2k9b at request dot ukvoting dot org dot uk
Change at to @
Change dot to .
You will get a reply. Reply to that email having first deleted
everything before
- - - - - - - - Delete this line and everything above it - - - - - - - -
Fill in your preferences [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] etc.
You only need to vote for your prefered candidates. I only voted for
three.
--
John the R-T
Do NOT reply to the heypete address. Reply to is valid
http://www.john-the-r-t.co.uk/ Cruise and Family site.
http://john-the-r-t.110mb.com/ - Annexe.
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:12:42 +0000
author: John the R-T
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"John the R-T" wrote ...
> Parrotfish wrote:
>
>> o'K'........ Lol
>> It's been a while since I voted, can you remind me how to do it ?
>
> Yep. Send an email to
> xcom2k9b at request dot ukvoting dot org dot uk
>
> Change at to @
> Change dot to .
>
> You will get a reply. Reply to that email having first deleted
> everything before
>
> - - - - - - - - Delete this line and everything above it - - - - - - - -
>
> Fill in your preferences [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] etc.
> You only need to vote for your prefered candidates. I only voted for
> three.
>
> --
Thankyou :o)
Regards........ P-f
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:48:17 -0000
author: Parrotfish
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:12:42 +0000, John the R-T wrote:
> Fill in your preferences [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] etc.
> You only need to vote for your prefered candidates. I only voted for
> three.
I think I've done it :-)
I only voted for three as well :-)
I'd never vote for a "kat" - only joking :-)
--
Regards,
Troy's Human.
date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:50:19 +0000
author: Troy's Human
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"Troy's Human" wrote ...
> John the R-T wrote:
>
>> Fill in your preferences [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] etc.
>> You only need to vote for your prefered candidates. I only voted for
>> three.
>
> I think I've done it :-)
>
> I only voted for three as well :-)
>
> I'd never vote for a "kat" - only joking :-)
> --
I just had my request bounced :o(
Oh well, at least I've got a few days to get it right.
Regards.......P-f
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:03:46 -0000
author: Parrotfish
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:12:42 +0000, John the R-T wrote:
> You only need to vote for your prefered candidates. I only voted for
> three.
Funny, so did I.
--
Ali
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:32:24 GMT
author: Ali on netbook
|
Re: From uk.people.silversurfers
"Tony Little" wrote in message
news:38mt3r.io6.17.1@news.alt.net...
> John the R-T wrote:
>
>> Published today in uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config and
>> uk.net.news.management.
>> For anyone who can't see the groups (or prefer not to go to unnc or
>> unnm) the votetakers address is:-
>> xcom2k9b at request dot ukvoting dot org dot uk
>> Full details of the candidates is included with the voting email.
>>
>> Candidates C, D and E are up for re-election. The others appear to me
>> to have decided to seek election in a fit of pique because their
>> moderated group wasn't created as quickly as the proponent thinks it
>> should have been. YVMV.
Stick around in ups young man, we should be re-posting the recipe for
clootie dumpling again soon .
--
Ticketty᧧
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 05:18:46 -0000
author: Tickettyboo
|
Re: From uk.people.silversurfers
Tony Little said:
> John the R-T wrote:
>
>> Published today in uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config and
>> uk.net.news.management.
>> For anyone who can't see the groups (or prefer not to go to unnc or
>> unnm) the votetakers address is:-
>> xcom2k9b at request dot ukvoting dot org dot uk
>> Full details of the candidates is included with the voting email.
>>
>> Candidates C, D and E are up for re-election. The others appear to
>> me to have decided to seek election in a fit of pique because their
>> moderated group wasn't created as quickly as the proponent thinks it
>> should have been. YVMV.
The correct way to get the CFV is to go to one of the groups in which it is
published and request it from there. So let's do it by the book, you don't
want to have votes disallowed, or make extra work for the vote taker.
If you really hate unnm, unnc is just about empty and the announce group is
just that, announcements. But the discussion might be worth reading, you
don't need to join in.
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:01:13 -0000
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
Tickettyboo said:
> "John the R-T" wrote in message
> news:194ywpmiqgv2x$.q20ijiaxv15t.dlg@40tude.net...
>>
>> Candidates C, D and E are up for re-election. The others appear to
>> me to have decided to seek election in a fit of pique because their
>> moderated group wasn't created as quickly as the proponent thinks it
>> should have been. YVMV.
>
> LOL they dunno how lucky they are, look how long it took us!
> Though there are no hard feelings, I got to learn a new phrase, still
> not had occasion to use the epithet
> F***wit, but I have it in readiness should the need arise :-)
It took them slightly longer in fact, but the votetaker got swine flu and
went missing for a while. The main difference is, we tried to accomodate
the concerns of the unnmers, (at least I thought we did) and were pleased
once it was done, because we got what we wanted in the end, while the
proponent in this case wanted it all his own way, was mostly unwilling to
consider changes, and is still moaning, despite getting it just about all
his own way. And one of those ways is causing trouble.
I have a little sympathy, I know what it's like, waiting, but on the other
hand, I was privy to the emails he was sent by the committee and I know he
has misrepresented them entirely. You can read all about it in unnm. If you
want to that is.:-)
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:20:05 GMT
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
Parrotfish said:
> "Troy's Human" wrote ...
>> John the R-T wrote:
>>
>>> Fill in your preferences [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] etc.
>>> You only need to vote for your prefered candidates. I only voted
>>> for three.
>>
>> I think I've done it :-)
>>
>> I only voted for three as well :-)
>>
>> I'd never vote for a "kat" - only joking :-)
>> --
> I just had my request bounced :o(
> Oh well, at least I've got a few days to get it right.
>
Parrotfish, go to one of the groups, unnc is quiet just now, and open the
CFV post and Reply To Poster. That shouldn't have any problems getting
delivered, it's the proper way to do it and made easy, you don't need to
write a thing at that point.
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:40:05 GMT
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"kat" wrote ...
> Parrotfish said:
>
>> "Troy's Human" wrote ...
>>> John the R-T wrote:
>>>
>>>> Fill in your preferences [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] etc.
>>>> You only need to vote for your prefered candidates. I only voted
>>>> for three.
>>>
>>> I think I've done it :-)
>>>
>>> I only voted for three as well :-)
>>>
>>> I'd never vote for a "kat" - only joking :-)
>>> --
>> I just had my request bounced :o(
>> Oh well, at least I've got a few days to get it right.
>>
>
> Parrotfish, go to one of the groups, unnc is quiet just now, and open the
> CFV post and Reply To Poster. That shouldn't have any problems getting
> delivered, it's the proper way to do it and made easy, you don't need to
> write a thing at that point.
>
>
> --
Thanks Kat. :o)
Regards...... P-f
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:16:32 -0000
author: Parrotfish
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"John the R-T" wrote in message
news:194ywpmiqgv2x$.q20ijiaxv15t.dlg@40tude.net...
<snip>
> Candidates C, D and E are up for re-election. The others appear to me
> to have decided to seek election in a fit of pique because their
> moderated group wasn't created as quickly as the proponent thinks it
> should have been. YVMV.
YVMV ?
..... YVMV ???
(Googled) Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus ?????
........ What's that got to do wi.....
Aaaah! I get it.
Yellow Violet Magenta Violet!
Of course. Silly me.
:-)
...or is it Young Violent Militant Vandals?
--
ned
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:39:36 -0000
author: ned
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:39:36 -0000, ned wrote:
> YVMV ?
> ..... YVMV ???
> (Googled) Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus ?????
>
> ........ What's that got to do wi.....
> Aaaah! I get it.
> Yellow Violet Magenta Violet!
> Of course. Silly me.
> :-)
> ...or is it Young Violent Militant Vandals?
None of the above.
Your View May Vary. In other words, "You may not agree".
HTH
--
John the R-T
Do NOT reply to the heypete address. Reply to is valid
http://www.john-the-r-t.co.uk/ Cruise and Family site.
http://john-the-r-t.110mb.com/ - Annexe.
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:59:50 +0000
author: John the R-T
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"kat" wrote in message
news:hcrgoo$fa0$1@babylon5.colinjones.co.uk...
> You can read all about it in unnm. If you want to that is.:-)
I did read some, still lurk around in there and in unnc. I didn't vote, I am
not a fan of the principle of moderation on usenet, the whole point of
usenet (to me) is that is is unmoderated. That does bring its own set of
problems, but leaves me where I like to be, in charge of what I read and
post. :-)
--
Ticketty᧧
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:21:09 -0000
author: Tickettyboo
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
Tickettyboo said:
> "kat" wrote in message
> news:hcrgoo$fa0$1@babylon5.colinjones.co.uk...
>> You can read all about it in unnm. If you want to that is.:-)
>
> I did read some, still lurk around in there and in unnc. I didn't
> vote, I am not a fan of the principle of moderation on usenet, the
> whole point of usenet (to me) is that is is unmoderated. That does
> bring its own set of problems, but leaves me where I like to be, in
> charge of what I read and post. :-)
Well, there's one man, not a candidate, wants all of usenet moderated, uk,
anyway, because it's a cesspool full of trolls etc. Others seem to think
it's the only way to win back people who like web forums. And I think Mr
Jackson wants moderated groups to go though on the nod.
I'll vote for if there is a very good reason. But he wants No votes to not
be counted. That's not democratic. Of course, being on the Committee won't
help him change the rules so that's all irrelevant in a way. If he RFDs
such a change you may want to get involved, if only by voting against it!
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:05 GMT
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:05 GMT, kat wrote:
> Tickettyboo said:
>
>> "kat" wrote in message
>> news:hcrgoo$fa0$1@babylon5.colinjones.co.uk...
>>> You can read all about it in unnm. If you want to that is.:-)
>>
>> I did read some, still lurk around in there and in unnc. I didn't
>> vote, I am not a fan of the principle of moderation on usenet, the
>> whole point of usenet (to me) is that is is unmoderated. That does
>> bring its own set of problems, but leaves me where I like to be, in
>> charge of what I read and post. :-)
>
> Well, there's one man, not a candidate, wants all of usenet moderated, uk,
> anyway, because it's a cesspool full of trolls etc. Others seem to think
> it's the only way to win back people who like web forums. And I think Mr
> Jackson wants moderated groups to go though on the nod.
>
> I'll vote for if there is a very good reason. But he wants No votes to not
> be counted. That's not democratic. Of course, being on the Committee won't
> help him change the rules so that's all irrelevant in a way. If he RFDs
> such a change you may want to get involved, if only by voting against it!
Kat, have you got a link to the CFV post, please?
I downloaded 500 posts in both unnc and unnm but couldn't find the actual
post.
--
MCC
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:52:49 +0000
author: MCC
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"MCC" wrote in message
news:15ir02f3k08hf$.5idr1lr9dlnu$.dlg@40tude.net...
> Kat, have you got a link to the CFV post, please?
> I downloaded 500 posts in both unnc and unnm but couldn't find the actual
> post.
This is the one I used to reply to and have now voted
news:cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net...
--
Ticketty᧧
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:01:03 -0000
author: Tickettyboo
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
MCC said:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:05 GMT, kat wrote:
>
>> Tickettyboo said:
>>
>>> "kat" wrote in message
>>> news:hcrgoo$fa0$1@babylon5.colinjones.co.uk...
>>>> You can read all about it in unnm. If you want to that is.:-)
>>>
>>> I did read some, still lurk around in there and in unnc. I didn't
>>> vote, I am not a fan of the principle of moderation on usenet, the
>>> whole point of usenet (to me) is that is is unmoderated. That does
>>> bring its own set of problems, but leaves me where I like to be, in
>>> charge of what I read and post. :-)
>>
>> Well, there's one man, not a candidate, wants all of usenet
>> moderated, uk, anyway, because it's a cesspool full of trolls etc.
>> Others seem to think it's the only way to win back people who like
>> web forums. And I think Mr Jackson wants moderated groups to go
>> though on the nod.
>>
>> I'll vote for if there is a very good reason. But he wants No votes
>> to not be counted. That's not democratic. Of course, being on the
>> Committee won't help him change the rules so that's all irrelevant
>> in a way. If he RFDs such a change you may want to get involved, if
>> only by voting against it!
>
> Kat, have you got a link to the CFV post, please?
> I downloaded 500 posts in both unnc and unnm but couldn't find the
> actual post.
Try unna, the announce group, it's the latest post there, that's the second
call, dated yesterday.
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:10:07 GMT
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:01:03 -0000, Tickettyboo wrote:
> "MCC" wrote in message
> news:15ir02f3k08hf$.5idr1lr9dlnu$.dlg@40tude.net...
>> Kat, have you got a link to the CFV post, please?
>> I downloaded 500 posts in both unnc and unnm but couldn't find the actual
>> post.
>
> This is the one I used to reply to and have now voted
>
> news:cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net...
Got this from Google groups
<quote>
Not Found
The requested message,
cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net, could not
be found.
<unquote>
--
MCC
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:32:33 +0000
author: MCC
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:10:07 GMT, kat wrote:
> MCC said:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:05 GMT, kat wrote:
>>
>>> Tickettyboo said:
>>>
>>>> "kat" wrote in message
>>>> news:hcrgoo$fa0$1@babylon5.colinjones.co.uk...
>>>>> You can read all about it in unnm. If you want to that is.:-)
>>>>
>>>> I did read some, still lurk around in there and in unnc. I didn't
>>>> vote, I am not a fan of the principle of moderation on usenet, the
>>>> whole point of usenet (to me) is that is is unmoderated. That does
>>>> bring its own set of problems, but leaves me where I like to be, in
>>>> charge of what I read and post. :-)
>>>
>>> Well, there's one man, not a candidate, wants all of usenet
>>> moderated, uk, anyway, because it's a cesspool full of trolls etc.
>>> Others seem to think it's the only way to win back people who like
>>> web forums. And I think Mr Jackson wants moderated groups to go
>>> though on the nod.
>>>
>>> I'll vote for if there is a very good reason. But he wants No votes
>>> to not be counted. That's not democratic. Of course, being on the
>>> Committee won't help him change the rules so that's all irrelevant
>>> in a way. If he RFDs such a change you may want to get involved, if
>>> only by voting against it!
>>
>> Kat, have you got a link to the CFV post, please?
>> I downloaded 500 posts in both unnc and unnm but couldn't find the
>> actual post.
>
> Try unna, the announce group, it's the latest post there, that's the second
> call, dated yesterday.
According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
--
MCC
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000
author: MCC
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
MCC said:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:10:07 GMT, kat wrote:
>
>> MCC said:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:05 GMT, kat wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tickettyboo said:
>>>>
>>>>> "kat" wrote in message
>>>>> news:hcrgoo$fa0$1@babylon5.colinjones.co.uk...
>>>>>> You can read all about it in unnm. If you want to that is.:-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I did read some, still lurk around in there and in unnc. I didn't
>>>>> vote, I am not a fan of the principle of moderation on usenet, the
>>>>> whole point of usenet (to me) is that is is unmoderated. That does
>>>>> bring its own set of problems, but leaves me where I like to be,
>>>>> in charge of what I read and post. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Well, there's one man, not a candidate, wants all of usenet
>>>> moderated, uk, anyway, because it's a cesspool full of trolls etc.
>>>> Others seem to think it's the only way to win back people who like
>>>> web forums. And I think Mr Jackson wants moderated groups to go
>>>> though on the nod.
>>>>
>>>> I'll vote for if there is a very good reason. But he wants No votes
>>>> to not be counted. That's not democratic. Of course, being on the
>>>> Committee won't help him change the rules so that's all irrelevant
>>>> in a way. If he RFDs such a change you may want to get involved,
>>>> if only by voting against it!
>>>
>>> Kat, have you got a link to the CFV post, please?
>>> I downloaded 500 posts in both unnc and unnm but couldn't find the
>>> actual post.
>>
>> Try unna, the announce group, it's the latest post there, that's the
>> second call, dated yesterday.
>
> According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
>
> I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
There are! I have 24 going back to August! And that's in NIN.
Go back to your download in unnc, the Second CFV was posted 03/11/2009 at
19.20. There are only 3 posts in there after it. The first was 32/10 and
that's only the 10th post back from the newest too.
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:05:06 GMT
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
MCC said:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:01:03 -0000, Tickettyboo wrote:
>
>> "MCC" wrote in message
>> news:15ir02f3k08hf$.5idr1lr9dlnu$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>> Kat, have you got a link to the CFV post, please?
>>> I downloaded 500 posts in both unnc and unnm but couldn't find the
>>> actual post.
>>
>> This is the one I used to reply to and have now voted
>>
>> news:cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net...
>
> Got this from Google groups
> <quote>
> Not Found
> The requested message,
> cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net, could
> not be found.
> <unquote>
news:cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net
It might be those dots causing the problem?
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:05:06 GMT
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:32:33 +0000, MCC wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:01:03 -0000, Tickettyboo wrote:
>
>> [9 quoted lines suppressed]
>
> Got this from Google groups
> <quote>
> Not Found
> The requested message,
> cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net, could not
> be found.
> <unquote>
ditto :(
--
What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments,
but what is woven into the lives of others.
http://ariesval.co.uk/val/
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:17:01 +0000
author: AriesVal
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:05:06 GMT, kat wrote:
> MCC said:
>
>> [40 quoted lines suppressed]
>
> There are! I have 24 going back to August! And that's in NIN.
>
> Go back to your download in unnc, the Second CFV was posted 03/11/2009 at
> 19.20. There are only 3 posts in there after it. The first was 32/10 and
> that's only the 10th post back from the newest too.
Kat, I can't see any November posts via nin except one from Boo on 4/11
which was crossposted.
--
When we do right no-one remembers,
When we do wrong no-one forgets.
http://ariesval.co.uk/val/
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:20:54 +0000
author: AriesVal
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:20:54 +0000, AriesVal wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:05:06 GMT, kat wrote:
>
>> [9 quoted lines suppressed]
>
> Kat, I can't see any November posts via nin except one from Boo on 4/11
> which was crossposted.
and the same with Eternal September, and Plusnet too!
--
Walk while ye have the light, lest darkness come upon you.
John Ruskin
http://ariesval.co.uk/val/
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:22:39 +0000
author: AriesVal
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000, MCC wrote:
> According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
>
> I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
I can see it on Plusnet, Datemas and eternal-september. Looking at
the message ID I see that there is no dot between gradwell and net.
Can't find it with Google though.
--
John the R-T
Do NOT reply to the heypete address. Reply to is valid
http://www.john-the-r-t.co.uk/ Cruise and Family site.
http://john-the-r-t.110mb.com/ - Annexe.
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:22:58 +0000
author: John the R-T
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:59:50 +0000, John the R-T
wrote:
>On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:39:36 -0000, ned wrote:
>
>> YVMV ?
>> ..... YVMV ???
>> (Googled) Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus ?????
>>
>> ........ What's that got to do wi.....
>> Aaaah! I get it.
>> Yellow Violet Magenta Violet!
>> Of course. Silly me.
>> :-)
>> ...or is it Young Violent Militant Vandals?
>
>None of the above.
>
>Your View May Vary. In other words, "You may not agree".
>
>HTH
I thought it was "Your Vote May Vary" :-;
--
Pete
date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:24:11 +0000
author: Peter Grange
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"John the R-T" wrote in message
news:wmefrz1ncytd$.1m4ej6odp7xi2.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:39:36 -0000, ned wrote:
>
>> YVMV ?
>> ..... YVMV ???
>> (Googled) Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus ?????
>>
>> ........ What's that got to do wi.....
>> Aaaah! I get it.
>> Yellow Violet Magenta Violet!
>> Of course. Silly me.
>> :-)
>> ...or is it Young Violent Militant Vandals?
>
> None of the above.
>
> Your View May Vary. In other words, "You may not agree".
>
> HTH
SAHIH
:-)
Thanks John. I obviously don't spend enough time in the group.
--
ned
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:33:28 -0000
author: ned
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:22:58 +0000, John the R-T wrote:
> I can see it on Plusnet, Datemas and eternal-september. Looking at
> the message ID I see that there is no dot between gradwell and net.
> Can't find it with Google though.
Copernic found a link though:-
http://www.myreader.co.uk/msg/1253184.aspx
Scroll down a little.
--
John the R-T
Do NOT reply to the heypete address. Reply to is valid
http://www.john-the-r-t.co.uk/ Cruise and Family site.
http://john-the-r-t.110mb.com/ - Annexe.
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:34:04 +0000
author: John the R-T
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:24:11 +0000, Peter Grange wrote:
> I thought it was "Your Vote May Vary" :-;
:-)
Could be. But I meant it for any lurkers from elsewhere.
--
John the R-T
Do NOT reply to the heypete address. Reply to is valid
http://www.john-the-r-t.co.uk/ Cruise and Family site.
http://john-the-r-t.110mb.com/ - Annexe.
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:38:19 +0000
author: John the R-T
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000, MCC wrote:
> According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
>
> I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
Have you checked your filters? ISTR you delete all posts over 100
lines. The CFV is 597 lines.
--
John the R-T
Do NOT reply to the heypete address. Reply to is valid
http://www.john-the-r-t.co.uk/ Cruise and Family site.
http://john-the-r-t.110mb.com/ - Annexe.
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:01:47 +0000
author: John the R-T
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"MCC" wrote in message
news:qijoq9cqxazy$.3k5lbqamaaew.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:01:03 -0000, Tickettyboo wrote:
>>
>> news:cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net...
>
> Got this from Google groups
> <quote>
> Not Found
> The requested message,
> cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net, could not
> be found.
> <unquote>
Clicking on that link here opened up as a normal Usenet post.
--
Sandra
People will forget what you said.
People will forget what you did, but
People will never forget how you made them feel.
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:14:06 -0000
author: Rabbit
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"John the R-T" wrote in message
news:1mt6lha0lq4g8.poswmwo1g1qd$.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000, MCC wrote:
>
>> According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
>>
>> I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
>
> I can see it on Plusnet, Datemas and eternal-september. Looking at
> the message ID I see that there is no dot between gradwell and net.
> Can't find it with Google though.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.net.news.announce/browse_thread/thread/f4e457a9a3d13ae6?hl=en
will take you to the post.
--
Sandra
People will forget what you said.
People will forget what you did, but
People will never forget how you made them feel.
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:16:07 -0000
author: Rabbit
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:01:47 +0000, John the R-T wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000, MCC wrote:
>
>> According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
>>
>> I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
>
> Have you checked your filters? ISTR you delete all posts over 100
> lines. The CFV is 597 lines.
You were nearly right John :-)
Not only have I got posts over 150 lines filtered, but also those
cross-posted to more than 2 groups so the CFV failed on both counts <LOL>
It must have been easier to vote in the recent Afghanistan elections ;-)
What a palaver.
--
MCC
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:21:40 +0000
author: MCC
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:05:06 GMT, kat wrote:
> MCC said:
>
>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:10:07 GMT, kat wrote:
>>
>>> MCC said:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:05 GMT, kat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Tickettyboo said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "kat" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hcrgoo$fa0$1@babylon5.colinjones.co.uk...
>>>>>>> You can read all about it in unnm. If you want to that is.:-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did read some, still lurk around in there and in unnc. I didn't
>>>>>> vote, I am not a fan of the principle of moderation on usenet, the
>>>>>> whole point of usenet (to me) is that is is unmoderated. That does
>>>>>> bring its own set of problems, but leaves me where I like to be,
>>>>>> in charge of what I read and post. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, there's one man, not a candidate, wants all of usenet
>>>>> moderated, uk, anyway, because it's a cesspool full of trolls etc.
>>>>> Others seem to think it's the only way to win back people who like
>>>>> web forums. And I think Mr Jackson wants moderated groups to go
>>>>> though on the nod.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll vote for if there is a very good reason. But he wants No votes
>>>>> to not be counted. That's not democratic. Of course, being on the
>>>>> Committee won't help him change the rules so that's all irrelevant
>>>>> in a way. If he RFDs such a change you may want to get involved,
>>>>> if only by voting against it!
>>>>
>>>> Kat, have you got a link to the CFV post, please?
>>>> I downloaded 500 posts in both unnc and unnm but couldn't find the
>>>> actual post.
>>>
>>> Try unna, the announce group, it's the latest post there, that's the
>>> second call, dated yesterday.
>>
>> According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
>>
>> I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
>
> There are! I have 24 going back to August! And that's in NIN.
>
> Go back to your download in unnc, the Second CFV was posted 03/11/2009 at
> 19.20. There are only 3 posts in there after it. The first was 32/10 and
> that's only the 10th post back from the newest too.
Eventually found it, thanks, Kat. My filters were deleting posts of more
than 150 lines and those crossposted to more than 2 groups.
--
MCC
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:23:01 +0000
author: MCC
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:14:06 -0000, Rabbit wrote:
> "MCC" wrote in message
> news:qijoq9cqxazy$.3k5lbqamaaew.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:01:03 -0000, Tickettyboo wrote:
>>>
>>> news:cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net...
>>
>> Got this from Google groups
>> <quote>
>> Not Found
>> The requested message,
>> cfv1-committee-elections-2009-20091103192033$2894@gradwell.net, could not
>> be found.
>> <unquote>
>
> Clicking on that link here opened up as a normal Usenet post.
How strange ?
--
It is because we are different that each of us is special.
http://ariesval.co.uk/val/
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:37:15 +0000
author: AriesVal
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:23:01 +0000, MCC wrote:
> Eventually found it, thanks, Kat. My filters were deleting posts of more
> than 150 lines and those crossposted to more than 2 groups.
LOL thanks Mike, I guess I'd better check my filters as well !
--
Only you know what is best for you.
http://ariesval.co.uk/val/
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:37:54 +0000
author: AriesVal
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
"AriesVal" wrote in message
news:1jzmeodapgtxb.h2czl3ihk3my.dlg@40tude.net...
> Kat, I can't see any November posts via nin except one from Boo on 4/11
> which was crossposted.
then there is 'definitely' summat up, cos there aren't any posts from me in
unnc that were crossposted
:-)
--
Ticketty᧧
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:42:02 -0000
author: Tickettyboo
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
Tickettyboo said:
> "AriesVal" wrote in message
> news:1jzmeodapgtxb.h2czl3ihk3my.dlg@40tude.net...
>> Kat, I can't see any November posts via nin except one from Boo on
>> 4/11 which was crossposted.
>
> then there is 'definitely' summat up, cos there aren't any posts from
> me in unnc that were crossposted
> :-)
Different posts in reply to the same crosspost - crafty Boo>;-)
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:59:48 -0000
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
MCC said:
>> There are! I have 24 going back to August! And that's in NIN.
>>
>> Go back to your download in unnc, the Second CFV was posted
>> 03/11/2009 at
>> 19.20. There are only 3 posts in there after it. The first was
>> 32/10 and that's only the 10th post back from the newest too.
>
> Eventually found it, thanks, Kat. My filters were deleting posts of
> more than 150 lines and those crossposted to more than 2 groups.
Ahhhhh, I knew there had to be some sort of reason for it.
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:00:31 -0000
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
John the R-T said:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000, MCC wrote:
>
>> According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
>>
>> I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
>
> I can see it on Plusnet, Datemas and eternal-september. Looking at
> the message ID I see that there is no dot between gradwell and net.
> Can't find it with Google though.
I think, I am not certain, but CFVs don't get posted to Google at all
because we don't want people chancing upon it 4 years later and trying to
vote.
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:02:33 -0000
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
Rabbit said:
> "John the R-T" wrote in message
> news:1mt6lha0lq4g8.poswmwo1g1qd$.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:33:29 +0000, MCC wrote:
>>
>>> According to news.individual.net there are no posts in that group!
>>>
>>> I'm starting to feel disenfranchised <LOL>
>>
>> I can see it on Plusnet, Datemas and eternal-september. Looking at
>> the message ID I see that there is no dot between gradwell and net.
>> Can't find it with Google though.
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.net.news.announce/browse_thread/thread/f4e457a9a3d13ae6?hl=en
> will take you to the post.
or maybe they stay a week or two and then go. One or the other anyway.:-)
--
kat
>^..^<
date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:03:29 -0000
author: kat
|
Re: 2nd Call For Votes
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:38:19 +0000, John the R-T
wrote:
>On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:24:11 +0000, Peter Grange wrote:
>
>> I thought it was "Your Vote May Vary" :-;
>
> :-)
>
>Could be. But I meant it for any lurkers from elsewhere.
Just reading this again, I realise I cocked up the smiley, but I
suspect not the vote. I only voted for 3.
--
Pete
date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:14:43 +0000
author: Peter Grange
|
|
|